Hearth Record

San Gabriel Nephrology Services, LLC

A dialysis facility in San Gabriel, California 91776

801 S. San Gabriel Blvd., San Gabriel, California 91776. (626) 285-1830.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 10, 2025: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 10, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Compliance With Fed/State/Local Laws

    The inspectors’ words, 254 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH FED/STATE/LOCAL LAWS CFR(s): 494.20 The facility and its staff must operate and furnish services in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations pertaining to licensure and any other relevant health and safety requirements. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51860 Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility’s most current CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) QIP (Quality Incentive Program) Performance Score Certificate was posted in a place accessible to the patients. QIP scores penalize facilities for poor performance and rewards high performance, with results publicly reported. The deficient practice had the potential for patients and visitors to not be informed of the facility’s standing in regard to Clinical Measures of Quality ratings. Findings: During an observation on 12/10/2025 at 1:00 p.m. in the facility’s waiting area, a CMS QIP Performance Score Certificate observed. The certificate was dated for the performance year 2014. The certificate indicated the data Clinical Measures of Quality are from the year 2012. During a review of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 42 CFR § 413.178(f)(3) indicated, “CMS will provide each ESRD facility with a performance score certificate on an annual basis that describes the TPS achieved by the facility with respect to a payment year. The performance score certificate must be posted by the ESRD facility within 15 business days of the date that CMS issues the certificate to the ESRD facility, with the content unaltered, in an area of the facility accessible to patients.””

    Rule V0101. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Ic - Sanitary Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 286 words

    “IC-SANITARY ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.30 The dialysis facility must provide and monitor a sanitary environment to minimize the transmission of infectious agents within and between the unit and any adjacent hospital or other public areas. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51860 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled rooms in the dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) facility was cleaned in accordance to the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) when debris (scattered pieces of waste) was found in various areas of the Reverse Osmosis (RO - a process of purifying water) room floor. This failure had the potential for the RO room to develop and spread acquired infections to the patients and staff or to attract roaches and rodents to the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/10/2025 at 2:40 p.m. with Facility Administrator (FA) 1 in the RO room, the floor of the RO room had various areas with debris. FA 1 stated housekeeping addressed trash in the RO room. FA 1 stated the RO room was not a patient care area and would not be cleaned by housekeeping until the end of day. FA 1 stated the priority for housekeeping was to keep patient care areas clean. FA 1 stated the RO room floor could be better kept, especially with the past history of roaches in the dialysis unit. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Dialysis Facility Cleaning,” dated 12/01/2009, the P&P indicated, “Scheduling and Description of Services ...h. Water Treatment Areas, i. Nightly, a.) Dust and wet mop floor.””

    Rule V0111. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Carbon Adsorption - Monitoring, Testing Frequency

    The inspectors’ words, 723 words

    “CARBON ADSORP-MONITOR, TEST FREQUENCY CFR(s): 494.40(a) 6.2.5 Carbon adsorption: monitoring, testing freq Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be performed at the beginning of each treatment day prior to patients initiating treatment and again prior to the beginning of each patient shift. If there are no set patient shifts, testing should be performed approximately every 4 hours. Results of monitoring of free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be recorded in a log sheet. Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine can be accomplished using the N.N-diethyl-p-phenylene-diamine (DPD) based test kits or dip-and-read test strips. On-line monitors can be used to measure chloramine concentrations. Whichever test system is used, it must have sufficient sensitivity and specificity to resolve the maximum levels described in [AAMI] 4.1.1 (Table 1) [which is a maximum level of 0.1 mg/L]. Samples should be drawn when the system has been operating for at least 15 minutes. The analysis should be performed on-site, since chloramine levels will decrease if the sample is not assayed promptly. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51860 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform chlorine (a chemical found in water, which in large amounts can negatively impact the dialysis treatment) testing per the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) on 45 out of 45 sampled days when either chlorine tests were not done, the testing dates were not entered, or the required licensed person’s signature was not entered in the chlorine log sheets. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the well-being of the patients during their dialysis treatments. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/2025 at 4:10 p.m. with FA 1, the Daily Total Chlorine Testing Log book was reviewed. The book contained an accumulation the year’s weekly chlorine checks performed daily before each set of patients arrive (shifts). Each Daily Total Chlorine Testing Log sheet (log sheet) represented 6 days of chlorine testing with spaces marked for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday and 4 chlorine testing times per day with printed entry times marked as Opening, 1st Shift, 2nd Shift, 3rd Shift, 4th shift, and 5th Shift. The Daily Total Chlorine Testing Log sheets indicated: 1. For 43 out of the 45 sampled dates, the dates of testing were missing. 2. For six out of 45 sampled dates, the chlorine checks were missing at the 2nd and 3rd shift times. 3. For 39 out of 45 sampled dates, the “Licensed Person Verifying Result’s Are Appropriate” signature was missing. During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 2:45 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated he had not been able to sign off in the licensed person’s line on the Daily Total Chlorine Testing Log sheet today due to being busy with patient care. RN 1 stated water chlorine checks were important because otherwise the patient could get hemolysis (the breakdown of red blood cells) during the dialysis treatment or patients could develop sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), fever (a rise in body temperature), or chills (a sensation of cold accompanied by shivering). During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/2025 at 4:15 p.m. with FA 1, the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Daily Water System Total Chlorine Monitoring,” dated 12/01/2009, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, “If the results of the Total Chlorine testing from the primary carbon filter or set of tanks indicted a level of less than or equal to 0.1 ppm (</= 0.1 ppm), no additional testing is needed until the next patient shift and the results are recorded in the “Daily Water Treatment Log - Routine Total Chlorine Testing” log which contains entries for day, date, patient shift, test time, results, signature of person performing the test and signature of licensed nurse verifying that daily log is completed and results appropriate.” FA 1 stated the chlorine monitoring was important in the dialysis setting and not having correct testing could hurt the patients badly. FA 1 verified the P&P was not followed. FA 1 stated she knew the chlorine checks were completed although the log sheet was not filled out correctly due to staff error. FA 1 verified the omission of dates on the chlorine log sheets would not allow a person to verify which day the daily log entry corresponded to.”

    Rule V0196. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Oct 17, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 320 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42937 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by leaving two (2) unsecured oxygen cylinder tank in the patient care area. This deficient practice had the potential risk for trips and fall for staff, patients, and visitors, in the event the unsecured oxygen cylinder tank falls or tip over. In addition, if it falls and breaks, it can cause pressurized oxygen to escape rapidly. This pressure can cause the tank to fly through the air, which may cause patient/staff/visitor injury. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 10/15/2024 at 3:26 p.m. with the Facility Administrator (FA), it was observed that there were (2) unsecured oxygen cylinder tank in the patient care area. The FA stated that the (2) oxygen cylinder tank should have been strapped to the oxygen wall bracket. Strapping the oxygen tank to the wall bracket keeps the oxygen cylinder secure and prevents it from falling or tipping over. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/17/2024 at 3:30 p.m. with the FA (Facility Administrator), the Monthly Environmental Building Safety and Fire Inspection Checklist, was reviewed. It was noted that the checklist was completed on 10/1/2024. Securing and strapping oxygen cylinder tank was not part of the checklist. During the same interview on 10/17/2024 at 3:30 p.m. with the FA (Facility Administrator (FA) stated that the purpose of the checklist was for facility leaders to do a monthly environmental round and follow the checklist to ensure the safety and well-being of patients, staff, and visitors. FA added that checking to make sure that oxygen cylinder tank was secured and strapped to the wall bracket should have been part of the checklist.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

All 9 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 10, 2025Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited
Oct 17, 2024Standard inspection1 deficiency cited
Aug 28, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 20, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 19, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 18, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 16, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 19, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 30, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jun 4, 2010.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 36 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS lists it as independent, not owned or managed by a chain.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, worse than expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, better than expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, worse than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (34 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 36% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 213 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Los Angeles County, 206 have a star rating from CMS: 18 rated 5 of 5, 32 rated 4 of 5, 85 rated 3 of 5, 43 rated 2 of 5, 28 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.