Hearth Record

Dci Fayetteville

A dialysis facility in Fayetteville, Georgia 30214

155 Brandywine Boulevard, Fayetteville, Georgia 30214. (770) 716-6940.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 2, 2025: a complaint inspection.

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 7, 2024: standard inspection11 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Water And Dialysate Quality

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “CFC-WATER & DIALYSATE QUALITY CFR(s): 494.40 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation, staff interviews, and a review of policies and procedures (P&P), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was a safe environment for all patients as evidenced by failure of four of four staff [Registered Nurse (RN) AA/Charge Nurse (CN), RN BB, Patient Care Technician (PCT) AA and PCT BB] to verify the expiration dates of the Combined Standard Solution pH 7.0/Conductivity 14.0 used for the calibration of Myron L Meter (A device used to measure pH (acidity) and conductivity (measurement of the dialysate’s ability to conduct electricity), to ensure accuracy of testing dialysate (a solution of pure water, electrolytes and salts such as bicarbonate and sodium) for safe patient use, prior to the initiation of dialysis treatments. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 19 patients that dialyze at this facility. Findings were: Cross Reference V250 - Failure of the facility to ensure that the machines’ dialysate pH and conductivity was accurately tested prior to each patient treatment.”

    Rule V0175. Condition-level.

  • Cfc - Governance

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “CFC-GOVERNANCE CFR(s): 494.180 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on a review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Governing Body failed to demonstrate responsibility and accountability for the operations of the facility. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 19 in-center hemodialysis patients who were dialyzing at this facility. Findings were: Cross Reference V250 - Failure of the facility to ensure that there was a safe environment for all patients as evidenced by failure of four of four staff [Registered Nurse (RN) AA/Charge Nurse (CN), RN BB, Patient Care Technician (PCT) AA and PCT BB] to verify the expiration dates of the Combined Standard Solution pH 7.0/Conductivity 14.0 used for the calibration of Myron L Meter (A device used to measure pH (acidity) and conductivity (measurement of the dialysate’s ability to conduct electricity), to ensure accuracy of testing dialysate (a solution of pure water, electrolytes and salts such as bicarbonate and sodium) for safe patient use, prior to the initiation of dialysis treatments.”

    Rule V0750. Condition-level.

  • Dialysis Emergency Equipment

    The inspectors’ words, 276 words

    “Dialysis Emergency Equipment CFR(s): §494.62(b)(9) Condition for Coverage: [(b) Policies and procedures. The dialysis facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (9) A process by which the staff can confirm that emergency equipment, including, but not limited to, oxygen, airways, suction, defibrillator or automated external defibrillator, artificial resuscitator, and emergency drugs, are on the premises at all times and immediately available. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility’s emergency equipment and drugs were readily available and not expired. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the health and safety of 19 patients who dialyzed at this facility. Findings were: Observation of the emergency crash cart on 6/5/24 at 10:34 a.m., revealed that two of three sets of Philips adult pad cartridges used with the AED (Automatic External Defibrillator) in the event of a cardiac arrest (heart attack) expired on 4/7/24; and one of two Albuterol inhalers used for respiratory distress expired on 4/7/24. During an interview at 10:45 a.m. on 6/5/24, with Registered Nurse (RN) AA, who was the Charge Nurse, she stated “I check the crash cart daily and the other nurse (RN BB) checks it monthly. I was unaware of expired meds or supplies”.”

    Rule E0028. Standard-level.

  • Esrd Patient Orientation Training

    The inspectors’ words, 303 words

    “ESRD Patient Orientation Training CFR(s): The dialysis facility must provide appropriate orientation and training to patients, including the areas specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on a review of facility records, patients and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the patients were oriented and trained on the facility’s Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 19 patients who dialyzed at this facility. Findings were: Review of the Emergency /Safety Binder and Patient Education Binder from November 2023 - June 2024 revealed a lack of documented evidence that patients nor staff had been educated on the facility’s Emergency Plan. Patients had not been trained on emergency disconnection of treatment procedures and there were no documented Fire Drills. During interviews on 6/5/24 with patients between 1:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m., the following was revealed: - At 1:00 p.m., Patient (P) #1, who was seated at Station (S) 1 stated “I started at the facility in March 2023, and I have not been taught anything about Emergency Preparedness”. P#1 denied ever being trained how to disconnect from the machine during an emergency or participated in any Fire Drills. - At 1:10 p.m., P#2, who was seated at S4 stated “I’ve been at this facility for nine years and I think they may have talked to me about Emergency Preparedness and how to disconnect myself from the machine, but I just don’t remember”. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) BB on 6/5/24 at 1:25 p.m., she presented a patient education binder with laminated printouts of various topics located at the nurse’s station used for educating patients and acknowledged that there was no documented evidence of an actual patient training.”

    Rule E0040. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 385 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation, staff interviews, and a review of facility policy and procedures and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and recommendations, it was determined that the Infection Control Committee failed to ensure that one of one Registered Nurse (RN AA) and one of two Patient Care Technicians (PCT BB) observed, changed gloves when going from a “dirty” area or task to a “clean” area or task. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the 19 in-center hemodialysis patients who dialyzed at this facility. Findings were: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 6/5/24 between 10:10 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the following was observed: - At 10:24 a.m., PCT BB was observed preparing the access of Patient (P) #6, who was seated at Station (S) 3 for cannulation (insertion of dialysis needles). PCT BB pushed P#3’s shirt up to expose the arteriovenous graft (AVG - dialysis access) located mid-sternum (middle of the chest), opened clean supplies, cleaned access, and discarded used/contaminated alcohol pad onto the clean pad/liner with clean supplies, then proceeded to cannulate the AVG without changing gloves between tasks. - At 10:52 a.m., RN AA was observed during initiation of hemodialysis treatment on P#7, who had a central venous catheter (CVC - a flexible tube that was inserted into a vein, and was guided/threaded into a large vein above the right side of the heart called the superior vena cava) at S10. RN AA cleaned the CVC site, withdrew blood from the ports, touched the machine (dirty) and keyboard, and then connected P#7’s bloodlines to the CVC. RN AA failed to change gloves between tasks. During an interview with PCT BB and RN AA at approximately 11:00 a.m., both stated they were unaware of the breaches in infection control practices. A review of Procedure: 301, titled, “Universal Precautions” dated 1/16/19 showed the following: Page 4 33. Gloves will be changed as soon as possible following contamination. According to the CDC, cross contaminating (going from dirty to clean equipment/tasks/area) could cause the spread of bacteria/infections.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Sinks Available

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “IC-SINKS AVAILABLE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) A sufficient number of sinks with warm water and soap should be available to facilitate hand washing. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a sufficient number of sinks were readily available in one of one Patient Treatment Room, to facilitate hand washing and to meet the needs of the staff and patients. This facility had 16 in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) stations and 19 ICHD patients who dialyzed at this facility. Findings were: During observation of the Patient Treatment Room on 6/5/24 between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., one of two designated “clean” sinks used for handwashing, was not operable. The clean sink located at the back nurse’s station had discarded plastic syringe caps and other small debris; and the foot pedal used to push to supply water did not work. During and interview with the biomed technician at approximately 11:05 a.m., he acknowledged that the sink did not work.”

    Rule V0114. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 301 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the Infection Control Committee failed to ensure that one of one Nurse Practitioner (NP) observed, wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE such as gown), while she interacted with patients during a time of high risk for spurting or spattering of blood, as, for example, during initiation or termination of dialysis. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of the NP. Findings were: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 6/7/24 from 9:00 a.m. to 10:15 a.m., the following was revealed: - At 9:14 a.m., during shift change, the NP went from patient to patient at Station (S) 5, S6 and S8 and picked up clip boards off the top of each machine, shook hands with a patient while wearing a lab coat which was opened in the front (inappropriate PPE). - At 9:24 a.m., the NP walked over to Patient (P) #8 at S2. NP picked up the clip board off the top of machine while she had a conversation with P#8, during the termination of P#8’s dialysis treatment. The NP left the facility prior to interview. During the exit interview on 6/7/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Area Director and the Senior Director of Operations were notified of the above findings and did not offer any comments.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 559 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation, a review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, staff interviews, review of NKF KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) Vascular Access Guideline, and a review of facility policy and procedures, it was determined that the Infection Control Committee failed to ensure that one of one Registered Nurse (RN AA) observed during initiation and termination of hemodialysis (HD) treatment on two of two patients (P#7 and P#8) observed who had Central Venous Catheter (CVC - a flexible tube that was inserted into a vein, and was guided/threaded into a large vein above the right side of the heart called the superior vena cava), utilized appropriate infection control techniques to prevent cross contamination. This breach in infection control techniques could negatively affect the health and safety of P#7, P#8, and all other patients who had CVC, as their dialysis access. The facility census was 19. Findings were: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 6/5/24 and on 6/7/24 between 9:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the following was observed: - On 6/5/24 at 10:52 a.m., RN AA was observed during initiation of hemodialysis treatment on P#7, who had a CVC at Station (S) 10. RN AA cleaned the CVC site, withdrew blood from the ports, touched the machine (dirty) and keyboard, and then connected P#7’s bloodlines to the CVC. RN AA failed to change gloves between tasks. According to the CDC, cross contaminating (going from dirty to clean equipment/tasks/area), could cause the spread of bacteria/infections. - On 6/7/24 at 9:11 a.m., RN AA was observed terminating dialysis treatment on P#8, who had a CVC at S2. P#8 did not wear a face mask during the entire procedure. During an interview on 6/7/24 at 9:30 a.m., the Nurse Practitioner asked RN AA why the patient was not wearing a mask. RN AA stated “he refused to wear a mask”. A review of the NKF KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) Vascular Access Guideline stated “Airborne contaminants from both patients and staff are prevented best by the use of surgical masks when the catheter lumens or exit site are exposed”. A review of Procedure: 112 titled “Central Venous Protocol” showed the following: Page 3 under Key Points Wearing a face mask decreases the risk of transmitting microorganisms from the respiratory tract of the staff member or the patient, onto the catheter site itself, as well potentially into the vascular system of the patient.”

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Dialysate Proportioning - Monitor Ph/Conductivity

    The inspectors’ words, 359 words

    “DIALYS PROPORT-MONITOR PH/CONDUCTIVITY CFR(s): 494.40(a) 5.6 Dialysate proportioning: monitor pH/conductivity It is necessary for the operator to follow the manufacturer’s instructions regarding dialysate conductivity and to measure approximate pH with an independent method before starting the treatment of the next patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation, a review of policies and procedures (P&P), and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that four of four Direct Patient Care Staff [Registered Nurse (RN) AA/Charge Nurse (CN), RN BB, Patient Care Technician (PCT) AA and PCT BB], verified the expiration date of the Combined Standard Solution pH 7.0/Conductivity 14.0 used for the calibration of Myron L Meter (A device used to measure pH (acidity) and conductivity (measurement of the dialysate’s ability to conduct electricity), to ensure accuracy of testing dialysate (a solution of pure water, electrolytes and salts such as bicarbonate and sodium) for safe patient use, prior to the initiation of dialysis treatments. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 19 in-center hemodialysis patients who dialyzed at this facility. Findings were: During inspection on 6/5/24 at approximately 10:10 a.m., of the Tri-Station [a metal holder that housed the pH and conductivity solutions and a bottle of Reverse Osmosis (RO) Water used for the calibration of Myron L Meters], the following was revealed: - The Mesa Labs Combined Standard Solution pH 7.0/Conductivity 14.0 had expired on 11/17/23 but was dated as opened by the staff on 3/11/24 and had been used to calibrate the Myron L Meters from 3/11/24 through 6/5/24. A review of an undated procedure titled, “Myron L D6 Meter Disinfection, Calibration, Use and Storage” showed the following: Confirm that the 14.0 mS conductivity and 7.0 pH buffer solutions expiration dates (x2) are not expired. During an interview on 6/5/24 at 11:03 a.m., the Biomed Technician confirmed that the staff was currently using the solution and he was unaware that the solution was expired. He immediately discarded the solution and brought a new bottle from the Supply Room. Both RN AA and RN BB stated they were unaware of the expired solution.”

    Rule V0250. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Building - Constructed/Maintained To Ensure Safety

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “PE-BUILDING-CONSTRUCT/MAINTAIN FOR SAFETY CFR(s): 494.60(a) The building in which dialysis services are furnished must be constructed and maintained to ensure the safety of the patients, the staff and the public. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all cabinets were maintained free from damage and defects to ensure safety for all patients and staff. This environmental concern was observed in one of one Patient Treatment Room. This deficient practice had the potential to cause injury to staff and patients who were seated nearby. The facility census was 19. Findings were: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 6/5/24 between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., the cabinet located at the back nurse’s station that stored bags of normal saline (sterile salt water), had one door broken off the hinges and the second door was missing. During an interview with the Biomed Technician on 6/5/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m., he acknowledged the broken cabinet doors.”

    Rule V0402. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32734 Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two of eight patients (P#11 and P#12) observed during dialysis treatment, had their vascular access sites uncovered/visible to the staff throughout dialysis treatment, to ensure patient safety. This deficient practice could provide an opportunity for accidental needle dislodgement or a line disconnection to go undetected and could result in exsanguination (severe loss of blood). The facility had 19 patients. Findings were: During observation in the Patient Treatment Room on 6/5/24 between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., P#11 who was seated at Station (S) 8 and P#12 who was seated at S12, had their vascular access sites covered with a blanket during dialysis treament. During an interview on 6/5/24 at approximately 10:30 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) AA and Patient Care Technician (PCT) BB both acknowldeged that the patients’ access sites were covered.”

    Rule V0407. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 2, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 7, 2024Standard inspection11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 7, 1997.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
  • Chain: Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 23 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Dialysis Clinic, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Fayette County, 5 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.