Hearth Record

Davita Doctors Dialysis Center of Montebello

A dialysis facility in Montebello, California 90640

1721 W. Whittier Blvd., Montebello, California 90640. (323) 722-1116.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 26, 2024: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 26, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Idt Develops Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,037 words

    “POC-IDT DEVELOPS PLAN OF CARE CFR(s): 494.90(a) The interdisciplinary team must develop a plan of care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36206 Based on interview and record review, the Interdisciplinary Team (Nursing, Social Worker, Physician, Dietitian) failed to conduct re-evaluation or reassessment and formulate a plan of care (or treatment plan) for one of one sampled patient (Patient 1), after Patient 1 was hospitalized for over a month, and returned to the facility for hemodialysis (replaces the work of the kidneys to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood) treatment. This deficient practice had the potential for the Patient’s needs not to be met. Findings: During an interview on 9/26/2024 at 1:42 pm, with the Registered Nurse (RN), the RN stated the following: Prior to Patient 1’s hospitalization in Janurary 2024, Patient 1 was receiving hemodialysis (HD) treatments on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Patient 1 suffered a stroke (poor blood flow to the brain) and was hospitalized in January 2024. Patient 1 returned in March 2024 for HD treatment and was suffering from fluid overfload (too much fluid volume in the blood), which resulted in Patient 1 receiving an additional HD treatment on Saturdays. Patient 1 passed away in August 2024. During an interview on 9/26/2024 at 1:232 pm, with the Facility Administrator (FA), the FA stated the following: Patient 1 was hospitalized for one month and Patient 1’s condition went “south (worsened).” Patient 1 was receiving four treatments a week, instead of three, due to issues with fluid overload. Patient 1 was also having issues with housing and was at risk of being homeless. During an interview with Social Worker on 9/30/2024 at 9:01 am, the SW stated the following: Patients are required to have an initial evaluation by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, nursing, social work, physician, and destitution) on all new patients, after 90 days, annually, and after a patient has been hospitalized. SW stated Patient 1 was hospitalized from 1/29/2024 through 3/21/2024. Patient 1 returned to the facility on 3/22/2024. Patient 1 required a re-evaluation by the IDT which included a social worker evaluation, which assesses the patient’s needs such as, social support, insurance issues, education, cash assistance, resources for housing and transportation, and emotional support, and coping skills. SW stated Patient 1 was provided with resources for housing and cash assistance after returning to the facility after Patient 1’s hospitalization. The SW confirmed that the IDT re-evaluation or re-assessment was not done for Patient 1 upon returning to the facility on 3/22/2024, should have been done to assist Patient 1 with any needs Patient 1 may have. During a second interview with Social Worker, on 9/30/2024 at 3:27 pm, the SW stated the following: There was no current IDT Plan of Care for Patient 1, addressing needs after Patient 1’s hospitalization. The last IDT Plan Of Care was dated 12/11/2023. Patient 1 was discharged from the facility because of a prolonged hospitalization from 1/29/2024 and returned to the facility on 3/22/2024. Due to the prolonged hospitalization, the patient was considered a new patient and Patient 1 should have had a comprehensive assessment by the IDT and a new Plan of Care should have been formulated, because Patient 1’s condition may have changed. During an interview with the Facility Administrator (FA) on 10/22/2024 at 9:03 am, the FA stated the following: Patients are considered discharged or inactive if patient has not received any treatment at the facility in 30 days. When a patient returns to the facility, patient is considered to be a new patient, and a re-evaluation or re-assessment is required. The computer system should trigger the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) to conduct an assessment. The team assessment is completed by the social worker, dietitian, physician, and nursing to identify any changes in the patient’s condition after hospitalization. FA verified that the computer system did not trigger the IDT to perform an assessment. The IDT assessment and IDT Plan of Care was missed and not completed by the team. During a review of Patient 1’s “Patient Summary of Information Sheet,” the Summary indicated Dialysis began on 1/13/2020, with an Anticipated Restart Date of 3/22/2024. Renal Function Status: ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease, final stage of chronic kidney disease, kidneys stop functioning). Discharge Date: 8/26/2024. During a review of Patient 1’s “Patient Plan of Care,” dated 12/11/2023, the Plan of Care indicated the following: An IDT met. Patient (1) stable. The Plan of Care addressed topics such as Patient 1’s hemodialysis access site, anemia, fluid and blood pressure, nutrition, psychosocial (coping skills, resources), rehabilitation, and transplant options. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Patient Assessment and Plan of Care,” dated 10/2024, the P&P indicated the following. Assessment: 1. The facility’s interdisciplinary team (IDT) consist of at a minimum, the patient or the patient’s personal representative, a registered nurse, a physician or Non-physician Practitioner (NPP)..., a social worker, and a qualified renal dietitian per CMS (Medicare and Medicaid Services, a federal healthcare regulatory agency). 2. The interdisciplinary team is responsible for providing each patient with an individualized and comprehensive assessment documenting his/her needs. The comprehensive assessment will be used to develop the patient’s treatment plan and expectations for care. 3. Assessment criteria will include, but not limited to, evaluation of: - Current health status and medical condition, including co-morbid conditions. - Dialysis prescription, blood pressure, and fluid management. - Laboratory results... - Factor associated with anemia (deficiency in red blood cells)... - Nutritional status by dietitian... - Psychosocial needs by a social worker... - Family and other support systems... - Current patient physical activity level... 7. A comprehensive re-assessment of each patient and a revision in the plan of care will be conducted...At least monthly for unstable patients including, but not limited to, patient with the following: - Extended or frequent hospitalization. - Marked deterioration in health status. - Significant changes in psychosocial needs... 15. Assessment and Plans of care for Hospitalized Patients: Patients who are hospitalized at any time during the routine expected IDT Patient Assessment and Plan of Care process will not have an assessment and plan of care completed by the IDT until the patient returns from hospitalization.”

    Rule V0542. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 26, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 3, 1996.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 26 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (40 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 73% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 213 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Los Angeles County, 206 have a star rating from CMS: 18 rated 5 of 5, 32 rated 4 of 5, 85 rated 3 of 5, 43 rated 2 of 5, 28 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.