Davita Northeastern Colorado Diaysis
A dialysis facility in Sterling, Colorado 80751
1329 E Main Street, Sterling, Colorado 80751. (970) 740-5368.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 30, 2024: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 30, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Infection Control
The inspectors’ words, 213 words
“CFC-INFECTION CONTROL CFR(s): 494.30 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 45020 Based on the manner and degree of the standard level deficiencies referenced to the Condition, it was determined the Condition of Participation §494.30 Infection Control, was out of compliance. V113 - Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure three of four patients observed holding pressure to their access sites (locations where needles were inserted and then removed for treatment) performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves and prior to leaving the facility V122 - [Standard: Procedures for infection control. The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing-] [Maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-](ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure patient care staff cleaned and disinfected the patient treatment station chair per facility policy in one of three observations of dialysis station cleaning. Specifically, staff did not allow the chair to fully dry.”
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 561 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45020 Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure three of four patients observed holding pressure to their access sites (locations where needles were inserted and then removed for treatment) performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves and prior to leaving the facility. Findings include: Facility policy: The Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities policy read, the purpose of this policy is to minimize the spread of infections or bloodborne pathogens in the dialysis facility environment. Patients and caregivers will be encouraged to perform hand hygiene after treatment before leaving the treatment area. 1. The facility failed to ensure patients performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves. A. Observations i. On 5/28/24 at 3:51 p.m., an observation was conducted at station #10. The patient was observed holding pressure to their own site with a gloved hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. After stabilization of the site, patient care technician (PCT) #1 applied a dressing to the site. The patient then removed the soiled glove and, without performing hand hygiene, packed their belongings, weighed themselves at the scale and left the facility. PCT #1 did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following glove removal. ii. On 5/28/24 at 4:15 p.m., an observation was conducted at station #12. The patient’s caregiver was observed holding pressure with a gloved hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. After stabilization of the site, PCT #1 applied a dressing to the site. The patient’s caregiver then removed the soiled glove and, without performing hand hygiene, packed the patient’s belongings,and left the facility. PCT #1 did not educate or request the patient’s caregiver to perform hand hygiene following glove removal. iii. On 5/29/24 at 9:30 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #8. The patient was observed holding pressure to their own site with a gloved hand following removal of the needles used for treatment. After stabilization of the site, PCT #2 applied a dressing to the site. The patient then removed the soiled glove and, without performing hand hygiene, packed their belongings and left the facility. PCT #2 did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following glove removal. B. Interviews i. On 5/30/24 at 8:38 a.m., an interview was conducted with PCT #4. PCT #4 stated after the patient’s access site was stabilized, the patient was to remove their glove and perform hand hygiene. PCT #4 stated if a patient did not perform hand hygiene after glove removal there was a risk of infection. ii. On 5/30/24 at 8:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with registered nurse (RN) #3. RN #3 stated after the patient’s access site was stabilized, the patient was to remove their glove and perform hand hygiene. RN #3 stated hand hygiene was important for patients because there was a risk of transferring viruses to others, including blood stream infections which could cause death. This was in contrast to facility policy which read, patients and caregivers would be encouraged to perform hand hygiene after treatment before leaving the treatment area.”
-
Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols
The inspectors’ words, 544 words
“IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45020 Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure patient care staff cleaned and disinfected the patient treatment station chair per facility policy in one of three observations of dialysis station cleaning. Specifically, staff did not allow the chair to fully dry. Findings include: Facility policy: The Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities policy read, the purpose of this policy is to minimize the spread of infections or blood borne pathogens in the dialysis facility environment. At the end of each treatment, the dialysis station will be cleaned and disinfected. Surfaces to disinfect include but are not necessarily limited to all surfaces in contact with the patient or their belongings (e.g., dialysis chair). Use an appropriate disinfectant such as 1:100 (one to one hundred) bleach solution for routine disinfection of environmental surfaces. Disinfection should be completed by using a wiping motion with friction. Sufficient disinfectant should be applied so that surfaces are visibly wet. Surfaces should be allowed to air dry in order to provide sufficient disinfectant contact time. Reference: According to the manufacturer’s instructions for use for Pure Bright germicidal ultra bleach, for sanitizing non-porous surfaces, prepare a solution of this product, wash surface, let stand 5 minutes to air dry. 1. The facility failed to ensure dialysis chairs were cleaned and disinfected between patient treatments according to facility policy. Direct patient care staff did not leave the dialysis chair fully open to ensure all surfaces were disinfected. A. Observations i. On 5/28/24 at 10:20 a.m., PCT #2 was observed as they disinfected the dialysis chair in station #7. PCT #2 wiped all visible surfaces of the chair with a bleach solution, placed the chair into a fully reclined position to wipe the crevices, but closed the right side arm while the chair remained visibly wet. B. Interviews i. On 5/30/24 at 8:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with registered nurse (RN) #3. RN #3 stated dialysis chairs were to be fully reclined, side arms opened, and all surfaces cleaned with a bleach solution. RN #3 further stated the chair’s arms were to be left open until dry. RN #3 stated it was important for patient chairs to be cleaned with bleach between patient use between patients because it prevented and minimized the risk of infection. ii. On 5/30/24 at 9:14 a.m., an interview was conducted with patient care technician (PCT) #2. PCT #2 stated dialysis chairs were to be fully reclined with side arms opened and all surfaces were to be cleaned with a bleach solution. PCT #2 stated bleach was used to kill any bacteria and if the chair were to be closed while wet, bacteria could grow. PCT #2 stated it was important to clean dialysis chairs between patients because there was a risk of infection, which could cause hospitalization or death. These interviews were in contrast to the observations which revealed a dialysis chair was not fully dry when closed.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
| May 30, 2024 | Standard inspection | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 3, 1995.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Logan County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.