Hearth Record

062548 Stapleton Dialysis (Fmc)

A dialysis facility in Denver, Colorado 80238

7606 E 36th Ave, Denver, Colorado 80238. (303) 322-1513.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 4, 2025: a standard inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 4, 2025: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Cfc - Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “CFC-INFECTION CONTROL CFR(s): 494.30 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 45020 Based on the manner and degree of the standard level deficiencies referenced to the Condition, it was determined the Condition of Participation §494.30 Infection Control, was out of compliance. V113 - Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility’s policy, the facility failed to ensure seven of seven patients, who were observed holding pressure to their access sites (locations where needles were inserted and then removed for treatment), performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves and prior to leaving the facility. V122 - [Standard: Procedures for infection control. The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing-] [Maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-](ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure patient care staff cleaned and disinfected the patient treatment station chair per facility policy in three of four observations of dialysis station cleaning. Specifically, staff did not fully recline the dialysis chair to ensure all surfaces were cleaned.”

    Rule V0110. Condition-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 1,143 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45020 Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility’s policy, the facility failed to ensure seven of seven patients, who were observed holding pressure to their access sites (locations where needles were inserted and then removed for treatment), performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves and prior to leaving the facility. Findings include: Facility policy: The Hand Hygiene policy read, the purpose of this policy is to prevent transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and staff through cross contamination. All staff, patients, patient care givers, including physicians and non-physician practitioners, social workers, dietitians, and any other indirect patient care staff must follow the same requirements for hand hygiene. Hand Hygiene: Patients: Patients should perform hand hygiene if able, prior to and after each dialysis treatment. As needed, direct patient care staff will demonstrate how to operate the sinks, demonstrate hand washing to patients who are able to perform hand washing, and explain risk of contamination with regard to their vascular access and hands to all patients. Gloves must be provided to patients when performing procedures which risk exposure to blood or body fluids, such as when self-cannulating or holding access sites post treatment to achieve hemostasis. To help ensure the prevention of cross contamination to their family members or other patients, hand hygiene must be performed. 1. The facility failed to ensure patients performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves. A. Observations i. On 2/27/25 at 9:00 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #17. The patient was observed holding pressure to their access sites with a gloved right hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. After stabilization of the site, patient care technician (PCT) #1 changed the dressing, the patient removed the glove from their right hand, gathered their belongings and ambulated to the scale. The patient touched the button on the scale to obtain their weight and left the treatment floor. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following the glove removal. ii. On 2/27/25 at 9:11 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #6. The patient was observed holding pressure to their access site with a gloved right hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. At 9:26 a.m., PCT #2 changed the dressing to the access site. The patient gathered their belongings and ambulated to the scale with the glove on their right hand, removed the glove at the scale, obtained their weight and exited the treatment floor. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following the glove removal. iii. On 2/27/25 at 9:20 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #1. The patient was observed holding pressure to their access site with a gloved right hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. At 9:21 a.m., the patient gathered their belongings, ambulated to the scale, touched the scale with their gloved right hand to obtain their weight, then removed the glove and left the treatment floor. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following their glove removal. iv. On 2/27/25 at 9:58 a.m., an observation was conducted of a patient leaving station #5. The patient was observed ambulating to the scale with a glove on their right hand. The patient touched the scale to obtain their weight with their gloved right hand, then exited the treatment floor with the glove on. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene, or request glove removal before leaving the treatment area. v. On 2/27/25 at 10:50 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #15. The patient was observed holding pressure to their access site with a gloved right hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. At 11:17 a.m., registered nurse (RN) #3 changed the dressing to the access site. The patient gathered their belongings, ambulated to the scale, touched the scale with their gloved right hand to obtain their weight, and then exited the treatment floor with the glove remaining on their right hand. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene, or request glove removal before leaving the treatment area. vi. On 3/3/25 at 10:00 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #20. The patient was observed holding pressure to their access site with a gloved right hand. At 10:11 a.m., the patient’s access sites were visibly bleeding through the dressing. PCT #2 changed the dressing and the patient held pressure to their access sites again. At 10:18 a.m., PCT #2 reinforced the dressing. The patient removed the glove, gathered their belongings, ambulated to the scale, obtained their weight and left the treatment floor. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following their glove removal. vii. On 3/3/25 at 10:13 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #15. The patient was observed holding pressure to their access site with a gloved right hand, the access site was visibly bleeding through the dressing. PCT #4 changed the dressing and the patient held pressure to their access sites again. At 10:23 a.m., PCT #4 reinforced the dressing. The patient removed the glove, gathered their belongings, ambulated to the scale, obtained their weight and left the treatment floor. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following the glove removal. B. Interviews i. On 3/3/25 at 1:54 p.m., an interview was conducted with PCT #2. PCT #2 stated after the patient’s access site was stabilized, the patient was to remove their glove and perform hand hygiene. PCT #2 stated if hand hygiene was not performed by the patient after holding their access sites there was a risk of contamination, infection and hepatitis (a serious liver infection). ii. On 3/4/25 at 11:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with PCT #5. PCT #5 stated after the patient’s access site was stabilized, the patient was to remove their glove and perform hand hygiene. PCT #5 stated there was a risk of cross-contamination if patients did not perform hand hygiene per policy, which could cause hepatitis, HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)(a virus that attacks and weakens the body’s immune system) and infection, which could cause death. iii. On 3/4/25 at 1:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN #7. RN #7 stated patients were to perform hand hygiene when they entered the treatment area and again before leaving the treatment area. RN #7 stated if a patient did not perform hand hygiene after glove removal there was a risk of infection, which could cause sepsis (bloodstream infection) and infection.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 947 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45020 Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure patient care staff cleaned and disinfected the patient treatment station chair per facility policy in three of four observations of dialysis station cleaning. Specifically, staff did not fully recline the dialysis chair to ensure all surfaces were cleaned. Findings include: Facility policy: The Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station policy read, the purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines to prevent the spread of infectious disease in accordance with appropriate regulations, and to maintain a clean, safe environment for patients, staff and visitors. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has regulations that in order to prevent cross contamination, a dialysis station must be cleaned and disinfected between dialysis patients. The chair and dialysis equipment are used by multiple patients during a treatment day and it is critical that these items be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected between uses. The steps to disinfect the dialysis station, which includes the dialysis chair, machine, television, IV pole, blood pressure cuff, hand sanitizer dispenser and holder, chaise wall behind chair. Place the chair in Trendelenburg position (flat on the back with the feet elevated above the head) and open side panels if the chair has swing open sides so all surfaces are accessible. Clean all surfaces. Make the surfaces glisteningly wet and allow to air dry. 1. The facility failed to ensure dialysis chairs were cleaned and disinfected between patient treatments according to facility policy. Direct patient care staff did not place the dialysis chair into the fully reclined position to ensure all surfaces of the chair were cleaned. A. Observations i. On 2/27/25 at 9:11 a.m., patient care technician (PCT) #6 was observed as they disinfected the dialysis chair at station #9. PCT #6 wiped all visible surfaces of the chair with a bleach solution and opened the side armrests to clean and disinfect the surfaces in between the chair and the armrest, however, they did not place the chair into a fully reclined position to wipe the crevices of the chair seat. After completing the dialysis chair disinfection, PCT #6 was asked if the head of the dialysis chair reclined further, and PCT #6 stated it did. PCT #6 pulled a lever located on the back of the chair and fully reclined the dialysis chair, then pulled the head of the chair back up while the dialysis chair continued to dry. ii. On 2/27/25 at 11:38 a.m., PCT #1 was observed as they disinfected the dialysis chair at station #19. PCT #1 wiped all visible surfaces of the chair with a bleach solution and opened the side armrests to clean and disinfect the surfaces in between the chair and the armrest, however, they did not place the chair into a fully reclined position to wipe the crevices of the chair seat. After completing the dialysis chair disinfection, PCT #1 was asked if the head of the dialysis chair reclined further, and PCT #1 stated it did. PCT #1 pulled a lever located on the back of the chair and fully reclined the dialysis chair, then pulled the head of the chair back up while the dialysis chair continued to dry. iii. On 3/3/25 at 9:06 a.m., PCT #4 was observed as they disinfected the dialysis chair at station #13. PCT #4 wiped all visible surfaces of the chair with a bleach solution and opened the side armrests to clean and disinfect the surfaces in between the chair and the armrest, however, they did not place the chair into a fully reclined position to wipe the crevices of the chair seat. After completing the dialysis chair disinfection, PCT #4 was asked if the head of the dialysis chair reclined further, and PCT #4 stated it did. PCT #4 pulled a lever located on the back of the chair and fully reclined the dialysis chair. These observations were in contrast to the Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station policy, which read, place the chair in Trendelenburg position so all surfaces were accessible. B. Interviews i. On 3/3/25 at 1:54 p.m., an interview was conducted with PCT #2. PCT #2 stated the process for a dialysis chair to be cleaned was to pull the lever on the back of the chair to completely recline it. PCT #2 stated it was important to clean dialysis chairs thoroughly between patients because there was a risk of infection. ii. On 3/4/25 at 11:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with PCT #5. PCT #5 stated the process for a dialysis chair to be cleaned was to pull the lever on the back of the chair to completely recline it. PCT #5 stated dialysis chairs were disinfected between patients because it prevented and minimized the risk of infection. iii. On 3/4/25 at 1:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with registered nurse (RN) #7. RN #7 stated dialysis chairs were to be cleaned after each use. RN #7 stated dialysis chairs were to be fully reclined with a lever on the back of the chair to ensure the crevice was fully disinfected. RN #7 stated if dialysis chairs were not cleaned per policy, there was an infection risk to the patients, which could cause death. These interviews were in contrast to the observations which revealed dialysis chairs were not fully reclined when cleaned and disinfected.”

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 4, 2025Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited
Mar 4, 2025Standard inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 14, 2005.
  • Run for profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 20 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (42 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 80% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Denver County, 9 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 7 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.