Davita Antelope Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Citrus Heights, California 95621
6406 Tupelo Drive Ste-A, Citrus Heights, California 95621. (916) 721-1800.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 31 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 18, 2024: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 18, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Cdc Mmwr 2001
The inspectors’ words, 528 words
“IC-CDC MMWR 2001 CFR(s): 494.30(a) The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (1)(i) The recommendations (with the exception of screening for hepatitis C), found in “Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients,” developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, volume 50, number RR05, April 27, 2001, pages 18 to 28. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. This publication is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Central Building, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Copies may be obtained at the CMS Information Resource Center. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_regulations/ibr_locations.html. The recommendation found under section header “HBV-Infected Patients”, found on pages 27 and 28 of RR05 (“Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients”), concerning isolation rooms, must be complied with by February 9, 2009. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45718 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control precautions when used needles were found on top of two Hemodialysis (Artificial means of kidney function that cleanses the blood by passing it through a filter called a DIALYZER) machine blood pumps. This failure had the potential to transmit infectious diseases. Findings: During an observation on 1/18/24 at 10:18 a.m., a used needle was found on the top of Patient 1’s hemodialysis machine blood pump. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/18/24 at 10:32 a.m., the Licensed Nurse (LN 1), verified there was a used needle on the top of Patient 1’s hemodialysis machine blood pump while he was having hemodialysis. She stated, “they [staff] forgot to throw it away ...it should not be there.” LN 1 proceeded with throwing the needle in the sharps container bin. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 10:40 a.m., a used needle was found on the top of Patient 2’s hemodialysis machine blood pump. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/18/24 at 10:42 a.m., the Patient Care Technician (PCT 1), verified there was a used needle on the top of Patient 2’s hemodialysis machine blood pump. She stated, it’s supposed to be in the sharps container. She further stated, “it is important to throw it away so that we don’t accidentally get pricked, it’s for patient’s safety”. PCT 1 proceeded with throwing the needle in the sharps container bin. During an interview on 1/18/24 at 12:43 p.m., the Facility Administrator (FA) stated, she expected the staff to dispose of used needles in the sharps container immediately and not leave them on top of the machine. A review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, “GUIDE TO INFECTION PREVENTION FOR OUTPATIENT SETTINGS: MINIMUM EXPECTATIONS FOR SAFE CARE”, version 2.3 September 2016, indicated, “ ...Key recommendations for safe injection practices in outpatient settings ...8. Dispose of used sharps at the point of use in a sharps container that is closable, puncture-resistant, and leak-proof ...” https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/outpatient/guide.pdf”
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 571 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45718 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement standards of infection control precautions when: 1.Two Patient Care Technicians (PCT) did not perform hand hygiene (includes either washing with soap and water or using an approved alcohol-based hand gel) in between glove change on multiple occasions while caring for patients with on-going Hemodialysis (HD, Artificial means of kidney function that cleanses the blood by passing it through a filter called a DIALYZER), and 2. A PCT used inappropriately covered hand when touching a hemodialysis machine in use. These failures had the potential to increase the patients’ risk for infections and cross contamination. Findings: 1.During an observation on 1/18/24 at 10:30 a.m., in the treatment area, PCT 1 was observed starting a patient on HD. PCT 1 placed the blood pressure cuff on the patient. PCT 1 then proceeded to type on the clean chair side computer while still wearing the same used gloves. PCT 1 removed her gloves and did not perform hand hygiene thereafter. During further observation on 1/18/24 at 10:32 a.m., PCT 1 was observed wearing a new pair of gloves and pressed the HD machine. She then removed her gloves, went to another patient and wore new gloves without performing hand hygiene in between glove change. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 11:15 a.m., PCT 2 was observed removing his used gloves and grabbing clean supplies in the clean area. PCT 2 then proceeded to a patient and wore new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene in between tasks and glove change. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 11:53 a.m., PCT 2 was observed removing used dialysis lines from HD machine. PCT 2 proceeded to throw the lines in the garbage bin, removed gloves, went to type on the clean chairside computer. PCT 2 did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks and glove change. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 12:03 p.m., PCT 2 removed his gloves after cleaning the HD machine and proceeded to prepare supplies in the clean supply area without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 1/18/24 at 12:43 p.m., the Facility Administrator (FA) stated, the staff needed to change gloves every time they go to a new machine and hand sanitize in between changing gloves. 2. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 11:55 a.m., PCT 2 was observed pressing the machine alarm where a patient was dialyzing with only the index finger covered with gloves. PCT 2 then proceeded to remove the gloves on his index finger and did not perform hand hygiene thereafter. During an interview on 1/18/24 at 12:43 p.m., the Facility Administrator (FA) stated, the staff needed to wear gloves properly when they are touching the machine. The FA stated, the gloves should be on their hand and not in their index finger only. A review of the facility policy titled, “INFECTION CONTROL FOR DIALYSIS FACILITIES”, revised April 2023, indicated, “ ...HAND HYGIENE ...1. All teammates ...will perform hand hygiene ...b. prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves ...d. after patient and dialysis delivery system contact ...g. before touching clean areas such as supplies, supply cart and chairside keyboard/mouse ...””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jun 15, 1987.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 31 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (45 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 64% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 32 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Sacramento County, 31 have a star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 16 rated 3 of 5, 5 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.