Fmc - Ybor City
A dialysis facility in Tampa, Florida 33610
2525 E. Hillsborough Ave, Suite 209, Tampa, Florida 33610. (813) 231-6859.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 17 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 11, 2025: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Sep 19, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 603 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34768 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff followed infection control precautions for one of two sampled patients (#2) during observation of accessing the fistula for initiation of dialysis, during cleaning of a dialysis station and wearing of artificial fingernails. Findings included: During observation of dialysis treatment on 09/18/2024 at 10:30 a.m. it was noted that Staff A, Patient Care Technician (PCT) was accessing the AV fistula for Patient #2. Staff A removed her gloves and replaced her gloves without hand sanitizing. It was noted she had artificial fingernails longer than her fingers. Staff A pushed up the patient’s sleeve with gloves in place. Staff located and palpated for the thrill and listened for the bruit through a stethoscope. Staff A cleaned the stethoscope. She removed her gloves and replaced one glove on her right hand. Staff A opened a supply drawer and removed supplies. She replaced her second glove. Staff A cleansed the AV site with disinfectant. A tourniquet was applied. Staff A accessed both upper and lower sites and applied tape. Staff A removed her gloves, hand sanitized, and moved the patient’s wheelchair. Staff A supplied gloves, inputted into the dialysis machine, touched her face, touched the computer and removed her gloves. She touched her face, hand sanitized, and replaced her gloves. She inputted into the dialysis machine and attached the tubings to the cannulation needles. On 09/18/2024 at 9:23 a.m. Staff A, PCT was cleaning station 22 with only a right glove on. Staff A touched the used oxygen machine and used blood pressure cuff with her bare left hand. She cleaned the dialysis machine and chair with her gloved right hand. She held the used blood pressure cuff in her non -gloved hand and wiped it with the bleach cleaner with the gloved hand. She removed her right glove and hand sanitized. During an interview with the Facility Administrator / Director of Nursing on 09/19/2024 at 12:20 pm. stated the staff needed to remove their gloves, perform hand hygiene and re-glove. The staff was not to have artificial fingernails. The hand sanitizing was to be done after touching inanimate objects. He stated everything was dirty. Record review of the facility’s Policy, “Hand Hygiene,” published 11/06/2023 showed 07/05/2022 showed the purpose of the policy is to prevent transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and staff through cross contamination. Hand hygiene includes either washing hands with soap and water or using a waterless alcohol based antiseptic hand rub with 60 to 90% alcohol content. Hands will be decontaminated using alcohol based hand rub or by washing hands with antimicrobial soap and water before and after direct contact with patients, before performing any invasive procedure such as vascular access cannulation or administration of parental medications, immediately after removing gloves after contact with body fluids or excretion, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, and wound dressings if hands are not visibly soiled after contact with inanimate objects near the patient when moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site of the same patient after contact with other objects within the patient station or treatment space Record review of the facility’s policy, “Employee Dress Code,” effective 06/18/2021 showed fingernails must be clean and no more than ¼ of an inch beyond tip of the finger. 5. Fingernail polish or imitation fingernails are not allowed.””
Feb 27, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Achieve Adequate Clearance
The inspectors’ words, 498 words
“POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44048 Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to implement the physician ordered dialysis prescription for two (Patient #1 and Patient #2) out of two sampled patients. This failure resulted in the potential for inadequate dialysis treatments for Patient #1 and Patient #2. Findings: 1. On 2/27/2022 Patient #1’s medical record was reviewed. Patient #1 was admitted to the end-stage renal dialysis clinic (ESRD) for in-center hemodialysis on 9/4/2020. a. The dialysis prescription order dated 1/17/2024 indicated: -Hemodialysis 3x qw (three times a week). -Dialyzer: Optiflux 200NRe -Blood flow rate (BFR): 550 -Dialysate flow rate (DFR): Manual 700 -Potassium: 2.0 -Sodium: 137 -Estimated Dry Weight EDW: 123 -Duration: 4:15 -Calcium: 2.5 -Bicarbonate: 35 b. The post treatment records for 2/14/2024 and 2/21/2024 indicated the dialysis flow rate (DFR) was at 800 (not 700 as prescribed) for the administered dialysis treatment on both days. There was no documented reason in Patient #1’s record why the prescribed DFR was not achieved 2/14/2024 and 2/21/2024. 2. On 2/27/2022 Patient #2’s record was reviewed. Patient #2 was admitted to the end-stage renal dialysis clinic (ESRD) for in-center hemodialysis on 10/06/2016. a. The dialysis prescription order dated 11/13/2023 indicated: -Hemodialysis 3x qw (three times a week). -Dialyzer: 180NRe Optiflux -Blood flow rate (BFR): 450 -Dialysate flow rate (DFR): Manual 500 -Potassium: 2.0 -Sodium: 137 -Estimated Dry Weight EDW: 84.5 -Duration: 3:00 -Calcium: 2.0 -Bicarbonate: 31 b. The post treatment records for 2/21/2024 and 2/23/2024 indicated the average blood flow rate (BFR) was 380 and 390 (not 450 as prescribed) for the administered dialysis treatments. There was no documented reason in Patient #2’s record why the prescribed BFR was not achieved 2/21/2024 and 2/23/2024. 3. On 2/27/2024 @ 2 pm the treatment records for Patient #1 and Patient #2 were reviewed with the Facility Administrator and Charge Nurse. Both confirmed the identified variances from dialysis prescription of Patient #1 and Patient #2. The Facility Administrator and Charge Nurse both acknowledged there was no documentation in both patient’s treatment records of reason for variations identified from dialysis prescription. Both stated the orders should be followed and documented if not, “any variation from the order should be documented.” 4. Review of the facility Clinical Services policy and procedure, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring” dated 5/1/2023 indicated, “...During treatment Document machine parameters and safety checks every 30 or more often as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes per state regulations...Check prescribed blood flow is being achieved or reason is documented in medical record if unable to meet prescribed blood flow. Check dialysate flow rate setting is correct, and the prescribed flow is being delivered...Document any findings and interventions in the medical record.””
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 11, 2025 | Standard inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Feb 27, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Feb 7, 1997.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 17 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, worse than expected.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (33 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 58% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 30 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Hillsborough County, 26 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 8 rated 3 of 5, 13 rated 2 of 5, 4 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.