Davita Northeast Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Bakersfield, California 93306
3501 Mall View Rd, Ste 109, Bakersfield, California 93306. (661) 872-3580.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 38 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 8, 2024: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 8, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Hbv - Isolation Of Machines/Equipment/Supplies
The inspectors’ words, 328 words
“IC-HBV-ISOLATION-MACHINES/EQUIP/SUPPLIES CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Isolation of HBV+ Patients To isolate HBsAg positive patients, ... dedicate machines, equipment, instruments, supplies, and medications that will not be used by HBV susceptible patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32234 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two isolation rooms and all the equipment in the isolation room were clearly labeled as “isolation”. This failure had the potential for the staff to use the equipment in other areas of the facility resulting in transmission and spread of infectious diseases to patients and staff. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/8/24 at 3:30 p.m. in Isolation Room # 2, with Clinical Manager (CM), the Isolation Room # 2 was not labeled as “Isolation.” A blood pressure (BP) cuff was noted to be unlabeled as “Isolation.” CM stated Isolation Room # 2 and the BP cuff inside Isolation Room # 2 should have been labeled as “Isolation.” CM stated the facility had two isolation rooms. During an interview on 11/8/24 a 4:30 p.m. with Facility Administrator (FA), FA stated, “We have three Hepatitis B (an infection of the liver caused by the Hepatitis B virus and is a contagious liver infection spread from person-to-person via blood or body fluids) isolation patients.” FA verified and stated all the isolation rooms and all isolation equipment needed to be labeled as “Isolation.” During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Hepatitis B Surveillance, Vaccination, Infection Control Measures and Isolation Guidance,” dated 4/24, the P&P indicated, “Dialyzing Confirmed Positive or Suspected/Unknown Status. . .Location. . .Isolation room or designated isolation area. . .Duration. . . Long term use. . .19. Equipment/ Supplies a. Dedicated ancillary supplies such as blood pressure cuffs. . .b. Such supplies will be labeled “isolation” and will remain in isolation room/area or station and will be disinfected after every patient use with a 1:100 (one to one hundred) bleach solution.””
-
Carbon Adsorption - Monitoring, Testing Frequency
The inspectors’ words, 448 words
“CARBON ADSORP-MONITOR, TEST FREQUENCY CFR(s): 494.40(a) 6.2.5 Carbon adsorption: monitoring, testing freq Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be performed at the beginning of each treatment day prior to patients initiating treatment and again prior to the beginning of each patient shift. If there are no set patient shifts, testing should be performed approximately every 4 hours. Results of monitoring of free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be recorded in a log sheet. Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine can be accomplished using the N.N-diethyl-p-phenylene-diamine (DPD) based test kits or dip-and-read test strips. On-line monitors can be used to measure chloramine concentrations. Whichever test system is used, it must have sufficient sensitivity and specificity to resolve the maximum levels described in [AAMI] 4.1.1 (Table 1) [which is a maximum level of 0.1 mg/L]. Samples should be drawn when the system has been operating for at least 15 minutes. The analysis should be performed on-site, since chloramine levels will decrease if the sample is not assayed promptly. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32234 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures (P&P) titled “Routine Total Chlorine Testing Log” when one of six chlorine tests on 10/12/24 was not completed. This failure had the potential for unsafe chlorine levels which has the potential for adverse effects to the patients. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/8/24 at 2:55 p.m. with Clinical Manager (CM), the facility’s log titled “Routine Total Chlorine Testing Log (RTCT),” dated October 2024 was reviewed. The RTCT indicated for the week of 10/7/24 to 10/12/24 the total chlorine test was missing and was not done on 10/12/24 at 4 p.m. CM stated the water system total chlorine testing should be done every four hours (total of six times a day) by the Patient Care Technician (PCT) with the licensed nurse. CM stated, “All chlorine test is signed by the PCT and the licensed nurse.” During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Daily Water System Total Chlorine Monitoring,” dated 10/24, the P&P indicated, “. . .Total Chlorine testing is done on a daily basis prior to the use of dialysis quality water for any process and the start of dialysis treatment(s) and within every four (4) hours until all activities that require use of dialysis quality water are completed. . .11...Record results on the “Routine Total Chlorine Testing” log which contains entries for day, date, test number, test time, signature of person performing the test, test results, and signature of licensed nurse verifying that each test on the daily log is complete and results appropriate.””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 14, 1998.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 38 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, worse than expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (55 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 86% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 18 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Kern County, 17 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 9 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.