Fresenius Medical Care River City
A dialysis facility in Columbus, Georgia 31904
2443 Brookstone Center Parkway, Suite B, Columbus, Georgia 31904. (706) 327-6350.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 1of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 17 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Sep 4, 2025: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Sep 4, 2025: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 697 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 52051 Based on observation, a review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, staff and patient interviews, and a review of facility Policies and Procedures (P & P), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two of two Registered Nurses (RN AA and RN BB), and one of one Patient Care Technician (PCT BB) observed, consistently performed hand hygiene (handwashing with soap and water or use of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer) upon entering the Patient Treatment Room and after touching contaminated area/equipment. This breach in infection control techniques, such as hand hygiene, had the potential to increase the risk for cross contamination with the potential to expose patients and staff to bloodborne pathogens in the dialysis environment. The facility had 65 in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients. Findings include: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 9/4/25 from 8:10 a.m. to 9:46 a.m., the following was revealed: - At 8:49 a.m., PCT BB entered the Patient Treatment Room. She put on her gown and face shield, then proceeded to the rolling cart situated in front of Station (S)10 and S11. Without sanitizing her hands first, she grabbed a new pair of gloves and put them on, then touched the dialysis machine at S12. At 8:53 a.m., RN BB removed her face shield by grabbing the front side with her bare hands and hung it by the medication refrigerator adjacent to the nurses’ station. She then sat down in front of the computer at the nurses’ station and started charting (clean task) without sanitizing her hands first. At 9:05 a.m., RN AA entered the Patient Treatment Room. She put on her gown and face shield, then proceeded to the nurses’ station while placing her stethoscope around her neck. This surveyor observed that RN AA did not sanitize her hands at any point before using the computer at the nurses’ station. CDC recommends that healthcare workers clean their hands using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer (or soap and water if their hands are visibly soiled) before entering a treatment area. This practice helps prevent the spread of infection and protects both healthcare workers and their patients. Additionally, CDC emphasized that the outside of goggles or face shield are considered contaminated. If hands become contaminated while removing goggles or a face shield, it is important to promptly wash them or use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer. During an interview with patient (P)#2 at S3 on 9/4/25, at 9:27 a.m., she stated that the staff members typically did not wear their Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or sanitize their hands consistently and proactively. She also mentioned that seeing them follow these practices on this day (9/4/25) was unusual for her. During an interview with PCT BB on 9/4/25, at 9:10 a.m., she confirmed that she forgot to sanitize her hands after entering the Patient Treatment Room and she acknowledged the importance of consistent hand hygiene practices. In another interview with RN BB on 9/4/25, at 9:19 a.m., she also acknowledged the observation and stated that she forgot to sanitize her hands after removing face shield before proceeding with other tasks. - A review of facility P & P Reference #47664, titled, “Hand Hygiene”, published 11/6/23, stated: Responsibility All staff, patients, patient care givers, including physicians and non-physician practitioners . . . must follow the same requirement for hand hygiene. Hands will be: Decontaminated using alcohol-based hand rub or by washing hands with anti-microbial soap and water . . . When: - Entering and leaving the treatment area. During a telephonic interview with PCT DD on 9/4/25, at 12:38 p.m., she stated that there were significant infection control issues, specifically regarding proper hand hygiene practices among Direct Patient Care (DPC) staff at the facility. During an interview with the Medical Director on 9/4/25, at 1:43 p.m., he stated that he would ensure all staff members receive re-education or retraining on infection control, particularly regarding proper hand hygiene practices.”
-
Ic - Sinks Available
The inspectors’ words, 656 words
“IC-SINKS AVAILABLE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) A sufficient number of sinks with warm water and soap should be available to facilitate hand washing. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 52051 Based on observation, staff and patient interviews, and a review of facility Policy and Procedures (P & P), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that three of three clean sinks (handwashing sinks), in one of one Patient Treatment Room, had running warm water to encourage patients and staff to wash their hands. This deficient practice had the potential to discourage fourteen of fourteen patients at Station (S)1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14, S15, and S16, and five of five Direct Patient Care (DPC) Staff (Registered Nurses - RN AA and RN BB, and Patient Care Technicians - PCT AA, PCT BB, and PCT CC), who were present during this observation, to wash their hands to prevent cross contamination. The facility had 65 in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients under their care. Findings include: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 9/4/25 from 8:10 a.m. to 9:46 a.m., the following was revealed: - There were a total of three handwashing sinks which were designated as “clean sinks”. - Sink #1 is located on the right side, approximately 10 to 14 feet from the entrance of the Patient Treatment Room, which was accessed from the main lobby. - Sink #2 was located at the nurses’ station, directly across from another exit door that led to the facility’s back hallway. - Sink #3 was located in the medication preparation area. - None of the three sinks mentioned above had running hot water after the surveyor tested them for three minutes. During an interview with PCT AA on 9/4/25, at 8:16 a.m., he stated that it took some time for the running water to warm up. He verbalized, “Water starts to warm up in about five minutes.” PCT AA also stated that the Biomedical Technician (BMT) had been notified about this issue, but PCT AA didn’t remember when the BMT was notified and this issue had not been resolved. During an interview with the Charge Nurse, RN AA, on 9/4/25, at 8:18 a.m., she confirmed that the water in all the clean sinks mentioned above took a while to warm up. RN AA also mentioned that staff members let the water run for some time in the morning before use. During an interview with patient (P)#1 at S16 on 9/4/25, at 8:20 a.m., he mentioned that he had noticed a lack of running hot water whenever he tried to use the sink to wash his hands. He stated that he had been experiencing this issue for about a month. On 9/4/25, at 9:45 a.m., the Director of Operations was informed of this observation and she stated that she would coordinate with the Area Technical Operations Manager. In a follow-up interview on 9/4/25, at 10:50 a.m., the Director of Operations stated that after discussing the issue with the Area Technical Operations Manager, she was informed that there appeared to be a problem with the Water Recirculation Pump. A review of facility P & P Reference #47664, titled, “Hand Hygiene”, published 11/6/23, stated: Sink Policy A sufficient number of sinks with soap and plumbed with both hot and cold water shall be available to facilitate hand washing. During a discussion with the Area Technical Operations Manager on 9/4/25, at 11:07 a.m., he acknowledged this observation and explained that the facility’s Water Recirculation Pump, which had been installed only eight to nine months ago, seemed not to be warming up when he checked it on this date (9/4/25). He stated, “Something’s wrong with it”. During a telephonic interview with PCT DD on 9/4/25, at 12:38 p.m., she stated that there had been no running hot water in the facility, specifically in the Patient Treatment Room, from May 2025 to June 2025, while at the facility.”
-
Ic - Handling Infectious Waste
The inspectors’ words, 574 words
“IC-HANDLING INFECTIOUS WASTE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(i) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing-] (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the- (i) Handling, storage and disposal of potentially infectious waste; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 52051 Based on observation, staff interviews, a review of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Standard, and a review of facility Policies and Procedures (P & P), it was determined that the Infection Control Committee failed to ensure that five of five Direct Patient Care (DPC) Staff (Registered Nurses- RN AA and RN BB, and Patient Care Technicians - PCT AA, PCT BB, and PCT CC), who were present during this observation, properly disposed of waste contaminated with blood found in one of two “non-hazard” waste bins which was left uncovered, in one of one Patient Treatment Room. This failure could potentially expose both patients and staff to infectious materials. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of all DPC Staff and 65 in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients who were under the care of this facility. During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 9/4/25 from 8:10 a.m. to 9:46 a.m., the following was revealed: - There was a total of two large black bins lined with red bags, labeled “Biohazard Waste” (contaminated with potentially infectious agents or other materials, such as blood, body fluids, and human cell lines). - There were two large gray bins lined with black bags, labeled “Non-Hazard Waste” (any waste that causes no harm to human or environmental health, such as materials that do not contain blood or body fluids). These gray bins were uncovered. Inside one of the two large gray bins was a paper towel with a drop of fresh blood about the size of a quarter. At the time of this observation, this gray bin was almost three-quarters full and did not have a lid or cover. During an interview with PCT CC on 9/4/25, at 9:07 a.m., she stated that any items containing blood should be disposed of in the black bin lined with a red “Biohazard” plastic bag. In a subsequent interview with PCT BB on 9/4/25, at 9:10 a.m., she clarified that staff were not supposed to throw anything containing blood into the gray bin. She emphasized that all staff members were aware of this policy. OSHA Bloodborne Standard emphasizes the importance of treating blood and materials contaminated with blood as biohazardous waste rather than regular trash in order to protect public health and the environment. It is essential to place biohazardous waste in specially marked red bags or in closable, leak-proof containers that are labeled with a biohazard symbol. Additionally, improper handling and disposal of blood waste can lead to exposure and the transmission of infectious agents. This surveyor notified the Director of Operations on 9/4/25, at 10:31 a.m., and she stated that staff were not supposed to throw anything into the large gray bin containing blood. - A review of facility P & P Reference #47685, titled, “General Cleanliness and Infection Control Guidelines”, published 9/2/25, stated: Other Regulated Waste - Regulated medical waste shall be placed in a container that is accordance with OSHA bloodborne standard ... and is closeable, leak proof and labeled and/or color coded. - Regulated waste shall be placed in containers which are: *Closeable *Labeled or color-coded”
-
Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment
The inspectors’ words, 650 words
“PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 52051 Based on observation, staff interviews, and a review of facility Policies and Procedures (P & P), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the building in which dialysis services were provided was sanitary and maintained to ensure the safety of all patients and staff. Failure to maintain the integrity of all surfaces could hinder effective cleaning and disinfection of the surfaces, thus providing a potential for microbial growth. These environmental concerns were observed in one of one Patient Treatment Room and one of one Dialysate Preparation Room. The facility had 65 in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients. Findings include: 1. In the Patient Treatment Room: During observation on 9/4/25 from 8:10 a.m. to 9:46 a.m., the following was revealed: - A gray container, resembling a cooler, was located under the laboratory sink labeled “dirty sink.” This container measured approximately 2.5 Feet in length and 1.5 Feet in height. The lid of this container was partially obscured by brownish and rust-colored substances, along with dried, flaky white residues. Next to this was a detached piece of white plywood, placed sideways, which appeared to be a shelf that had been removed from somewhere. The plywood measured approximately 2 Feet in length and 1.5 Feet in width, and showing significant water damage. - Two of two gray rolling carts for clean/sterile dialysis supplies (like dialyzers, gloves, gauze, and saline bags), were partially covered with a noticeable layer of dust and a mixture of brownish and gray grainy substances. - There was a puddle of water behind Machine #10, extending behind the dialysis chair located at Station (S)13. The wet area measured approximately 4 feet in length and 2 feet in width. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN BB) on 9/4/25, at 9:22 a.m., she acknowledged that the rolling supply carts were dirty and stated that she had begun cleaning them. During an interview with Patient Care Technician (PCT AA) on 9/4/25, at 9:28 a.m., he stated that he just found out about the puddle of water behind the dialysis machine at S13, since he just came back to the Patient Treatment Room from his break, and added that he will try to figure out why there was a puddle there. During an interview with PCT CC on 9/4/25, at 9:37 a.m., she acknowledged that the gray container under the laboratory sink, was dirty, but was probably empty. 2. In the Dialysate Preparation Room: During a tour with the Director of Operations on 9/4/25 between 10:05 a.m. and 10:13 a.m., the following was revealed: - The wall and floor drain behind the Reverse Osmosis (RO) System (a system that removes chemical and microbiological contaminants from the water supply for dialysis) was heavily soiled with dark brown and blackish dirt buildup. This indicated that it had not been cleaned for a significant period of time. - The Director of Operations acknowledged this observation during the tour on 9/4/25 at 10:36 a.m., and added that she would coordinate with the Area Technical Operations Manager regarding this matter. During an interview with the Area Technical Operations Manager on 9/4/25 at 11:07 a.m., he acknowledged this observation and stated that the dirt buildup on the floor drain behind the RO System was likely due to its location, which made cleaning challenging. A review of facility P & P Reference #47685, titled, “General Cleanliness and Infection Control Guidelines”, published 9/2/25, stated: - All areas must be kept clean and organized, including but not limited to treatment areas, water/supply rooms, offices and restrooms. - Facility staff are accountable for cleaning rooms/areas not assigned to contracted cleaning staff. Such cleaning should be done regularly using a schedule developed by the facility.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 7, 2007.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 17 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, worse than expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, worse than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 13 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Muscogee County, 11 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 7 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.