Hearth Record

Spectrum Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Reseda, California 91335

18040 Sherman Way Suite 220, Reseda, California 91335. (818) 342-3012.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 27, 2026: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 17, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Cfc - Medical Records

    The inspectors’ words, 1,002 words

    “CFC-MEDICAL RECORDS CFR(s): 494.170 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 51860 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Patient 1’s beneficiary received requested medical records in a timely manner. The failure resulted in Patient 1’s beneficiary’s not being able to move forward in matters related to Patient 1’s death. Findings: During an interview on 7/15/25 at 2:40 p.m. with complainant Legal Assistant (LA) 1, LA 1 stated there had been a total of eight requests between 6/03/25 and 7/11/25 on Patient 1’s beneficiary’s behalf to obtain the medical records for the deceased Patient 1. During a record review of ‘State of California Certification of Vital Records, Conty of Los Angeles, Department of Public Health, Certificate of Death’, the Certificate of Death indicated Patient 1 expired on 11/26/24. Certificate of Death provided by LA 1. During a record review of Declaration of [Patient 1’s brother’s name] (As Successor in Interest to Patient 1), the Declaration indicates Patient 1’s brother states he is the Decedent’s Successor in Interest. Declaration provided by LA 1. During a record review of the letter an electronic mail (e-mail) thread for the dates of 6/05/25 to 7/11/25, the e-mail history indicates eight communications were sent to facility, six e-mails to Admissions Coordinator for Spectrum (ACS) and two letters sent to facility. During a review of Patient 1’s History and Physical (H&P, a formal and complete assessment of the patient and the problem) dated 4/17/24, the H&P indicates Patient was has a past medical history of the following but not limited to: hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), neuropathy coronary artery disease (a condition that negatively impacts the heart and blood vessels) with a heart angioplasty (a medical procedure that involves widening narrowed or blocked blood vessels) and a stent (a small, expandable tube made of metal or plastic mesh that is inserted into an artery to keep it open) placement, ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease - irreversible kidney damage) on hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). The H&P indicates Patient 1 receives home hemodialysis three times a week. During a review of Patient 1’s Home Hemodialysis (HHD) Treatment Flowsheet from his last hemodialysis treatment dated 11/26/24, the HHD Treatment Flowsheet indicates there were no complications noted during the hemodialysis treatment. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 1:30 p.m. with the Interim Facility Administrator (IFA), IFA stated the following: - Requests for copies of the medical record would be received by staff members and then forwarded the Vice President of Operations (VPO). - IFA stated Patient 1 would need to have signed release of information with the beneficiary’s name for the release of records process to begin. - IFA stated the release with beneficiary’s name would need to be signed while the patient was alive. - IFA stated a release of records would need to be signed and the request would be given to the VPO. - IFA states if after a patient expires and it turns out they (patient) has a Power of Attorney (POA) that is not mentioned on the admission forms, they (POA designee) are not given medical records. - IFA states the facility would need to see a POA before patient expires to release records after patient expires. - IFA states it would be the attending physician or the VPO who would decide to release records or not after patient expires and a POA is presented. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 1:40 p.m. with IFA, the IFA was provided with complainant’s documented request for medical records dated: 6/03/25, 6/05/25, 6/06/25, 6/10/25, 6/20/25, 6/27/25, 7/02/25, 7/07/25, and 7/11/25, along with a death certificate and a Successor in Interest document. IFA was shown the facility’s phone number which is to a call center. IFA was shown name of person who received mail and e-mail correspondence and stated ACS is the Admissions Coordinator. IFA stated there were too many requests for records and it was unfortunate situation was not resolved promptly. IFA stated would attempt to facilitate release of medical records promptly. During a review of the facility’s Privacy Notice, Uses and Disclosures of Health Information dated 7/10/24 and signed by Patient 1 7/10/24, the Privacy Notice indicates the following: - Your Rights: The health record is the physical property of the unit that compiled it. The information belongs to you. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO: “ Inspect and copy your health record as provided for in 45 CFR 164.528. “ The facility is responsible to: - Maintain the privacy of your health information, to use and disclose information only with your consent or authorization, unless there are exceptions described in this notice or otherwise allowed by related laws, rule, and regulations. “ Notify you if we are unable to agree to requested restrictions/s. - Report a problem - or if you have a question, or desire additional information, you may contact the Clinical Nurse Manager at: (818) 341 -XXXX or if you are not satisfied, contact: Security Officer - ACS 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/17/25 at 1:45 p.m. with Interim Facility Administrator (IFA), the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Patient Medical Records, adopted 7/31/24 was reviewed. The P&P indicated: - The facility maintains complete medical records on all patients in accordance with accepted professional standards, practices and state regulations. - Facility Administrator will serve as supervisor of medical records services and will ensure that all records are properly documented, completed, protected, and preserved. - Requests by patients to review their record will be referred to the attending physician. If the patient/responsible party wished to obtain a copy of their medical records, the VPO will be notified for guidance and approval. - Written consent of the patient, or of an authorized representative acting on behalf of the patient is required for the release of information.”

    Rule V0725. Condition-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 27, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 17, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 2, 2021.
  • Run for profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 1 dialysis station.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, worse than expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, worse than expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, worse than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, worse than expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Survey data not available for this reporting period.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 213 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Los Angeles County, 206 have a star rating from CMS: 18 rated 5 of 5, 32 rated 4 of 5, 85 rated 3 of 5, 43 rated 2 of 5, 28 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.