Davita Tallahassee South Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Tallahassee, Florida 32301
2410 S Adams St, Tallahassee, Florida 32301. (850) 224-8757.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 20 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 20, 2024: a standard inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 20, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 309 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45827 Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff removed gloves and completed hand hygiene between each station for 1 of 2 observations of cleaning dialysis stations. The findings include: On 11/18/24 beginning at approximately 2:15 PM an observation was conducted of Staff D, a Patient Care Technician, cleaning Station #5. During the process, the dialysis machine at Station #6 began to alarm during the patient’s dialysis. Staff D stopped cleaning Station #5, walked to Station #6 and silenced the alarm on the dialysis machine without changing her gloves or performing hand hygiene. Staff D resumed cleaning Station #5 wearing the same gloves. At approximately 2:19 PM, the dialysis machine at Station #6 began to alarm again. Staff D stopped cleaning Station #5, walked to Station #6 and silenced the alarm without changing her gloves or performing hand hygiene. Staff D then resumed cleaning Station #5 wearing the same gloves. A review of the facility’s policy and procedure 1-05-01 states on Page 2, #7 (a) Gloves should be changed when: iv. After touching one patient or their dialysis delivery system and before arriving to care for another patient or touch another patient’s dialysis delivery system. On 11/19/24 at approximately 12:30 PM an interview was conducted with Staff D who stated her gloves should have been removed, hand hygiene performed, and clean gloves put on before touching the dialysis machine at Station #6 since she was cleaning Station #5. Staff D further stated this was not done because she was in a hurry wanted to check the alarm quickly.”
-
Ic - Items Taken To Station Disposed/Dedicated Or Disinfected
The inspectors’ words, 396 words
“IC-IF TO STATION=DISP/DEDICATE OR DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. -- Nondisposable items that cannot be cleaned and disinfected (e.g., adhesive tape, cloth covered blood pressure cuffs) should be dedicated for use only on a single patient. -- Unused medications (including multiple dose vials containing diluents) or supplies (syringes, alcohol swabs, etc.) taken to the patient’s station should be used only for that patient and should not be returned to a common clean area or used on other patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45827 Based on observations, review of facility policy and procedure and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff disinfected their stethoscopes after patient contact for 2 of 4 staff providing patient care. (Staff A and Staff B). The findings include: On 11/18/24 at approximately 11:40 AM, Staff A, a Patient Care Technician was observed to use a stethoscope on the patient at Station #1 then, without cleaning it, hang the stethoscope on a peg near other stethoscopes. On 11/18/24 at approximately 2:36 PM, Staff B, a Registered Nurse, was observed to use a stethoscope on the patient at Station #6 then replace the stethoscope around her neck without cleaning it. Staff B was then observed to walk over to the patient at Station #14 with the stethoscope still around her neck then proceeded to walk to the desk and use the telephone with the stethoscope still around her neck. A review of the facility’s policy and procedure 1-05-01 - Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities states on Page 4, #14 Non-disposable items are to be disinfected after each patient use, prior to removal from treatment area/station and if contaminated between uses. (a) Stethoscopes will be disinfected with alcohol prep pad and/or 1:100 bleach solution ... On 11/19/24 at approximately 9:00 AM an interview was conducted with Staff A who stated the stethoscope did not need to be cleaned before hanging it up but had to be cleaned before using it on a patient. On 11/19/2424 at approximately 9:15 AM an interview was conducted with Staff B who stated the stethoscope should be cleaned after it is used on a patient and before going to another patient’s station.”
-
Ic - Hbv - Test Pts/Staff Post Last Dose
The inspectors’ words, 323 words
“IC-HBV-TEST PTS/STAFF POST LAST DOSE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Hepatitis B Screening: Patients and Staff Test all vaccines [patients and staff] for anti-HBs 1-2 months after last primary vaccine dose. -- If anti-HBs is <10 mIU/mL, consider patient or staff member susceptible, revaccinate with an additional three doses, and retest for anti-HBs. -- If anti-HBs are =10 mIU/mL, consider immune, and retest patients annually. -- Give booster dose of vaccine to patients if anti-HBs declines to <10 mIU/mL and continue to retest patients annually. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45951 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all employees received Hepatitis B immunity testing in a timely manner for 1 of 3 employees reviewed for vaccination status and immunity testing (Staff C). The findings included: During the employee record review, the surveyor reviewed three employee’s files for vaccination status and Hepatitis B immunity testing. The surveyor was unable to locate the Hepatitis B immunity testing for Staff C, Patient Care Technician. The surveyor noted Staff C had been employed at the facility since 08/21/23. In an interview conducted with the Facility Administrator (FA) and the Senior Manager of Clinical Services, both were able to independently review Staff C’s employee file. Both were unable to locate Staff C’s Hepatitis B immunity testing results. The Senior Manager of Clinical Services stated facility policy stated the immunity testing was supposed to be drawn shortly after an employee was hired. She further stated there had been multiple attempts to draw Staff C’s immunity since her hire but that it never happened. She said they had not been concerned to draw Staff C’s immunity because the facility had no Hepatitis B positive patients. She and the FA confirmed Staff C had the ability to “float” and work at other clinics. The surveyor explained the concern was that there could be Hepatitis B positive patients at other clinics that Staff C was floating to.”
-
Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care
The inspectors’ words, 466 words
“IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45827 Based on observations, review of facility policy and procedure and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Central Venous Catheters (CVC) (a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein, usually below the right collarbone, and guided into a large vein above the right side of the heart) were properly cleaned and hands were sanitized between glove changes for 2 of 2 observations performed (Station #10 and Station #6). The findings include: On 11/19/24 beginning at approximately 10:16 AM, Staff C, a Patient Care Technician, was observed to provide CVC exit site care and initiate the patient for dialysis at Station #10. Staff C did not cleanse each CVC limb/cap prior to accessing and did not sanitize hands between glove changes during the procedure. On 11/19/24 beginning at approximately 10:40 AM, Staff C was observed to provide CVC exit site care and initiate the patient for dialysis at Station #6. Staff C did not cleanse each limb/cap prior to accessing and did not sanitize hands between glove changes during the procedure. A review of the facility’s policy and procedure 1-04-02B Central Venous Catheter (CVC) with Clearguard HD Antimicrobial End Caps Procedure states on Page 4, #9 Clean each CVC limb/cap with a new large alcohol prep pad, starting close to the exit site and finishing with the cap. The policy also states on Page 4, #7 and Page 5, #10 and #14 Remove gloves and discard. Perform hand hygiene per procedure and re-glove. On 11/19/24 at approximately 11:45 AM, an interview was conducted with the Senior Manager of Clinical Services who stated the CVC caps should be cleaned prior to accessing. On 11/19/24 at approximately 12:00 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff C who stated she was nervous and forgot to clean the CVC caps. She further stated she should have sanitized her hands between each glove change during both procedures, but she was crunched for time.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2024 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 6, 1999.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 20 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, worse than expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 7 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Leon County, 7 have a star rating from CMS: 3 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.