Hearth Record

Davita Valencia Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Santa Clarita, California 91350

26861 Bouquet Canyon Rd, Santa Clarita, California 91350. (661) 263-3216.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 6, 2024: a standard inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 6, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Ic - Hbv - Vaccinate Patients & Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 491 words

    “IC-HBV-VACCINATE PTS/STAFF CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Hepatitis B Vaccination Vaccinate all susceptible patients and staff members against hepatitis B. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38310 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of four sampled employees (Registered Nurse 1 [RN 1]), RN 1 had documentation of Hepatitis B (a serious liver infection caused by the hepatitis B virus) vaccination (administration of a vaccine [contain a microorganism or virus in a weakened, live, or killed state] to help the immune system develop immunity from a disease) and/or documentation of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) titer test (measures the level of antibodies in your blood to determine if you have immunity to the HBV) upon hire on 12/7/2015. This deficient practice had the potential for RN 1 being exposed to HBV, acquiring the infection and spreading the virus to vulnerable ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease) patients. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/2024 at 9:46 a.m., with Facility Administrator (FA), RN 1’s personnel files, was reviewed. The FA verified RN 1 was hired on 12/7/2015. The FA stated RN 1’s personnel file did not have documentation of RN 1’s proof of vaccination series for HBV and/or RN 1’s titers for HBV immunity. In the same interview on 12/5/2024 at 9:46 a.m., the FA stated RN 1 should have documentation of HBV screening upon hire. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Infection Control for Dialysis,” dated 4/2023, the P&P indicated the facility followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC - the nation’s leading science-based, data-driven, service organization that protects the public’s health) recommendations for preventing transmission of infections among chronic hemodialysis (a treatment that filters waste, salts, and fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to do so) patients. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Teammate Health Monitoring Program,” dated 4/2019, the P&P indicated the following: 1. Facility will regularly monitor staff for Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C, and tuberculosis, as indicated, based on immunity status, as required by state/local health departments. 2. New hires will be screened for HBV, Hepatitis C, and tuberculosis. 3. New hires will be offered the HBV vaccination series. During a review of a document titled, “CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a service organization that protects the public’s health) Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients,” dated 4/2001, the CDC document indicated the following: 1. Vaccinate against HBV to prevent transmission and revaccinate when serum anti-HBs titer falls below 10 milli-International Units per milliliters (mIU/ml, units of measurement). 2. The presence of anti-HBs typically indicates immunity against HBV infections. 3. The 3-dose Hep B vaccine series produces a protective antibody response (anti-HBs greater than 10 mIU/ml) in over 90% of adults. 4. HBV is recommended for both hemodialysis patients and staff members since the vaccine became available in 1982.”

    Rule V0126. Standard-level.

  • Medical Records - Complete, Accurate, Accessible

    The inspectors’ words, 1,227 words

    “MR-COMPLETE, ACCURATE, ACCESSIBLE CFR(s): 494.170 The dialysis facility must maintain complete, accurate, and accessible records on all patients, including home patients who elect to receive dialysis supplies and equipment from a supplier that is not a provider of ESRD services and all other home dialysis patients whose care is under the supervision of the facility. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38310 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records for one of five sampled patients (Patient 1), was accurate and complete. This deficient practice resulted in no documentation of Patient 1’s unwitnessed fall (an event which results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or floor or other lower level), in the lobby, on 11/1/2024, in which Patient 1 sustained injuries, which required hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Patient 1’s history and physical (H&P - a comprehensive assessment of a patient’s health that includes a medical history, physical exam, and documentation of findings), dated 11/1/2023, the H&P indicated Patient 1 had history of end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD - the final stage of chronic kidney disease, where the kidneys have permanently lost most of their function and can no longer adequately filter waste products from the blood and requires ongoing treatments, including dialysis or kidney transplantation, to maintain life), on hemodialysis (a medical treatment that removes waste products and excess fluids from the person’s blood, when the kidneys are unable to do so), with previous history of a stroke (occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain cells to die) and high blood pressure. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/2024 at 12:40 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Patient 1’s Treatment Report, dated 11/1/2023, was reviewed. RN 1 stated the Treatment orders indicated the following: 1. weight 65 kilograms, 2. dialyzer (a medical device that removes waste and excess fluid from the blood when a patient’s kidneys are unable to do so) F-180, 3. dialysate (a solution that is used in dialysis to filter waste products from the blood) 2 K (potassium, a mineral for nerves to function), CA (calcium, mineral for strong bones and teeth) 2.5, Bicarb (neutralizes acids) 35, blood flow rate 300 milliliters (ml), 4. dialysate flow rate 500 ml, 5. treatment duration 3 hours. Concurrently, RN 1 stated, after reviewing the video of the lobby during the time of Patient 1’s fall on 11/1/2023, Patient 1 was taken to the lobby, via wheelchair, by Patient Care Technician (PCT) 3, who handed patient (Patient 1) over to the transport staff, and returned to the treatment area. The transport staff was waiting for Patient 1, in the lobby, to transport the patient (Patient 1) back to the skilled nursing facility (SNF - convalescent hospitals, nursing home). Afterwards, the transport staff left Patient 1, alone in the lobby without notifying the facility staff, and went to get the vehicle. When the transport staff returned to the lobby, Patient 1 was found on the floor. Concurrently, RN 1 stated she (RN 1) was the nurse on duty on 11/1/2023, for Patient 1, and did not document in Patient 1’s medical record that Patient 1 fell, in the lobby, unwitnessed and unattended. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/2024 at 3:32 p.m. with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS), Patient 1’s Treatment Report, dated 11/1/2023, was reviewed. DCS stated RN 1 should have documented Patient 1’s fall on 11/1/2023, because 9-1-1 was called and Patient 1 was hospitalized with injuries. DCS also said that Patient 1 already had history of falls at home and thus admitted to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF, a type of inpatient facility that provides short or long-term skilled nursing care, and rehabilitation services to patients). During a review of the facility’s dialysis schedule, dated 11/1/2023, the dialysis schedule indicated the following: 1. Patient 1 was scheduled for third shift, start time of 12:00 p.m., end time for 3 p.m., and for three hours of dialysis. 2. RN 1 was the in-center hemodialysis nurse. 3. Patient Care Technician (PCT) 1 and 3 were on duty Concurrently, during review of Patient 1’s initial fall risk assessment, dated 4/26/2023, DCS stated patient’s total score was 9 (critical - high risk for falls). After patient fell at home, Patient 1’s fall risk assessment, dated 9/18/2023, was higher than initial score - 16. DCS stated after Patient 1 fell at home, Patient 1 was moved to a skilled nursing facility (nursing home). During further review of Patient 1’s History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/1/2023, documented by staff from the hospital where Patient 1 was admitted after the fall on 11/1/2023, the H&P indicated the following: 1. Patient 1 was brought into the hospital by ambulance, after having an episode of falling after completion of dialysis treatment. 2. Patient 1 had a large laceration and bruise on the right eyebrow, with bleeding in the brain - right subdural hematoma (a collection of blood that forms between the brain and the dura mater [the tough outer layer of the brain]) and right subarachnoid frontal lobe hemorrhage (a type of stroke that occurs when a blood vessel in the space between the brain and its protective membranes [subarachnoid space] ruptures). 3. Patient 1 was admitted to the intensive care unit with neurosurgery consulted. 4. Medical history included blunt head trauma (serious injury that occurs when the skull is struck by an external force that doesn’t break it but still moves the brain around), inability to walk, history of falls. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) regarding Medical Records, dated 10/2019, the P&P indicated the following: 1. The nurse is responsible for clinical care and is responsible for the supervision and authenticity of medical records services, in consultation with facility’s health information management department. 2. The custodian of medical records verifies that the medical records are complete, documented accurately, and maintained, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. 3. The custodian of medical records verifies that medical records contain pertinent medical information and verifies compliance with state specific regulations regarding medical records. During a review of the facility’s Progress Note policy, dated 10/2024, the policy indicated the following: 1. Notes are documented by the physician, nurse, dietician, and social worker. 2. Documentation needs to include treatment given or planned, patient encounters and the condition of the patient. 3. Notes are used to communicate information or to expand upon information or problems noted in other parts of the medical records or obtained from other sources, including consults, treatment records, etc. 4. Notes should include complete and pertinent information about the condition of the patient and should clearly portray the patient, the care and outcomes of that care. During a review of the facility’s Risk Event Management Reporting policy, dated 10/2024, the policy indicated the following: 1. Risk event is any unexpected event that is inconsistent with the routine operation of the facility, routine provision of acute dialysis treatment or ancillary renal related services that may be a risk event. 2. If a risk event involves a patient, completion of a risk event management report, does not eliminate the duty of recording appropriate entries in the patient’s medical record. 3. Only objective information directly relevant to the care and treatment of the patient is to be included in the medical record.”

    Rule V0726. Standard-level.

  • Gb - Responsible For Staff Oriented To Facility & Resp

    The inspectors’ words, 334 words

    “GOV-GB RESP FOR STAFF ORIENTATION CFR(s): 494.180(b)(3) The governing body or designated person responsible must ensure that- (3) All staff, including the medical director, have appropriate orientation to the facility and their work responsibilities; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38310 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for four of four sampled employees (Registered Nurse [RN] 1, RN 2, Patient Care Technician [PCT] 1, and the Registered Dietician [RD]) had documentation of the facility orientation for their work responsibilities. This deficient practice had the potential for hired employees (RN 1, RN 2, PCT 1 and the RD) to not be trained in performing their work responsibilities that could affect providing safe and quality care to the patients. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/2024 at 9:46 a.m. with the facility administrator (FA), four personnel files for RN 1, RN 2, PCT 1, and the RD were reviewed. The FA verified there was no documentation regarding the four identified staff’s orientation to the facility. The FA stated the following: 1. RN 1’s date of hire was 12/7/2015. There was no documentation of orientation to In-Center Hemodialysis Nurse. 2. RN 2’s date of hire was 10/31/2022. There was no documentation for orientation to Peritoneal Dialysis Nurse. 3. PCT 1’s date of hire was 6/1/2016. There was no documentation for orientation to Patient Care Technician. 4. The RD’s date of hire was 4/18/2017. There was no documentation for orientation to Registered Dietician. During an interview on 12/6/2024 at 3:00 p.m. with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS), the DCS stated the facility was unable to provide proof of facility orientation for work responsibilities or the above-mentioned personnel. The DCS stated the facility should have documentation for the four above-mentioned personnel’s orientation to ensure patients receive safe, efficient, high-quality care. In the same interview on 12/6/2024 at 3:00 p.m., the DCS stated the facility was not able to provide a policy regarding orientation and training of new employees.”

    Rule V0760. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 6, 2024Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited
Nov 20, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 1, 2020.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 12 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, worse than expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 213 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Los Angeles County, 206 have a star rating from CMS: 18 rated 5 of 5, 32 rated 4 of 5, 85 rated 3 of 5, 43 rated 2 of 5, 28 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.