Great Beginnings Early Learning Center
A child day center in Alexandria, Virginia 22314
618 N. Washington Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. (703) 520-9966.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 30 deficiencies in the last three years
- Sep 302026 the latest visit on record
- 93 children, its capacity in the state’s list
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
35 inspections on record, the latest on Sep 30, 2026.
30 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
30 deficiencies in 9 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
May 4, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance.
“Child #1 (age: 16 months) was observed eating cheerios off of the floor near the feeding table while Staff #1, Staff #2 & Staff #3 were in the classroom with nine children ages 11 month to 17 months.”
-
The required ratio for children ages Birth up to 16 months is one staff per four children.
“Staff #1 and Staff #2 were observed supervising nine children (youngest child 11 months old) for approximately two minutes.”
Apr 17, 2026: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
The required ratio for children ages 16 to 24 month is one staff per five children.
“Staff #1, Staff #2 and Staff #3 confirmed that on April 17, 2025, Staff #1 was left alone supervising six children (youngest Child #5, age 19 months) in classroom #2 for an undetermined amount of time.”
-
Documentation shall be maintained of shelter-in-place drills.
“One of two required shelter-in-place drills were documented for 2025.”
-
When a child is placed in an infant seat or high chair, the protective belt shall be fastened securely.
“In classroom #1, Child #1 (age 17 months), Child #2 (age 15 months), Child #3 (age 15 months) and Child #4 (age 16 months), were all eating in high chairs at the feeding table and none of their safety belts were fastened.”
Nov 12, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Hazardous substances such as cleaning materials shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Containers, wipes and spray bottles of disinfectant and detergent with warning labels, ?Keep out of reach of children,? were in an unlocked closet in a three-year-old classroom, within reach of children.”
-
The required first aid kits shall include at a minimum, triangular bandages.
“There was only one triangular bandage available at the center.”
Jul 14, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
In areas used by preschool age or younger children, electrical outlets shall have protective covers.
“Children in classroom #1 were observed near one uncovered electrical outlet that was within their reach.”
May 28, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
The Licensee shall post the Notice of Intent dated March 24, 2025, any Violation Notice(s) attached to the Notice of lntent, and the Special Order in a prominent place at each public entrance.
“The violation notice dated January 13, 2025, was not posted in a prominent place at each public entrance. The violation notice dated January 13, 2025, was posted behind the inspection dated May 12, 2025, and was not attached to the Notice of Intent or the Special Order.”
-
When an infant is able to easily turn over from the back (supine) to the belly (prone) position and he is placed in his crib, he shall still be put on his back (supine) but allowed to adopt whatever position he prefers.
“In classroom #2, child #3 (age: 13 months), was observed being laid to sleep on their belly by staff #2.”
-
In order to promote the child’s physical, intellectual, emotional, and social well-being and growth, staff shall interact with children to provide needed help, comfort and support.
“During nap time in classroom #1, staff #1 did not provide needed comfort and support to child #1(age: 2 years). Staff #1 was observed telling child #1 “I can’t pick you up” and walked away when child #1 was crying and reaching for staff #1. Video footage on May 28, 2025, shows staff #1 pushing child #1 away directing the child from them and to their cot.”
-
The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: forcing of rest;
The inspectors’ words, 95 words
“In classroom # 2, staff #2 was observed forcing child #4 (age: 11 months) to rest by pushing the child’s head down to their crib mattress, forcing the child’s legs out straight from under them and patting the child’s back with force. When staff #2 walked away from the crib, child #4 stood up smiling. Video footage on May 28, 2025, in classroom #1, shows staff #1 pulling child #1 (age: 2 years) down towards their cot by their right arm and rapidly pick the child up and forcefully repositioning the child on their cot.”
-
Repeat Violation
“Pillows and filled comforters shall not be used by children under two years of age. Child #2 (age: 22 months) was observed sleeping on a pillow in classroom #1.”
May 12, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Repeat Violation and Systemic Deficiency
“Areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition. Four cots used for nap time in classroom #1 were torn and fraying.”
-
Pillows and filled comforters shall not be used by children under two years of age.
“Child #1 (age: 8 months) was observed sleeping on a boppy pillow on a classroom mat in classroom #2. The tag on the boppy pillow states “Do not use for sleeping”. Staff #1 and Staff #2 stated that the child does not sleep in a crib and regularly sleeps on the boppy pillow.”
Mar 26, 2025: inspection6 deficiencies
-
The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Staff #5, employed for 3 days, did not have documentation of requesting a criminal history check from one state.”
-
Repeat Violation and Systemic Deficiency
“The center shall ensure that areas and equipment of the center, inside, are maintained in a safe and operable condition. In classroom #3, located on the 2nd story, an open window had a tear in the screen. Child #4 (age: 3 years) was observed lifting one leg up on to the windowsill of the open window. The opening of the window measured approximately 2ft 3in in length, approximately 2ft 3in in width and the open window was approximately 2ft 1.5in from the ground to windowsill.”
-
Repeat Violation
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance. On 03/26/2025, video footage of a classroom transition showed staff #2 shove child #1 (age: 5 years) from behind, staff #2 grabbed child #1 by the left lower arm and pulled child #1 towards the children lining up at the classroom door. Child #1 pulled away from staff #2, staff #2 grabbed child #1 from behind by grabbing both the childs upper arms and held the child by their upper arms until the child exited the classroom. Staff # 2 did not ensure the care, protection and guidance of child #1.”
-
Repeat Violation
The inspectors’ words, 142 words
“Behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts. On 03/26/2025, video footage of classroom #3s transition to classroom #4, showed child #1 (age: 5 years) playing, cleaning up toys and then sitting back down when the class was to line up. Staff #2 approaches the child; the child stands up and staff #2 shoved child #1 from behind. Staff #2 grabbed child #1 by the lower left arm and pulled child #1 towards the children lining up at the classroom door. Child #1 pulled away from staff #2 and then staff #2 grabbed child #1 from behind by grabbing both the child’s upper arms and held their upper arms until the child exited the classroom. This behavioral guidance is neither constructive in nature nor age and stage appropriate.”
-
Repeat Violation
“The following actions thereof are forbidden: roughly handling a child. On 03/26/2025, video footage of a classroom transition showed staff #2 shove child #1 (age: 5 years). Staff #2 roughly grabbed child #1 by the left lower arm and pulled child #1 towards the children lining up at the classroom door. Staff #2 roughly grabbed child #1 from behind by grabbing both the child’s upper arms and held the child by their upper arms until the child exited the classroom.”
-
Children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water or disposable wipes before eating meals and children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water after toileting. Staff shall wash their hands with soap and running water before and after a diaper change and before preparing or serving food or beverages.
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“In classroom #1, the children were playing with toys then sat down to eat lunch and did not wash hands. In classroom #1, staff #3 and staff #4 did not wash their hands before serving food. Video footage on 03/26/2025 of classroom #2 showed staff #1 not wash the hands of child #2 (age: 22 months) and child #3 (age: 23 months) hands after changing their diapers and returning the children to their group. Video footage on 03/26/2025 of classroom #2 showed staff #1 not wash their hands before diapering child #3.”
Jan 13, 2025: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance.
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“On 01/08/2025, video footage of circle time showed child #1 (age 2) fall on a friend, staff #3 roughly picked up child #1 under the arms and put the child down in another spot. On 01/09/2025, video footage of circle time showed staff #1 roughly grab child #1 under the arms and move child #1 to the other side of the carpet. Child #2 (age 2) crawled up to staff #1s lap, staff #1 pushed child #2 off of their lap. Staff #1 grabbed child #3 (age 2) by their shirt and pulled child #3 back to a sitting position. On 01/09/2025, video footage showed staff #2 grab child #4 (age 2) by the wrist and roughly pull the child up off of the ground to a standing position and pulled the child across the room to the bathroom. On 01/13/2025, video footage of nap time showed staff #4 pick child #4 up off of the ground by their left arm and left leg and put the child back on their cot. Child #2 picked their head up off of their cot and staff #4 put child #2s blanket back on them and pushed their head down to the cot.”
-
Each grouping of children shall have at least one staff regularly present who meets lead teacher qualifications.
“Staff #1, who did not meet lead teacher qualifications, was alone with a group of toddler aged children at the time of inspection.”
-
Behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and shall be intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts.
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“On 01/08/2025, video footage of circle time showed child #1 (age 2) fall on a friend, staff #3 roughly picked up child #1 under the arms and put the child down in another spot. On 01/09/2025, video footage of circle time showed staff #1 roughly grab child #1 under the arms and move child #1 to the other side of the carpet. Child #2 (age 2) crawled up to staff #1s lap, staff #1 pushed child #2 off of their lap. Staff #1 grabbed child #3 (age 2) by their shirt and pulled child #3 back to a sitting position. On 01/09/2025, video footage showed staff #2 grab child #4 (age 2) by the wrist and roughly pull the child up off of the ground to a standing position and pulled the child across the room to the bathroom. On 01/13/2025, video footage of nap time showed staff #4 pick child #4 up off of the ground by their left arm and left leg and put the child back on their cot. Child #2 picked their head up off of their cot and staff #4 put child #2s blanket back on them and pushed their head down to the cot.”
-
The following actions thereof are forbidden: roughly handling a child.
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“On 01/08/2025, video footage of circle time showed child #1 (age 2) fall on a friend, staff #3 roughly picked up child #1 under the arms and put the child down in another spot. On 01/09/2025, video footage of circle time showed staff #1 roughly grab child #1 under the arms and move child #1 to the other side of the carpet. Child #2 (age 2) crawled up to staff #1s lap, staff #1 pushed child #2 off of their lap. Staff #1 grabbed child #3 (age 2) by their shirt and pulled child #3 back to a sitting position. On 01/09/2025, video footage showed staff #2 grab child #4 (age 2) by the wrist and roughly pull the child up off of the ground to a standing position and pulled the child across the room to the bathroom. On 01/13/2025, video footage of nap time showed staff #4 pick child #4 up off of the ground by their left arm and left leg and put the child back on their cot. Child #2 picked their head up off of their cot and staff #4 put child #2s blanket back on them and pushed their head down to the cot.”
Nov 15, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Repeat Violation
“The center shall ensure that areas and equipment of the center, outside, are maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition. There was a Cozy Coupe on the playground with a missing door that exposed sharp plastic.”
-
Children three years of age or younger may not be offered foods that are considered to be potential choking hazards.
“Children ages sixteen months to three years were served whole meatballs.”
Apr 24, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-4
The inspectors’ words, 103 words
“Based on record review, the child day center failed to obtain a copy of a criminal history record information check from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years. Evidence: 1) Applicant #7 did not have a record of an out of state criminal history record information check from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years on file. 2) Applicant #8 did not have a record of an out of state criminal history record information check from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years on file.”
-
8VAC20-780-270-A
“Based on observation, the center did not ensure areas and equipment of the center, inside, were maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition. Evidence: 1) In the Lambs 2 Classroom, a plastic yellow toy bin on a lower toy shelf (accessible to children) had a cracked edge exposing sharp pieces of plastic.”
-
8VAC20-780-290-A-3
“Based on observation and interview, the center did not ensure that electrical outlets had protective covers. Evidence: 1) In the Penguins classroom, one outlet was observed without a protective cover. 2) Staff #6 acknowledged that the outlet was missing a protective cover.”
Oct 23, 2023: inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that all program leaders met the qualifications:
“Evidence: 1. Staff #1 stated that Staff #3, Staff #4 and Staff #5 were lead teachers. 2. Staff #3, Staff #4 and Staff #5 did not meet program leader qualifications.”
-
Based on record review and staff interview, the center failed to obtain annual approval from the health department for meeting requirements for water supply and sewage disposal system.
“Evidence: The center did not obtain approval from the health department for meeting requirements for water supply and sewage disposal system.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on observation, areas inside were not maintained in a safe and clean condition. Evidence: Mouse droppings were observed on the floor in the Penguins classroom.”
-
Based on observation and record review, the center failed to ensure that each grouping of children had at least one staff member who meets the qualifications of a program leader.
The inspectors’ words, 125 words
“Evidence: 1. Staff #2 was observed working alone in the Cubs classroom. Staff #2 stated that Staff #7 is the lead teacher in the Cubs classroom, but was absent. Staff #2 and Staff #7 are not lead qualified. 2. Staff# 4 was observed working alone in the Penguins classroom and is the Lead teacher of the room. Staff #4 is not lead qualified. 3. Staff #5 and Staff #12 were observed in the Lambs 2 classroom. Staff #5 is the Lead teacher of the room. Staff #5 and Staff #12 are not lead qualified. 4. Staff #11 and Staff#13 were observed working in the Lambs 1 classroom. Staff #11 is the Lead teacher of the room. Staff #11 and Staff #13 are not lead qualified.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that children’s and staff hands were washed with soap and running water after a diaper change.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #13 was observed changing Child #6?s diaper. 2. Child #6?s hands were not washed after the diaper change. 3. Staff #13 was observed using hand sanitizer after the diaper change.”
-
Based on observation, the center kept over-the-counter skin products beyond the expiration date of the product.
“Evidence: 1. A healing ointment located in the Ducks classroom expired September 2023. 2. A diaper rash cream located in the Ducks classroom expired May 2023.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to meet all requirements when diaper ointment was used.
“Evidence: A diaper ointment belonging to Child #1 was not labeled with the child’s name.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain all information for children’s records.
“Evidence: Child #4?s record did not contain a name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency.”
Aug 22, 2023: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 194 words
“Based on observation and staff interview, areas of the center were not maintained in a safe and clean condition. Evidence: 1. Mouse droppings were observed in the following areas of the center. a. In the Penguins classroom on a toy shelf by the emergency exit door, on a green chair by the cots, and on the floor by the trash can. b. In the Ducks classroom, on two toy shelves by the windows, on three sets of cubbies, and on the floor in front of a cubby set. c. In the Cubs classroom, at the bottom of the cubbies. 2. Staff #1 stated that they saw mouse droppings in the Ducks classroom and called pest control that morning. 3. Staff #2 stated that they saw mouse droppings in a classroom approximately 2 weeks ago. 4. Staff #3 stated that they have been aware of mouse problems for approximately six months and mouse traps have been placed in classrooms. 5. Staff #4 stated that a mouse was spotted in the first floor break area approximately two months ago. 6. On August 21, 2023, a staff member was observed sweeping up mouse droppings by Witness A.”
May 24, 2023: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record check for a staff member, from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #1?s (start date: 10/26/2021) record indicated that they resided out of state in the preceding five years. 2. Staff #1?s record does not contain results of an out-of-state criminal history record check.”
-
Based on record review, an employee of the center was employed before the center had the person’s completed sworn statement.
“Evidence: At the time of inspection, Staff #2 (start date 05/01/2023) did not have a sworn disclosure statement on file.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Evidence: 1. Child #1?s (age: 13 months) most recent documentation of immunizations was dated 08/05/2022. 2. Child #3?s (age: 16 months) most recent documentation of immunizations was dated 04/26/2022. 3. Child #4?s (age: 23 months) most recent documentation of immunizations was dated 08/15/2022.”
-
Based on observation, hazardous substances were not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: In the Cubs classroom, there was a bottle of adhesive remover (warning label states to keep out of reach of children) at the bottom of an unlocked storage cabinet, accessible to children.”
-
Based on observation, the staff-to-children ratios were not always maintained whenever children were in care.
“Evidence: The Cubs classroom (3-5 year olds) had a ratio of one staff member with eleven children from approximately 9:15 a.m. to approximately 10:30 a.m., leaving the classroom out of ratio.”
Oct 6, 2022: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center did not obtain a copy of the results of a criminal history record check for a staff member from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #2 (start date: 05/12/2021) has resided out of state in the preceding five years. An out-of-state criminal history record check was not obtained. 2. Staff #4 (start date: 08/26/2020) has resided out of state in the preceding five years. An out-of-state criminal history record check was not obtained.”
-
Based on record review, not all staff members obtained and submitted the results of a follow-up tuberculosis screening at least every two years from the date of the initial screening.
“Evidence: Staff #4?s most recent tuberculosis screening on file was dated 03/16/2020.”
-
Based on observation, areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, were not maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: 1. There were two spots of chipped purple paint located near the window in the ?Penguins? classroom. 2. There were five spots of chipped pink paint located on the half wall in the ?Lambs? classroom. 3. There was a broken piece of the vinyl gate with sharp edges, located towards the bottom of the gate door on the playground.”
-
Based on observation, there was not 30 inches of space between service sides of occupied cribs and other furniture.
“Evidence: 1. At the time of inspection, a crib occupied by Child #5 and a crib occupied by Child #6 were approximately 4 inches apart. 2. At the time of inspection, a crib occupied by Child #6 and a crib occupied by Child #7 were approximately 2 inches apart. 3. At the time of inspection, a crib occupied by Child #3 and a crib occupied by Child #8 were approximately 1 inch apart.”
-
Based on observation, bottles were used while the child was in their designated sleeping location.
“Evidence: 1. During the inspection, Child #2 was observed drinking a bottle while in their crib. 2. During the inspection, Child #8 was observed drinking a bottle while in their crib.”
-
Based on record review, the center did not obtain a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy.
“Evidence: 1. Child #1?s record indicates an allergy to dairy. There was no allergy care plan on file. 2. Child #4?s record indicates an allergy to eggs. There was no allergy care plan on file.”
All 35 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 19, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 23, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 4, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Apr 17, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Oct 15, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 17, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 14, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| May 28, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| May 28, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| May 12, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 12, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 26, 2025 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Jan 13, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Nov 15, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 15, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Apr 24, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 24, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Oct 23, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 23, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 23, 2023 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Aug 22, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| May 24, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 24, 2023 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Nov 29, 2022 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 6, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 6, 2022 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Oct 6, 2022 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| May 6, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 6, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 3, 2022 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 3, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Provisional license, expires Nov 28, 2026.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 6 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 93 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 9 complaint inspections on record.
- 1 complaint allegation published with Virginia’s findings, 1 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2023 | Complaint | Allegation: Housekeeping/Sanitation. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 171 child care providers in the City of Alexandria, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 30.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Hopkins House - Helen Day Preschool Academy | 61 |
| Children’s Int’l School -Alexandria | 11 |
| Washington Street United Methodist Church | 0 |
| The Campagna Center - Lyles Crouch | 4 |
| Potomac Crescent Waldorf School | 11 |
| Innovation Station Child Development Center | 47 |
| American Day School #1 | 14 |
| Tiny Tots Playroom | 2 |
| American Day School 2 | 9 |
| Great Beginnings Early Learning Center This child care provider | 30 |
| Blue Bird of Alexandria | 1 |
| The Del Ray Montessori School | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.