Hearth Record

Fresenius Kidney Care Sebastian

A dialysis facility in Sebastian, Florida 32958

14355 Us Hwy 1, Sebastian, Florida 32958. (772) 388-5588.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 13, 2023: a standard inspection.

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 13, 2023: standard inspection8 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29151 Based on observation, policy review and interview, it was determined, the clinical staff failed to follow standard infection control practices to minimize the risk of cross contamination as evidenced by failure to follow guidelines to perform proper hand hygiene during discontinuation of treatment. This failure affected 1 of 2 observations of care affecting Station #5. Center of Disease Control guidelines state proper hand washing is the most important measure against cross contamination. The findings included: Observation of care conducted on 12/11/23 at 10:15 AM revealed Staff A, a Patient Care Technician, discontinuing treatment at Station #5. The staff performed hand hygiene, and don clean gloves, then proceeded to touch the machine, reinfused the extracorpeal circuit and disconnected the blood lines. With the same gloves the staff proceeded to remove the first needle, covered the site with a clean bandage and proceeded to remove the second needle. Interview with Staff A conducted on 12/13/23 at 8:23 AM revealed the staff acknowledges she should have use clean hands and gloves prior to removing the needle and after touching the dialysis machine. Facility policy titled “Post Treatment Fistula Needle Removal” dated 07/06/21 documents “To provide instructions for fistula and graft needle removal at the end of the dialysis treatment to minimize access trauma and achieve optimal hemostasis. Follow the following steps: Person removing needles perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves.””

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 310 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29151 Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices related to cleaning and disinfection of the dialysis station. This is evidenced by an observation of the staff disinfecting the dialysis machine, while the patient was still at the station (Station #8). The findings included: An observation of termination of treatment conducted on 12/11/23 at approximately 9:50 AM at Station #8 revealed Staff B, a Patient Care Technician (PCT), disinfecting the dialysis machine while the patient was observed sitting at the station and still holding his access site. After the patient left the station, Staff B proceeded to disinfect the dialysis chair. At approximately 10:05 AM, another patient was set up at Station #8 and the staff did not disinfect the dialysis machine after the previous patient vacated the station. Staff B failed to ensure at the end of the dialysis treatment, all surfaces were appropriately cleaned. Interview with Staff B conducted on 12/13/23 at 8:40 AM revealed the staff confirmed the observation and stated her understanding was that she could disinfect the machine while the patient was at the station, but she could not set up the machine until the patient had vacated the chair. Facility policy titled “Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station” dated 09/05/23 documents “For patients dialyzing in a treatment area where multiple patients dialyze, the patient must completely vacate the dialysis station before the dialysis machine can be externally disinfected, allowed to dry and set up for the next treatment.””

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22517 Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to adhere to their policy and procedure regarding current aseptic techniques for labeling of multi-dose vials of medications, as evidenced by, the Home Training Nurse failed to appropriately label medication vials when opened. The findings included: An observation in the Home Training Room 1 revealed a opened multi-dose vial of Heparin Sodium Injection 30,000 USP Units/30 ml stored in a unlocked drawer in the room. The vial did not have an open date on it. An interview was conducted on 12/11/23 at 11:02 AM with the Home Training Nurse who confirmed that the bottle was not labeled properly. Review of the facility’s policy and procedure for Medication Preparation and Administration documented, “When preparing medications if the vial is not used immediately in its entirety, the nurse must place the date and time the vial was opened on the medication label along with their initials. Note: to ensure all open vials are properly marked, the nurse must never walk away from an opened multi-dose vial without writing the date and time the vial was opened. Label any open multi-dose vial that is not used immediately and store vial accordingly.””

    Rule V0143. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care

    The inspectors’ words, 323 words

    “IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29151 Based on observation, policy review and interview, it was determined, the clinical staff failed to implement aseptic technique when providing catheter site care during 1 of 2 observations. The failure affected Station #6. The findings included: Observation of the initiation of treatment with a CVC (Central Venous Cathter) at Station #6 conducted on 12/11/23 starting at 10 AM with the Staff A, a Patient Care Technician, revealed the staff performed hand hygiene, don clean gloves, then removed the old CVC dressing and continued to cleanse the site without removing the dirty gloves and performing hand hygiene. The staff performed the site disinfection with the same gloves used to remove the dirty dressing. An interview conducted on 12/13/23 at 8:23 AM with Staff A, confirmed the above observation. Facility policy titled “Central Venous Catheter Dressing Change” dated 11/02/19 documents “Follow the steps below to remove a catheter dressing and inspect the exit site before initiating treatment. Perform hand hygiene, Don gloves, Remove the old dressing.... Discard the dressing and perform hand hygiene, Clean the catheter exit site.””

    Rule V0147. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 325 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22517 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure all supplies were maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, as evidenced by the failure of the staff to ensure supplies were not available for use beyond the manufacturer’s documented expiration date. The findings included: 1) Observations of the Home training rooms on 12/11/23 beginning at 9:30 AM revealed multiple Lab collection tubes, vacuette, which had expired as follows: a. In Room 2 , there were 9 green top vacuette stored in the plastic storage bin which had expired on 09/30/23. There were also 4 lavender top vacuettes which had expired on 08/31/23. b. In Room 1, there were multiple lab tubes stored in the plastic storage bin which had expired as follows: 9 lavender tops which had expired 08/31/23. It should also be noted that these tubes also had little white specks throughout the inside of the tube. one drawer contained 7 clear top tubes which had expired 10/31/23. 14 Goldenrod yellow tubes which had expired 08/31/23. These tubes also had noted white specks throughout the inner surface of the tubes. 20 Green Top which had expired on 09/30/23. An interview was conducted on 12/11/23 at 11:02 AM with the Home Training Nurse, who stated she was not aware that the lab tubes had expired. She stated that she just received those items from the lab on Friday and she restocked her drawers with them. Review of the facility’s policy regarding Expiration of Supplies, documented that the purpose of the policy provides guidance on “checking expiration dates to assure that supplies are taken out of circulation by the expiration date.””

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29151 Based on record review and interview, it was determined, the clinical staff failed to ensure dialysis prescriptions were followed for 2 of 3 sampled in-center patients (Patient #5 and #6). This failure included deviation of the prescribed Blood Flow Rate (BFR) and Dialysate Flow Rate (DFR) and failure to document the reason for the deviation of treatment. The findings included: 1) Clinical record review conducted on 12/12/23 revealed Patient #6 has physician’s orders for dialysis treatment as of 11/03/23 for Blood Flow Rate (BFR) of 350 and Dialysate Flow Rate (DFR) of autoflow 1.5 (DFR 525). Treatment Records dated 11/22/23, 11/20/23, 11/15/23, 11/10/23, 11/08/23 and 11/03/23 indicates the patient did not receive the prescribed BFR and DFR. The record does not provide an explanation for the deviation from the prescription. 2) Clinical record review conducted on 12/12/23 revealed Patient #5 has physician’s orders for dialysis treatment as of 11/01/23 for Blood Flow Rate (BFR) of 450 and Dialysate Flow Rate (DFR) of 800. Treatment records dated 11/03/23, 11/06/23, 11/29/23, 12/01 and 12/04/23 indicates the patient did not receive the prescribed BFR and treatment records dated 12/01/23 and 12/04/23 indicates the patient did not receive the prescribed DFR. The record does not provide an explanation for the deviation from the prescription. Interview with the Clinical Manager on 12/13/23 at 9:12 AM confirmed the staff failed to adhere to the prescription and failed to document the reason for the change in prescription for Patients #5 and #6.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29151 Based on record review and interview, it was determined, the Medical Director and facility staff failed to ensure the initial nursing assessments had all required elements, including a fall risk assessment. This failure affected 1 of 1 newly admitted in-center patient (Patient #6). The findings included: Clinical record review conducted on 12/12/23 revealed Patient #6 was recently admitted to the facility on 11/01/23. The facility Initial Nurse Assessments, Treatment Flowsheets and Progress Notes failed to document the completion of a Fall Risk assessment. Interview with the Clinical Manager conducted on 12/13/23 at 2:20 PM confirmed the facility does not complete a fall risk assessment as part of the initial assessment. The fall risk assessment is completed as part of the comprehensive assessment, within thirty day of admission.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

  • Medical Records - Complete, Accurate, Accessible

    The inspectors’ words, 262 words

    “MR-COMPLETE, ACCURATE, ACCESSIBLE CFR(s): 494.170 The dialysis facility must maintain complete, accurate, and accessible records on all patients, including home patients who elect to receive dialysis supplies and equipment from a supplier that is not a provider of ESRD services and all other home dialysis patients whose care is under the supervision of the facility. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22517 Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the home records failed to document accurately the administration of the medications administered by the patient at home for 1 of 1 Home Hemodialysis Patients, Patient # 1. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Patient # 1 revealed that the patient was admitted to the facility on 04/03/23 and was prescribed to receive Hemodialysis at home via NxStage Pure Flow four times a week. On 10/13/23, the physician prescribed for the patient to self-administer Mircera 50 mcg subcutaneously (SQ) once. The physician again prescribed on 11/10/23 for the patient to self-administer Mircera 75 mcg SQ once. Review of the corresponding home records revealed that the patient failed to document the administration of the prescribed Mircera doses. An interview was conducted on 12/12/23 in the afternoon with the Home training Nurse. She stated that she noted the administration in the facility’s records but failed to ensure that the patient’s home records reflected the self-administration of the medication. Review of the facility’s policy and procedure regarding Administration of Intravenous Medication for the Home Hemodialysis Patient documented, “the patient and/or care partner will: Document all IV medications administered at home.””

    Rule V0726. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 13, 2023Standard inspection8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 10, 2018.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 13 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Indian River County, 6 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.