Mrs. Joan Green
A family day home in Emporia, Virginia 23847
710 Halifax Street, Emporia, Virginia 23847. (434) 348-0799.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 31 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jun 232026 the latest visit on record
- 12 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
13 inspections on record, the latest on Jun 23, 2026.
31 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
31 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jun 23, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection6 deficiencies
-
A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the last screening.
“An updated TB screening for Caregiver #1 and Caregiver #2 were not completed and was overdue by more than five months.”
-
The provider shall ensure that a caregiver does not exceed 16 points.
“Upon entering the home, the inspector found one assistant caregiver supervising 10 children (ages 16 months - 4 years old). The point total was 22. The assistant caregiver was alone for an undetermined amount of time prior to the inspection, and the provider returned to the home 5 minutes after assistant called provider.”
-
Annually the provider shall review with the parent the emergency contact information required in 8VAC20-800-60 B 2 to ensure the information is correct, and obtain the parents’ signed acknowledgment of the review.
“Child #1, Child #2, and Child #3 did not have an annual review within the last 12 months.”
-
The emergency evacuation procedures shall be practiced monthly with all caregivers and children in care during all shifts that children are in care.
“Fire drills were not completed for February 2026.”
-
The family day home shall obtain documentation of additional immunizations for a child who is not exempt from the immunization once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Child #4 received documentation of additional immunizations more than 8 months after the original immunizations.”
-
Temperatures shall be maintained at or below 40?F in refrigerator compartments and at or below 0?F in the freezer compartments.
“Inspection of the freezer found the temperature to be 15?F. Food remained frozen in freezer.”
Sep 23, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Poisonous materials shall be stored in an area inaccessible to children.
“Scrubbing Bubbles and additional cleaning materials were left unlocked and accessible to children in the bathroom.”
-
The provider shall review the emergency plan at least annually and update the plan as needed. The provider shall document in writing each review and update to the emergency plan.
“The provider had not updated the emergency preparedness plan since 8/22/2024.”
Jun 5, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Repeat Violation: Annually, the provider shall review with the parent the emergency contact information required in each child’s record to ensure the information is correct and shall obtain the parents signed acknowledgment of the review.
“Records for children #2 and #4 did not have a parent’s signature for an annual review of the emergency contact information. Child #2 had been in care for over a year. Child #4 had been in care for almost two years without any annual review.”
-
Repeat Violation: Documentation of additional immunizations is required once every six months for children under the age of two years. ’
“Child #1, 23 months old, last documented immunization was over 12 months ago.”
Aug 20, 2024: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on staff record review, staff did not have up to date Central Registry checks in employee files.
“Evidence: 1. Staff #1, with a hire date of 2002, did not have documentation of an updated Central Registry check. The last documented background check was dated in 2016. 2. Staff #3, with a hire date of 09/19/2016, did not have documentation of an updated Central Registry check. The last documented background check was dated in 2016. 3. Director acknowledged there were no updated checks.”
-
Based on child record review, the provider failed to obtain documentation of a physical examination for child in care.
“Evidence: 1. Child #3, start date 6/27/2024, did not have a copy of a physical in their file. 2. Provider stated they had asked parent for information but was only given immunization records.”
-
Based on staff record review, the provider did not obtain documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment.
“Evidence: Staff #2 with a hire date of 01/02/2023 did not have documentation of any reference checks.”
-
Based on a home tour, the provider failed to ensure that areas of the home shall be maintained in a safe condition.
“Evidence: 1. Approximately 7 dangling charging cords were observed in the dining room area. 2. These cords were accessible to the children in care who were observed in the dining room area during the inspection.”
-
Based on child record review, no annual update was completed for children in care.
“Evidence: 1. Child #1 had an annual update dated 7/14/2023. 2. Child #4, with a start date of 9/6/2022, did not have a dated annual update. 3. Child #5, with a start date of 8/1/2023 did not have a dated annual update. 4. Child #6, with a start date of 8/1/2023 did not have a dated annual update. 5. Child #7, with a start date of 12/27/2022, did not have a dated annual update.”
-
Based on record review, an annual review of the emergency preparedness plan was not conducted.
“Evidence: The emergency preparedness plan that was posted was not updated annually. The last documented date of review was dated 2017.”
-
Based on record review, the provider failed to obtain documentation of additional immunizations for children in care.
“Evidence: 1. Child #5 (age 13 months) did not have updated immunization records every six months. Immunization form was dated 10/05/2023. 2. Child #6 (age 13 months) did not have updated immunization records every six months. Immunization form was dated 10/05/2023.”
Apr 1, 2024: inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to obtain, for children in care, documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: 1. Child 4, enrollment date 01/03/2023, lacks documentation of a physical exam. 2. Child 7, enrollment date 01/03/2023, lacks documentation of a physical exam. 2. The provider verified that a physical exam was not on file for child 4 and child 7.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that areas of the home shall be maintained in a safe condition.
“Evidence: 1. Approximately 8 dangling cords were observed in the area beside the dining room table. a. These cords were accessible to the children in care who were observed in the dining room area during the inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the provider failed to ensure that parents shall be provided with the written parent agreement.
“Evidence: 1. The enrollment record for child 1 and child 2 lacked a complete parent agreement. 2. The provider confirmed that a written parent agreement was not on file for child 1 and child 2.”
-
Based on record review, the provider failed to ensure that annually children’s records will be reviewed with the parent to ensure that emergency contact information is correct and obtain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the review.
“Evidence: 1. The following children’s records lacked documentation of annual review by the parent: a. The enrollment record for child 7 was last reviewed by the parent on 01/03/2023; b. The enrollment record for child 4 was last reviewed by the parent on 01/03/2023; c. The enrollment record for child 5 was last reviewed by the parent on 12/2019; d. The enrollment record for child 6 was last reviewed by the parent on 01/04/2021. 2. The provider confirmed that the above records had not been reviewed annually by each parent.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that the telephone number for the responsible person for emergency backup care shall be posted in a visible area close to the telephone.
“Evidence: 1. The telephone number for the provider’s emergency backup caregiver was not posted. a. The provider confirmed that this information was not posted.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to ensure that shelter-in-place procedures shall be practiced a minimum of twice per year.
“Evidence: 1. The written emergency log for the FDH indicated that only one shelter-in-place practice drill had been conducted. 2. The provider confirmed that a second shelter drill had not been conducted.”
-
Based on record review, the provider failed to obtain documentation of additional immunizations for children in care.
The inspectors’ words, 124 words
“Evidence: 1. Child 5, age 8 years, lacked documentation of having received updated immunizations once between the child’s fourth and sixth birthday. a. The most recent immunizations on file were administered on 09/13/2016. 2. Child 6, age 5 years, lacked documentation of having received updated immunizations once between the child’s fourth and sixth birthday. a. The most recent immunizations on file were administered on 10/12/2020. 3. Child 3, age 20 months, lacked documentation of having received updated immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years. a. The most recent immunizations on file were administered on 01/23/2023. 4. The provider confirmed that updated immunization records had not been obtained for these children who were all in care during the inspection.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that children shall not be allowed to eat or drink while lying down.
“Evidence: 1. At approximately 12:20 pm child 1 and child 2 were put down for nap with a bottle of formula. Both children were observed drinking from their bottles while lying down. 2. Child 3 was placed in his crib with a sippy cup which he was drinking from while lying down in his crib.”
Nov 16, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review and interview, the vendor failed to ensure that within the first 90 days of employment or service all caregivers shall complete Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff sponsored by the Department of Education.
“Evidence: 1. Caregiver 1, hire date 01/02/2023 lacks documentation of completion of Virginia Preservice Training. a. The provider confirmed that caregiver 1 had not completed this training.”
Nov 16, 2023: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to obtain for all applicants, caregivers and household members a fingerprint background check every five years.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent fingerprint background check for caregiver 2 was conducted on 04/27/2018; 2. The most recent fingerprint background check for caregiver 3 was conducted on 05/07/2018; 3. The most recent fingerprint background check for caregiver 4 was conducted on 05/04/2018; 4. The most recent fingerprint background check for household member 1 was conducted on 05/08/2018 5. The provider verified that these background checks had not been updated.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to obtain a fingerprint background check for all caregivers prior to employment.
“Evidence: 1. Caregiver 1, hire date 01/02/2023, lacked the results of a fingerprint background check. 2. The provider confirmed that a fingerprint background check had not been obtained for caregiver 1.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that areas of the family day home, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a safe condition. Unsafe conditions shall include, but not be limited to, the presence of poisonous plants; tripping hazards; unstable heavy equipment, furniture, or other items that a child could pull down on himself; splintered, cracked, or otherwise deteriorating wood; chipped or peeling paint; visible cracks, bending or warping, rusting, or breakage of any equipment; head entrapment hazards; and protruding nails, bolts, or other components that could entangle or could snag skin.
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Evidence: 1. The following safety hazards were observed during a review of the outdoor play area: a. The wood support and one wooden spindle were loose on the railing of the entrance/exit deck to the outdoor play area. This poses a potential fall/head entrapment hazard; b. An extension cord, electrical wire with attached socket, small metal chain, and a rusty metal tent pole were observed placed in a pile on a table located within the outdoor play area. These items are within easy reach of children. 2. Two metal coat hooks were attached to the wall outside of the preschool play room approximately 21 inches from the floor. These hooks are at face level of preschool children and could cause potential injury to the face/eye if a child were to fall or be pushed toward these protruding hooks.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that Infant carrier seats shall be used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The inspectors’ words, 100 words
“Evidence: 1. When the inspector arrived at approximately 10:05 am child 1, age 5 months, was observed sitting in an infant carrier seat that had been hooked over a chair in the living room of the home. a. The plastic carrier handle had been placed over the back of a chair so that the chair was sitting on top of the couch cushion. 2. The manufacturer label, placed on this chair, states the product should never be used on any elevated or soft surface due to potential for fall or tipping over. The label additionally states, “Use only on floor.””
-
Based on interview, the provider failed to ensure that the diapering surface shall be cleaned after each use.
“Evidence: 1. The provider stated that the diapering surface was sanitized after each diaper change however, the surface was not cleaned prior to sanitizing as required.”
Oct 28, 2022: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to obtain documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: 1. Child 1, enrollment date 09/06/2022, lacked documentation of a physical exam. 2. The provider confirmed that a physical exam was not on file for child 1 who was in care during the inspection.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that stationary outdoor equipment be firmly anchored with ground supports.
“Evidence: The little tikes climber / play structure was not firmly anchored into the ground resulting in movement of the structure when pushed on.”
-
Based on record review, the provider failed to obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Evidence: 1. Child 2, age 14 months, lacks documentation of current immunizations. a. The most recent immunizations on file were administered on 10/08/2021. 2. The provider confirmed that an updated immunization record had not been obtained for child 2.”
Aug 11, 2022: inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that areas of the family day home, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a safe condition. Unsafe conditions shall include, but not be limited to, the presence of poisonous plants; tripping hazards; unstable heavy equipment, furniture, or other items that a child could pull down on himself; splintered, cracked, or otherwise deteriorating wood; chipped or peeling paint; visible cracks, bending or warping, rusting, or breakage of any equipment; head entrapment hazards; and protruding nails, bolts, or other components that could entangle or could snag skin.
The inspectors’ words, 187 words
“Evidence: 1. The following safety hazards were observed in the rear area of the backyard the provider identified as in use for outdoor play. a. Accessible brick fire pit containing loose bricks and metal fire poker; b. Accessible dangling extension cords; c. Accessible metal fan placed on the floor and a table located on covered patio; d. Loose plastic lattice attached to wood boards placed beside porta potty; e. Accessible dangling outdoor string lights; f. Standing water and debris inside of a plastic storage container; g. Half of the round platform of the circular plastic go around is cracked and broken; h. Deteriorated areas of duck tape was observed on the sides of the outdoor climbing structure; I. The safety strap was broken on one of the molded toddler swings; j. Dirt was observed inside the molded toddler swing seat and along the sides of two of the climber/slide cubes. 2. One occupied crib was placed in an area within reach of items, including but not limited to, picture frames and awards that were placed on the wall and shelves of the area utilized for infant napping.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to provide each child with adequate space to allow free movement and active play indoors.
“Evidence: 1. The room in use for activities, during the inspection, lacked adequate space for the 8 children and 1 adult observed in this room from 10:55 am until approximately 12:15 pm. a. The furnishing and equipment left little floor space which resulted in the children staying in high chairs and desk chairs when this room was in use for activities.”
-
Based on record review, the provider failed to keep a written record of children in attendance each day.
“Evidence: 1. The parent sign-in sheet, which the provider uses for the attendance record, lacked documentation of three children in care. a. Child 2, 5 and 6 had not been signed in nor had the provider added them to the sign in sheet for the family day home.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that cribs when being used by infants shall have a tight-fitting bottom cover.
“Evidence: 1. One crib sheet was loose fitting. a. The provider confirmed that an infant had napped in this crib earlier in the morning.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that infants and toddlers shall be provided with opportunities to: Reach, gasp, pull up, creep, crawl and walk to develop motor skills.
“Evidence: 1. During the inspection from 10:55 am - 1:45 pm the three infants in care and the two toddlers in care were not provided opportunities to crawl, creep, pull up or walk. All five children were placed in high chairs and infant seats. a. The infants were held by caregivers at various times nevertheless, they did not have any opportunity for motor activities.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that infants and toddlers shall spend no more than 30 minutes of consecutive time during waking hours, with the exception of mealtimes, confined in a crib, play pen, high chair or other confining piece of equipment. The intervening time period between confinements shall be at least one hour.
“Evidence: 1. Child 1, age 12 months, child 2, age 12 months, child 3, age 23 months, child 4, age 2 years and child 5, age 23 months and child 7, age 5 months, were observed in high chairs and infant seats from 10:55 am, when the inspector arrived, until approximately 1:15 pm when they placed on rest mats for nap. a. The only time during the inspection these children were taken out of the high chairs / infant seats was for hand washing and toileting/diapering prior to lunch.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that bottles shall be labeled with the child’s full name and the date, if more than one infant is in care.
“Evidence: 1. Three bottles of formula were not dated. 2. One bottle of formula lacked a name label. a. The provider stated there were 2 infants in care that were bottle fed with formula.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to post the most recently issued license. Any provisional license shall be posted at each public entrance of the facility and a notice shall be prominently displayed next to the license that states that a description of specific violations of licensing standards.
“Evidence: 1. The provisional licensed, issued 04/29/2022, was not posted in the family day home.”
Mar 17, 2022: inspection10 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to ensure that any person living in the family day home who is required to have a search of central registry shall obtain an updated central registry check before three years since the dates of the most recent central registry finding.
“1. The most recent central registry search for household member 1 was conducted on 12/08/2016. a. The provider confirmed that an updated central registry check had not been obtained for household member 1.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to obtain documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: 1. Child 2, child 3 and child 4,enrollment date 01/19/2022, lacked documentation of a physical exam 2. The provider confirmed that a documented physical exam was not on file for these children.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that furnishings of the family day home, shall be maintained in a safe, and operable condition.
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Evidence: 1. One crib , (color white) , was missing an attachment bolt between the end and side panel/railing attachment. The result was a loose unsecured end panel. 2. A second crib, (color brown), had a thick piece of cardboard attached to one side of the railing using duck tape. This is a safety hazard as cribs are not to be modified in any way as changes can comprise the integrity of the crib. Additionally, the duck tape and cardboard are unsafe to children if they were to chew or mouth on them.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that cribs when being used by infants shall have a tight-fitting bottom cover.
“Evidence: The crib sheet placed on the brown crib was loose and had two holes in the sheet.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the provider failed to ensure that children under two years of age shall not use pillows.
“1. A pillow was observed inside of a mesh sided portable play pen that identified for use by child 3 during awake play time. a. Child 3 is 6 months of age.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure high chairs shall be used according to the manufacturer’s instructions and when occupied by a child, a safety strap shall be used and securely fastened.
“Evidence: 1. Four children, ranging in age from 18 months - 2 years , were observed sitting in high chairs without the safety strap engaged. 2. The manufacture label affixed to the high chairs states: :Warning: Prevent serious injury or death from falls or sliding out. Always secure child with the restraining system ...the tray is not designed to hold the child in the chair.””
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that caregivers shall wash their hands with liquid soap and warm running water after diapering.
“Evidence: 1. Caregiver 1 failed to wash her hands with soap and water after changing the diaper of child 3 at 11:41 am. a. After completion of the diaper change caregiver 1 was observed placing child 1 in an infant swing and then walking to the back of the home to retrieve emergency supplies for the provider.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that children’s hands are washed with liquid soap and warm running water after diapering.
“Evidence: 1. Caregiver 1 failed to wash child 3’s hands with soap and warm running water after completion of a diaper change at 11:41am. a. After completion of the diaper change, caregiver 1 immediately placed child 3 into an infant swing.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that the diapering surface shall be cleaned and sanitized after each use.
“Evidence: The provider failed to clean and sanitize the diapering surface after changing a diaper at 11:41am.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent immunizations on file for child 1, age 21 months, were conducted on 07/21/2020. a. Child 1 was in care during the inspection and has an enrollment date of 11/23/2020. 2. The most recent immunizations on file for child 4 , age 18 months, were conducted on 09/02/2020. a. Child 4 was in care during the inspection and has an enrollment date of 01/19/2022.”
All 13 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Sep 23, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 23, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 20, 2024 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Apr 1, 2024 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Nov 16, 2023 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Nov 16, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 28, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Aug 11, 2022 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Mar 17, 2022 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| Mar 17, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: One Year license, expires Oct 13, 2026.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: Birth - 12 years 11 months.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 4 child care providers in the City of Emporia, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 31.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Ms. Diana Mayfield | 11 |
| The Improvement Association Child Development Center | 1 |
| Mrs. Joan Green This child care provider | 31 |
| Family YMCA of Emporia-Greensville | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.