062536 Lamar Dialysis (Fmc)
A dialysis facility in Lamar, Colorado 81052
108 West Lee Ave, Lamar, Colorado 81052. (719) 336-1170.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.
- 5of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 2, 2025: a standard inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 2, 2025: standard inspection1 deficiency
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 815 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45020 Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure three of four patients, who were observed holding pressure to their access sites (locations where needles were inserted and then removed for treatment), performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves and prior to leaving the facility. Findings include: Facility policy: The Hand Hygiene policy read, the purpose of this policy is to prevent transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and staff through cross contamination. All staff, patients, patient care givers, including physicians and non-physician practitioners, social workers, dietitians, and any other indirect patient care staff must follow the same requirements for hand hygiene. Patients should perform hand hygiene if able, prior to and after each dialysis treatment. As needed, direct patient care staff will demonstrate how to operate the sinks, demonstrate hand washing to patients who are able to perform hand washing, and explain the risk of contamination with regard to their vascular access and hands to all patients. To help ensure the prevention of cross contamination to their family members or other patients, hand hygiene must be performed. 1. The facility failed to ensure patients performed hand hygiene following the removal of soiled gloves. A. Observations i. On 6/30/25 at 11:08 a.m., an observation was conducted at station #13. The patient was observed holding pressure to their own access site with a gloved left hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. At 11:20 a.m., after stabilization of the site, patient care technician (PCT) #1 applied a dressing to the site and removed the glove from the patient’s left hand. PCT #1 assisted the patient to a wheelchair, assisted the patient to the scale and obtained the patient’s weight. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene before leaving the facility. ii. On 6/30/25 at 12:39 p.m., an observation was conducted at station #9. The patient was observed holding pressure to their own access site with a gloved right hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. At 12:42 p.m., PCT #2 was observed assisting the patient with their access site that had bled through the gauze. PCT #2 cleaned blood from the patient’s arm, and the patient continued to apply pressure to their access site with their gloved right hand. At 12:52 p.m., after stabilization of the site, PCT #2 reinforced the dressing with gauze and tape. The patient then removed the soiled glove and, without performing hand hygiene, ambulated to the scale. A weight was obtained and the patient exited the facility. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following the glove removal. iii. On 6/30/25 at 1:23 p.m., an observation was conducted at station #8. The patient was observed holding pressure to their own access site with a gloved right hand following the removal of the needles used for treatment. At 1:25 p.m., after stabilization of the site, PCT #2 applied a dressing to the site. The patient then removed the soiled glove and without performing hand hygiene, ambulated to the scale and obtained their weight by pressing a button with their right hand. The patient exited the facility. Staff did not educate or request the patient to perform hand hygiene following the glove removal. This was in contrast to the Hand Hygiene policy which stated, to prevent transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and staff through cross contamination, all patients must follow the same requirements for hand hygiene. All patients should have performed hand hygiene after each dialysis treatment. Additionally, direct patient care staff should have explained to all patients the risk of contamination with regard to their vascular access and hands. B. Interviews i. On 7/2/25 at 8:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with PCT #3. PCT #3 stated after patients’ access sites were stabilized, patients were to perform hand hygiene before leaving the facility. PCT #3 stated hand hygiene was important for patients to perform because there was a risk of spreading germs at the scale or the door as they left the facility. PCT #3 stated there was a risk of infection, including hepatitis (inflammation of the liver). ii. On 7/2/25 at 7:57 a.m., an interview was conducted with registered nurse (RN) #4. RN #4 stated after a patient’s access site was stabilized, the expectation was for patients to perform hand hygiene after glove removal and for staff to remind them to do so. RN #4 stated if a patient did not perform hand hygiene after glove removal there was a risk of infection which could result in sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection) or hospitalization.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2025 | Standard inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Jul 2, 2025 | Standard inspection | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 17, 2001.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 5 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, worse than expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other dialysis facility CMS lists is in Prowers County.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.