Davita Gilbert Dialysis Center
A dialysis facility in Gilbert, Arizona 85234
5222 E Baseline Rd Ste 104, Gilbert, Arizona 85234. (480) 832-6996.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 24 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2024: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 2, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Ic - Cdc Mmwr 2001
The inspectors’ words, 455 words
“IC-CDC MMWR 2001 CFR(s): 494.30(a) The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (1)(i) The recommendations (with the exception of screening for hepatitis C), found in “Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients,” developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, volume 50, number RR05, April 27, 2001, pages 18 to 28. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. This publication is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Central Building, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Copies may be obtained at the CMS Information Resource Center. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_regulations/ibr_locations.html. The recommendation found under section header “HBV-Infected Patients”, found on pages 27 and 28 of RR05 (“Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of Infections Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients”), concerning isolation rooms, must be complied with by February 9, 2009. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49430 Based on a review of policy and procedure, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: The staff appropriately cleansed the patient’s (Patient #10 and patient #11 ‘s) vascular access prior to cannulation with fistula needles. Failure to practice appropriate safe aseptic technique when cleansing and disinfecting a patient’s vascular access increases the risk for vascular access and bloodstream infection if bacteria are not sufficiently reduced at the cannulation sites prior to needle insertion. Findings include: 1. The policy titled “AV Fistula or Graft Cannulation with Nipro or Medisystems Safety Fistula Needles (SFN) and Administration of Heparin Loading Dose” requires: “...Check for patient sensitivity to preferred skin antiseptic/skin disinfectant listed in the table below (povidone-iodine, hypochlorite ExSept Plus). Use Isopropyl Alcohol 70% as the single-skin antiseptic ONLY when the patient has documented allergies to other skin antiseptics...Isopropyl Alcohol 70%...At least 4 prep pads per site...Effective Contact Time...60 seconds and dry time of 15 seconds ... Povidone Iodine at least 1 prep pad per site or 1 saturated sterile gauze pas per site ...for 30 seconds effective contact time and air-dry time of two minutes ....” Patient #10 Observation on April 1, 2024, revealed Employee #14 cleansing and disinfecting the patient #10 ‘s vascular access in preparation of cannulation. Employee #14 used saturated gauze with ExSept to cleanse the arterial cannulation site for a 57-second contact time. Employee #14 repeated the same process for the venous site with a contact time of 60 seconds. Employee #1 confirmed on April 2, 2024, that Employee #14 should have cleansed the cannulation site for two m”
-
Assess B/P & Fluid Management Needs
The inspectors’ words, 281 words
“PA-ASSESS B/P, FLUID MANAGEMENT NEEDS CFR(s): 494.80(a)(2) The patient’s comprehensive assessment must include, but is not limited to, the following: Blood pressure, and fluid management needs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49430 Based on medical record review, review of facility policy and procedure, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that vital signs were monitored every 30 minutes while receiving dialysis by a personnel member for 3(three) out of 5(five) patients reviewed, Patients #10, # 11, and # 12. Failure to ensure patients are monitored by a personnel member every 30 minutes while on dialysis can result in a patient having an adverse event. Findings include: Facility policy titled, “...Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring, and Nursing Assessment....” revised April 2021, revealed, “...The Nursing assessment will be performed and documented by a licensed nurse...The assessment includes...Verification that patient access is visible and face is not covered...Vital signs and treatment monitoring...For non-nocturnal treatments is completed at least every thirty (30) minutes....” “ ...Post Treatment ....” sheets revealed: Patient #8 March 18, 2024 11:10 to 11:40 March 27, 2024 09:31 to 10:02 Patient #10 March 20, 2024 06:43 to 07:14 08:55 to 09:28 10:42 to 11:37 March 25, 2024 11:53 to 12:28 March 27, 2024 08:25 to 09:04 Patient #11 March 22, 2024 10:25 to 10:56 11:26 to 10:57 March 25, 2024 10:25 to 10:56 12:56 to 13:27 March 29, 2024 12:00 to 12:31 Patient #12 March 18, 2024 10:45 to 11:19 March 20, 2024 10:48 to 11:19 11:42 to 12:13 March 22, 2024 10:43 to 11:14 11:14 to 11:45 March 25, 2024 10:55 to 11:27 March 27, 2024 11:10 to 11:41 13:07 to 13:38 March 29, 2024”
-
Frequency - Initial: 30 Days/13 Tx
The inspectors’ words, 169 words
“PA-FREQUENCY-INITIAL-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.80(b)(1) An initial comprehensive assessment must be conducted on all new patients (that is, all admissions to a dialysis facility), within the latter of 30 calendar days or 13 hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49430 Based on policy review, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined by the Department that the facility failed to require a History and Physical (H&P) be done annually for 3 of 5 current patients reviewed (Patients 10, # 11 and #12). Findings include: Policy titled “Dialysis Services and Patient History and Physical Examination” requires “The patient’s nephrologist...preforms a medical history and physical examination on the patient at least once every 12 months from the date of the patient’s admission...”. Patients’ #10, #11, #12 H&P’s were not completed within the 12 months required. During an interview conducted April 2, 2024, Employee #1, confirmed the intervals between the H&P’s in the patient’s chart is greater than one (1) year.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 8, 2004.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training.
- 24 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (46 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 76% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 70 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Maricopa County, 68 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 10 rated 4 of 5, 35 rated 3 of 5, 18 rated 2 of 5, 4 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.