Davita Quincy Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Quincy, Florida 32351
878 Strong Rd, Quincy, Florida 32351. (850) 854-8001.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 22 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Oct 23, 2024: a standard inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Oct 23, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 449 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51235 Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff removed gloves between each station, and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed after removing gloves for 3 of 12 observations. The findings include: On 10/21/2024 at approximately 10:40 AM. PCT (Patient Care Technician) C was observed wearing gloves prepping station #10, remove her gloves, donned new gloves and proceed to station #11 touching machine to silence an alarm. She returned to station #10, removed gloves and donned gloves without washing or performing hand hygiene. PCT C then began touching bloodlines and machine. On 10/21/2024 at approximately 10:50 AM RN (Registered Nurse) B observed cannulating (inserting fistula needles) fistula for initiation of dialysis for patient #13. RN B performed hand hygiene, donned a pair of gloves, evaluated access by palpating the site to locate the cannulation site and then proceeded to apply antiseptic, and insert the dialysis cannulation needles without changing gloves after touching the cannulation site. On 10/21/2024 at approximately 3:45 PM. PCT D was observed wearing gloves prepping station #18 proceed to station #16, touch machine with same gloves to silence the alarm. He then returned to station #18 touching machine with same gloves. At no point did PCT D remove his gloves and wash or sanitize his hands. An interview with PCT C on 10/21/2024 at approximately 2:00 PM confirmed that she should have performed hand hygiene before donning new gloves and before moving to another station. An interview with PCT D on 10/23/2024 at approximately 8:30 AM confirmed he should have removed gloves, performed hand hygiene and donned new gloves before moving to another station. An interview with RN B on 10/23/24 at approximately 9:30 AM confirms she did not disinfect access site after palpating the access after applying antiseptic. A review of the facility’s policy and procedure -1-05-01 entitled “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” Under heading HAND HYGIENE “1. All teammates, Physicians and Non-Physicians will perform hand hygiene - b. prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves; d. after patient and dialysis delivery system contact; g. before touching clean areas such as supplies, supply cart and chairside keyboard/mouse.” A review of the faciity’s policy and procedure entitled “AV (arteriovenous) Fistula or Graft Cannulation with JMS SYSLOC Mini Safety Fistula Needles (SFN) and Administration of Heparin Loading Dose,” #1-04-01D indicates “16. Remove gloves, perform hand hygiene an dput on clea gloves prior to cannulation.””
-
Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds
The inspectors’ words, 299 words
“IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51235 Based on observation, interview and review of the facility’s policy, the facility failed to ensure safe injection practices based on CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines were followed for 1 of 2 medication administrations observed. (Registered Nurse - RN A) The findings include: On 10/21/2024 at approximately 10:55 AM RN A was observed for medication preparation and administration. RN A was to administer Heparin 2000 units. RN A was observed to clean the vial stopper with an alcohol prep and withdrew approximately one milliliter of heparin with syringe, recapped needle, and set syringe aside. RN A then opened a new Heparin vial, cleaned vial stopper with alcohol prep, and used same syringe she used on first vial and withdrew heparin from second vial. An interview with RN A on 10/21/2024 at approximately 2:00 PM confirmed that she should have used a new sterile syringe and needle to enter the second vial. Review of the faciity’s policy and procedure entitled “Medication Policy” 1-06-01, indicates that multi-dose vials used for IV (intravenous) administration must be entered each time with a new sterile syringe and needle due to Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidance that states residual amounts of medication from a multi-dose vial (either in vial or syringe) must never be pooled with medication from another syringe. A review of the CDC’s website, https://www.cdc.gov/injection-safety/hcp/clinical-safety/index.html , indicates “ Healthcare providers should always use a new needle and syringe when accessing the contents of a multi-dose vial. Reuse of needles or syringes can contaminate medicine with germs, which can spread to others.””
-
Manage Volume Status
The inspectors’ words, 430 words
“POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45951 Based on patient record reviews, staff interviews and review of the facility’s policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that patients reached their prescribed target weight for 1 of 8 patients reviewed (Patient #9). The findings included: A total of nine treatment records were reviewed from 10/02/2024 to 10/21/2024 for Patient #9. It was noted on these nine treatment records that Patient #9 was prescribed to reach a target weight of 87.5kg (kilograms) or 88kg. On 10/09/2024, Patient #9’s prescribed target weight was 87.5kg; however, the recorded post treatment weight was 89.1kg. On 10/16/2024, Patient #9’s prescribed target weight was 88kg; however, the recorded post treatment weight was 89.2kg. On 10/18/2024, Patient #9’s prescribed target weight was 88kg; however, the recorded post treatment weight was 89.8kg. There was no inidcation the patient’s post treatment weights were addressed. A review of Patient #9’s progress notes provided for review revealed one Nursing Note, 10/14/2024, which indicated the Clinical Coordinator had spoken with the physician and received an order to change Patient #9’s prescribed target weight to 88kg. The surveyor was unable to find further documentation from the nursing staff regarding physician notification of Patient #9 not meeting their prescribed target weight. An interview was conducted with the facility’s Clinical Coordinator on 10/23/2024 at 12:46 PM. She independently reviewed Patient #9’s chart and found no additional documentation in the progress notes or the computerized chairside documentation to explain the miss of target weights for Patient #9 or if the physician was notified of this concern aside from her note written on 10/14/2024. A review of the facility’s policy and procedure entitled “Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring, and Nursing Assessment,” Policy: 1-03-08, dated April 2024, revealed the following: 12. The licensed nurse notifies the physician as needed if changes in patient status. 13. All findings, interventions, and patient response will be documented in the patient’s medical record.” On page 5, “Abnormal Findings” - “the teammate who is observing or collecting information should report to the licensed nurse whenever there is a concern for the patient’s condition. Members of the patient care team should report any changes in patient conditions or concerns of patient well-being immediately to the licensed nurse at any time.” Post-treatment if patient is above or below 1 kilogram (kg) from the target weight.”
-
Achieve Adequate Clearance
The inspectors’ words, 451 words
“POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45951 Based on patient record reviews, staff interviews and review of the facility’s policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the physician’s prescribed blood flow rate (BFR) and dialysate flow rate (DFR) were followed for 2 of 8 patients reviewed (Patient #1 and #3). The findings included: A total of seven treatment records were reviewed from 09/30/2024 to 10/21/2024 for Patient #1. It was noted on these seven treatment records that Patient #1 was prescribed to reach a blood flow rate (BFR) of 400 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and a dialysate flow rate (DFR) of 800mL/min. On 09/3020/24, the staff documented the DFR was set to 600 to 610mL/min for the whole treatment time. On 10/04/24, the staff documented the DFR was set to 600 to 610mL/min for the whole treatment time. On 10/14/24, the staff documented the BFR was set to 200 to 350mL/min for the whole treatment time. There was no indication why the prescribed rates were not followed. A total of nine treatment records were reviewed from 10/02/2024 to 10/21/2024 for Patient #3. It was noted on these nine treatment records that Patient #3 was prescribed to reach a blood flow rate (BFR) of 400 milliliters per minute (mL/min). On 10/09/2024, the staff documented the BFR was set to 250 to 300mL/min for most of the treatment time. On 10/14/2024, the staff documented the BFR was set to 200 to 350mL/min for most of the treatment time. There was no indication why the prescribed rate was not followed. An interview was conducted with the facility’s Clinical Coordinator on 10/23/2024 at 12:13 PM. She independently reviewed Patient #1 and Patient #3’s charts and found no documentation in the progress notes or the computerized chairside documentation to explain the consistent miss of prescribed BFR and DFR for Patients #1 and #3 or if the staff had notified the physician of these concerns. A review of the facility policy and procedure entitled “Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring, and Nursing Assessment,” 1-03-08, last revised April 2024 revealed the following: “10. If the dialysis prescription is not being met (including dialysis flow rate or change/inability to obtain prescribed flow rate) the reason will be documented, and the licensed nurse informed.” “12. The licensed nurse notifies the physician as needed if changes in patient status. 13. All findings, interventions, and patient response will be documented in the patient’s medical record.””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2024 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 27, 1990.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 22 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (45 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 61% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Gadsden County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.