Hearth Record

Shc San Jose LLC

A dialysis facility in San Jose, California 95128

888 South Bascom Ave, San Jose, California 95128. (408) 855-6900.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 11, 2025: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 11, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 962 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38573 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of care to ensure patient safety for one of three patients (Patient 1) receiving hemodialysis (medical procedure of removing waste products and excess fluid from a person’s blood through an artificial kidney) treatment. Patient 1’s lines was not clamped and resulted in blood loss. A Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT) cleaned up the blood but did not notify a nurse or provider about Patient 1’s blood loss. The failure of not communicating Patient 1’s blood loss had the potential of not having clear knowledge of the incident and not developing an appropriate corrective action plan. Findings: Review of Patient 1’s record indicated he had arteriovenous (AV) fistula (a surgical connection between an artery and a vein to access blood so it can be filtered through a dialysis machine) on his left upper arm. Review of Patient 1’s Hemodialysis Flowsheet Treatment Log Detail, (known as treatment record), dated 12/04/2024, indicated the patient started dialysis at 2:26 p.m. The treatment record nursing notes dated 12/04/24 at 3:47 p.m. indicated, “Per physician’s order, placed on O2 [oxygen] via nasal cannula” at 2 liters per minute. There was no documentation about blood loss or blood leaking in the nursing notes. The treatment record indicated his dialysis treatment ended on 12/4/24 at 6:46 p.m. The Post-Dialysis Comments indicated, “After tx [treatment] patient reported to me about a blood loss incident that happened 30 mins into start of tx at 2:45 p.m. today. I can’t say much about this since I have no idea about the incident at all until now.” Review of Patient 1’s Incident Report Summary, dated 12/4/24 indicated, “I checked on pt [patient] at 2 hrs [hours]into his tx [treatment] at around 16:25 [4:25 p.m.]. I noticed that pt had O2 on and pt told me that he had blood loss and feeling SOB [shortness of breath]. He showed me the picture that he took. It seemed mod amt of blood loss at the station floor ... He stated that luckily, he was awake to feel SOB and call [CCHT B] ... I was not informed about this incident from [CCHT B]. I found out from the pt ... [CCHT B] stated that the heparin line was not clamp and the cap came off for some reason ... He also stated that it was small amt. [amount] of blood, and he cleaned it up. Notified CM [Center Manager] at 19:00 [7 p.m.].” During an interview on 12/9/24 at 11:56 a.m., with Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician B (CCHT B), he acknowledged that he was the CCHT assigned to Patient 1 on 12/4/24 when Patient 1 had blood loss. He stated that Patient 1 called him and pointed to the blood leaking from his dialysis line and onto the floor. CCHT B further stated that he cleaned up the blood and did not notify Registered Nurse A (RN A) about Patient 1’s blood loss. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/9/24 at 12:06 p.m., with RN A, she reviewed Patient 1’s incident report summary and she stated that on 12/4/24 at around 4:25 p.m., she checked Patient 1 at two hours into his treatment and she noticed that Patient 1 had O2 on. Patient 1 told RN A that he was having shortness of breath and called CCHT assigned to him. RN A further stated that CCHT B did not notify her about the incident and Patient 1 showed the picture that he took of the blood on the floor. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/9/24 at 12:10 p.m., with RN A of Patient 1’s Hemodialysis Flowsheet Treatment Log, RN stated she had a late entry note dated 12/5/24 at 11:16 a.m., for 12/4/24 at 4:25 p.m. The note indicated that RN A noticed Patient 1 had O2 on and Patient 1 reported he had lost blood 30 minutes into treatment and was having shortness of breath. RN A further stated that she notified the physician (MD) on 12/5/24 at 11 a.m., regarding the above incident and the MD told RN A that Patient 1 was at VMC for abdominal pain. When RN A asked the CCHT B about the incident, the CCHT stated that the heparin line was not clamp and the cap came off for some reason. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/9/24 at 4:46 p.m., with RN C, RN C stated that on 12/4/24 at 6:01 p.m., the CCHT D told her that Patient 1 wants to talk to her and Patient 1 showed RN C the two pictures of the blood. She stated approximately 200 ml to 300 ml of blood was leaking from the site and onto the floor. She stated she was freaking out by looking blood in the pictures. She further stated that she called RN A about the blood loss and told RN A to notify the Center Manager (CM) and the Physician. Review of the facility’s policy, “Blood Loss,” revised 7/2023, indicated for incident reporting purposes, blood loss is defined as equal or greater than 100 mL. The policy also indicated, “Procedure 7. Inform charge nurse and physician /advanced practice provider (APP) immediately. Follow physician orders ... 8. Closely monitor patient; do not leave patient unattended. 9. Document events on the flow sheet. Complete an occurrence an occurrence/incident report for follow up and evaluation by QAPI team /Safety Officer.””

    Rule V0715. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 11, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 2, 2014.
  • Run as a non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: US Renal Care, Inc.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 25 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the US Renal Care, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (65 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 71% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 31 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Santa Clara County, 27 have a star rating from CMS: 5 rated 5 of 5, 12 rated 4 of 5, 7 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.