Hearth Record

Fresenius Kidney Care Southern Broward

A dialysis facility in Hollywood, Florida 33020

2700 Hollywood Blvd, Suite 100, Hollywood, Florida 33020. (954) 926-5090.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 5, 2025: a standard inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 5, 2025: standard inspection6 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40153 Based on observations, interviews, and chart review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during initiation of dialysis via a central venous catheter (CVC) for 1 of 9 patients observed (Patient #15). The findings included: A chart review revealed that Patient #15 was admitted to the facility on 10/28/2024 for in-center hemodialysis. In an observation conducted on 08/04/25 at noon, Staff R, Licensed Practical Nurse, was observed initiating dialysis via CVC for Patient #15. She washed her hands, placed a pile of new gloves and supplies on the chairside bare surface without placing the clean items on a clean surface. She then put on a pair of gloves from the pile and touched the dialysis machine and dialyzer. She removed her dirty gloves and proceeded to touch the access site without washing her hands in between. During this entire observation, she replaced her gloves 3 times using the pile of gloves on the bare surface of the chairside. In an interview conducted on 08/05/25 at 2:00 PM with the Clinical Manager, she was made aware of the findings.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51535 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all equipment was maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, as evidenced by the staff failure to ensure the emergency supplies are readily available for use prior to the manufacturers documented expiration date. The findings included: An observation of the Home Hemodialysis Emergency Cart conducted on 08/04/25 at 2:30 PM revealed 10 cc normal saline (NS) flush x 12 syringes expired 06/25/25, non-woven gauze expired 5/27/25, and Island Dressing ZD Pore x 10 expired 02/2025. An interview conducted on 08/04/25 at 2:30 PM with the Clinical Manager (CM) who confirmed the expired supplies.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx

    The inspectors’ words, 335 words

    “PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40153 Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff monitored dialysis treatments in a timely manner for 3 of 10 patients reviewed (Patient #1, Patient #2, and Patient #8). The findings included: 1) A review of the facility ’ s policy titled “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” dated 05/01/2023 documents the following: “obtain blood pressure and pulse rate every 30 minutes or more as needed, but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations.” A chart review revealed Patient #1 was admitted to the facility on 04/29/2025 for in-center hemodialysis. The dialysis treatment sheet for Patient #1 dated 07/31/2025 revealed that staff monitored and documented data at 2:03 PM and again at 2:51 PM, 48 minutes later. A chart review revealed Patient #8 was admitted to the facility on 08/08/2023 for in-center hemodialysis. The dialysis treatment sheet for Patient #8 dated 07/23/2025 revealed that staff monitored and documented data at 8:00 AM and again at 8:51 AM, 51 minutes later. In an interview conducted on 08/05/25 at 2:00 PM with the Clinical Manager she was made aware of the findings. 51535 2) A clinical record review conducted on 08/04/25 at 4:00 PM, revealed Patient #2, treatment record dated 07/22/2025 and 05/13/25 indicates the patient vital signs were not monitored every 30-45 minutes. On 07/22/2025 during dialysis treatment for Patient #2, the vital signs were documented at 15:31 and 16:30 which is a total of 59 minutes interval during the dialysis procedure. On 05/13/2025 during dialysis treatment for Patient #2, the vital signs were documented at 17:05 and 18:09 which is a total of 1 hour and 5 minutes interval during the dialysis procedure. The treatment records do not provide an explanation for the deviation of clinical monitoring every 30-45 minutes during the dialysis procedure.”

    Rule V0503. Standard-level.

  • Frequency - Initial: 30 Days/13 Tx

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “PA-FREQUENCY-INITIAL-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.80(b)(1) An initial comprehensive assessment must be conducted on all new patients (that is, all admissions to a dialysis facility), within the latter of 30 calendar days or 13 hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40153 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an initial nursing assessment was completed before the first dialysis treatment for 1 of 10 patients reviewed (Patient #1). The findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care dated 07/02/2023 documents the following: “a Registered Nurse must perform an assessment on patients new to dialysis and before initiation of their first treatment to determine immediate need.” A chart review revealed Patient #1 was admitted to the facility on 04/29/2025 for in-center dialysis. Further record review did not show an initial nurse screening was completed before the start of the first dialysis treatment. In an interview conducted on 08/05/25 at 2:00 PM with the Clinical Manager she was made aware of the findings.”

    Rule V0516. Standard-level.

  • Poc Completed/Signed By Idt & Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “POC-COMPLETED/SIGNED BY IDT & PT CFR(s): 494.90(b)(1) The patient’s plan of care must- (i) Be completed by the interdisciplinary team, including the patient if the patient desires; and (ii) Be signed by the team members, including the patient or the patient’s designee; or, if the patient chooses not to sign the plan of care, this choice must be documented on the plan of care, along with the reason the signature was not provided. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51535 Based on clinical record review, administrative record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence of developing a completed annual plan of care. This failure affected 1 of 10 sample patients reviewed (Patient #5). The findings included: A clinical records review on 08/04/25 at 5:30 PM for Patient #5 revealed an incomplete Plan of Care dated 01/03/25 without a patient signature. The review of the facility policy Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care, published 07/03/2023, documented, “The patient’s level of participation is determined by the patient. The patient must sign the plan of care to acknowledge the information in the plan. If the patient chooses not to sign their plan of care, the reason for refusal must be documented in the patient’s medical record.” An interview conducted with Clinical Manager (helper) 08/04/25 at 5:45 PM, who confirmed the hard copy labeled Plan of Care, does not have the patient’s signature.”

    Rule V0556. Standard-level.

  • Patients Seen By Med Staff Member Monthly

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “POC-PTS SEEN BY MED STAFF 1X/MO CFR(s): 494.90(b)(4) The dialysis facility must ensure that all dialysis patients are seen by a physician, nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist or physician’s assistant providing ESRD care at least monthly, as evidenced by a monthly progress note placed in the medical record, and periodically while the hemodialysis patient is receiving in-facility dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40153 Based on interview and chart review, the facility failed to ensure a monthly physician’s notes were completed for 2 of 10 patients reviewed (Patient #9 and Patient #5). The findings included: 1. A review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care” dated 07/02/2023 documents the following: “a minimum, monthly medical progress notes must be in every patient’s medical record that document that a physician or a non-physician has seen each patient. A record review revealed Patient #9 was admitted to the facility on 11/21/2024 for in-center hemodialysis. Further reviews revealed a monthly MD note was not completed for July 2025. In an interview conducted on 08/05/25 at 2:00 PM with the Clinical Manager she was made aware of the findings. 51535 2) Record review revealed Patient #5 started Home Hemodialysis (HHD) on 08/29/2019. A review of clinical records revealed no physician notes for March 2025, April 2025, and July 2025. An interview with the Clinical Manager (helper) on 08/05/25 at 9:00 AM, she acknowledges the months of March 2025, April 2025, and July 2025 are missing the physician monthly notes.”

    Rule V0560. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 5, 2025Standard inspection6 deficiencies cited
Jun 19, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 25, 2018.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 17 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, worse than expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (36 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 69% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 54 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Broward County, 46 have a star rating from CMS: 5 rated 4 of 5, 15 rated 3 of 5, 18 rated 2 of 5, 8 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.