Hearth Record

Fmc Odyssey Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Madison, Alabama 35758

40 Hughes Road, Madison, Alabama 35758. (256) 772-4435.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 12, 2025: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 12, 2025: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 811 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, facility procedure review, and a manufacturer’s instructions for use (IFU) review, the facility failed to maintain the arterial drip chamber fluid levels at approximately 90% full and the venous drip chamber fluid levels at approximately 70% full during four of four observations. Failure to follow the manufacturer’s IFU had the potential to result in equipment malfunction and/or failure and negatively impact the safety and wellbeing of the 44 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. Findings include: A facility procedure titled, “Initiation of Treatment Using an Arteriovenous Graft or Fistula and Optiflux Single Use Ebeam Dialyzer,” published 05/05/2025, indicated, “Final Machine Verification - Prior to starting the blood pump, verify the following: 1. All connections are secure. 2. Dialysate lines are attached properly to the dialyzer. 3. There is at least 300 ml [milliliters] of saline in the saline bag and the saline line is double clamped. 4. Any unused administration lines are clamped. 5. The arterial chamber is 85-95% full, and venous chamber is 65-75% full. 6. Arterial and venous monitoring transducers are securely connected, not wet with saline, and the transducer clamps are open. 7. Blood pump segment is threaded through the pump properly. 8. Venous drip chamber is correctly positioned in its housing and venous bloodline is threaded through the venous occluding clamp. 9. No kinks or bends are evident in any of the tubing. 10. No air is noted in the dialyzer or bloodlines.” The bloodline manufacturer’s IFU titled, “CombiSet True Flow Series Hemodialysis Blood Tubing Set with Attached Priming Set and Transducer Protectors,” with a copyright dated of 2024, indicated, “During Treatment a. Periodically check the extracorporeal circuit for any evidence of possible separation or leaks. b. Do not allow the access or bloodline connections to be covered with a blanket or clothing during the treatment. c. Maintain fluid level in arterial chamber at approximately 90% full and venous chamber at approximately 70% full. Levels may rise or drop during the treatment due to changes in pressure or flow rate. Readjust levels as needed. Air leaks will also cause the chamber levels to fluctuate.” Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 06/12/2025 at 7:55 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were less than (<) 90% full in Stations 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were greater than (>) 70% full in Stations 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13. Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 06/12/2025 at 8:35 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 90% full in Stations 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 15, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 70% full in Stations 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13. Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 06/12/2025 at 8:55 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 90% full in Stations 3, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 15, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 70% full in Stations 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 15. Observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 06/12/2025 at 10:25 AM with the Clinical Manager (CM) revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 90% full in Stations 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 70% full in Stations 4, 6, 9, 11, 14, and 15. During an interview on 06/12/2025 at 10:25 AM, the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU was reviewed with the CM, and the CM confirmed the arterial and venous drip chamber fluid levels were not maintained according to the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU. During an interview on 06/12/2025 at 10:53 AM, the Medical Director confirmed the staff should “absolutely” follow the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU for the arterial and venous drip chamber fluid levels. During an interview on 06/12/2025 at 11:17 AM, Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT) #1 stated the arterial drip chamber fluid levels should be “85%” full and the venous drip chamber fluid levels “not as full.” CCHT #1 confirmed the arterial and venous drip chamber fluid levels were not maintained according to the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU. During an interview on 06/12/2025 at 11:47 AM, the Registered Nurse (RN) stated the arterial drip chamber fluid levels should be “90%” full, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels should be “70%” full. The RN confirmed he was trained and expected to follow the bloodline manufacturer’s IFU.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 12, 2025Standard inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 5, 1999.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 15 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Madison County, 8 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.