Davita Central Mesa Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Mesa, Arizona 85203
1134 E University Dr Ste 101, Mesa, Arizona 85203. (480) 464-3851.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 24 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Feb 29, 2024: a standard inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Feb 29, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Ic - Cdc Mmwr 2001
The inspectors’ words, 418 words
“IC-CDC MMWR 2001 CFR(s): 494.30(a) The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (1)(i) The recommendations (with the exception of screening for hepatitis C), found in “Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients,” developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, volume 50, number RR05, April 27, 2001, pages 18 to 28. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. This publication is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Central Building, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Copies may be obtained at the CMS Information Resource Center. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_regulations/ibr_locations.html. The recommendation found under section header “HBV-Infected Patients”, found on pages 27 and 28 of RR05 (“Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients”), concerning isolation rooms, must be complied with by February 9, 2009. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49430 Based on review of policy/procedure, observation, and staff interview, it was determined by the department that the facility administrator failed to ensure staff appropriately cleansed (2) of (2) patients’ (Patient’s #) vascular access prior to cannulation with fistula needles. Failure to practice safe aseptic technique when cleansing and disinfecting a patient’s vascular access increases the risk for vascular access and blood stream infection. The facility policy titled “Assessment and Cannulation for AV Fistula/Graft and Patient Self Cannulation” requires “...cleanse the site by applying skin antiseptic using a circular motion, moving from the center out and allow to dry. (for contact and dry time refer to the table...) ...Iodine...30 second contact time...Alcohol...60 second contact time...”. Observation on 02/27/24 revealed Employee #5 access a patient’s (Patient #1) fistula site at chair #12. Employee #5 scrubbed the entire site for 6 seconds with and alcohol pad then scrubbed each individual site for 24sec with iodine pads then preceded to cannulate both, red and blue needle sites. Observation on 02/27/24, revealed Employee #6 prepared to cannulate Patient #’15’s vascular access. Employee #6 used an alcohol pad to disinfect the arterial cannulation site for 5 seconds prior to cannulating the site. Employee #6 used an alcohol pad to disinfect the venous cannulation site for 5 seconds prior to cannulating the site. Employee #1 confirmed on 02/27/2024 and that this practice was not following facility policy.”
-
Receive Services Outlined In Poc
The inspectors’ words, 288 words
“PR-RECEIVE SERVICES OUTLINED IN POC CFR(s): 494.70(a)(12) The patient has the right to- (12) Receive the necessary services outlined in the patient plan of care described in §494.90; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49430 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that the administrator failed to ensure: 1. staff administered treatment medication for hypertension as ordered by the patient’s nephrologist for (2) of (6) patient (Patient #1 and #5) which has the potential risk to patients for adverse outcomes related to untreated hypertension 2. Staff administered heparin infusions per physician order during treatment for (5) of (6) patients (Patients #1, #2, #3, #5 and #6). Findings include: 1. The facility document “SKI/DaVita PRN Panel” requires: “...Medication...Clonidine...0.1 mg PO...0.10 mg for systolic BP (greater than or equal to) 180 and/or diastolic (greater than or equal to)110 after 60 minutes on treatment. May repeat X 1 after one hour if BP remains (greater than or equal to)180 and/or diastolic (greater than or equal to) 110....” 2. Facility policy titled “Anticoagulation” requires “ ...Heparin is administered per physician’s order ....stop/discontinuation time ...” 2. Physician , for all patients receiving heaparin infusions during treatment, reads, “Stop time for hourly does before end of treatment: 60 minutes”. 1. Patient treatment sheets revealed systolic BP (greater than or equal to) 180 and/or diastolic (greater than or equal to)110 after 60 minutes on treatment without assessment or interventions documented. 2. Patient treatment sheets revealed heparin infusions were not discontinued 60 minutes prior to end of treatment. Employee #1 confirmed in an interview on 02/28/2024, that this practice of not administering Clonidine for hypertension and not discontinuing heparin infusion 60 minutes prior to end of treatment was not following physician orders.”
-
Appropriateness Of Dialysis Rx
The inspectors’ words, 191 words
“PA-APPROPRIATENESS OF DIALYSIS RX CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: (2) Evaluation of the appropriateness of the dialysis prescription, This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49430 Based on review of facility policy, medical records and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff followed the attending physicians prescribed hemodialysis (HD) order for blood flow rate and/or temperature setting for (5) of (6) patients. Failure to follow physician orders poses the potential risk of inadequate dialysis, decreased clearances and hospitalizations. Findings Include: Facility policy titled “PRE-INTRA-POST TREATMENT DATA COLLECTION, MONITORING AND NURSING ASSESSMENT” requires ...”prescription and machine settings are verified by teammate prior to initiation of treatment with the exception of blood flow rate which is verified and documented when the ordered rate is obtained after onset of treatment....”. Review of patient treatment sheets revealed (5) of (6) patients had documented blood flow rates or machine temperatures (greater than .5 degree from physician order) documented across multiple treatment sheets. Employee #1 confirmed in an interview 02/28/2024 that this practice was not following facility policy or physician orders.”
-
Assess B/P & Fluid Management Needs
The inspectors’ words, 355 words
“PA-ASSESS B/P, FLUID MANAGEMENT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Blood pressure, and fluid management needs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49430 Based on a review of facility policy, medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to require clinical staff to notify the nurse and the nurse provide a documented intervention for 6 out of 6 patients reviewed when the patient’s blood pressure (BP) and/or heart rate (HR) was out of range and/or vital signs were not preformed within a 30 minute interval per the facility policy, which poses the potential risk of cardiovascular compromise and hospitalization. Findings include: Facility policy titled “PRE-INTRA-POST TREATMENT DATA COLLECTION, MONITORING AND NURSING ASSESSMENT” requires “...Vital signs and treatment monitoring...completed at least every thirty (30) minutes...the following are considered abnormal findings and should be reported to the licensed nurse and documented in the patient’s medical record...Post-treatment: If patient is above or below 1 kg from the target weight...Pre-dialysis: Systolic greater the 180 mm Hg or less than 90 mm Hg...Diastolic greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg...Intradialytic: Difference of 20 mm Hg increase or decrease from patient’s last intradialytic treatment BP reading...Post Treatment: Standing systolic BP greater than 140 mm Hg or less than 90 mm Hg...Standing diastolic BP greater than 90 mm Hg or less than 50 mm HG...Heart or Pulse Rate Pre/Intra/Post: Less than 60 beats per minute or greater than 100 beats per minute...”. Facility document titled “SKI/Da Vita PRN Medication Panel” requires “...Clonidine...0.10 mg for systolic BP>180 and/or diastolic >110 after 60 minutes on treatment. May repeat X 1 after one hour if BP remains >180 and/or diastolic >110...”. Medical record review of 6 patient’s treatment sheets revealed all (6/6) patients had multiple occurrences of blood pressures, heart rates, vital signs greater than 30-minute intervals and weights 1 kg off from their prescribed target weight without documentation of the licensed nurse being notified or the licensed nurse assessing the occurrence. Employee #1 confirmed in an interview on 02/28/2024 that this practice was not following facility policy.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2024 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 26, 2008.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 24 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, worse than expected.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (42 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 59% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 70 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Maricopa County, 68 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 10 rated 4 of 5, 35 rated 3 of 5, 18 rated 2 of 5, 4 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.