Amazing Kidz Childcare Center LLC
A licensed child care center in Arlington, Texas 76010
1703 Susan Dr, Arlington, Texas 76010. (817) 633-2222.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Texas’s own record is on its child care search.
The short answer
Record last released by Texas HHSC on Nov 5, 2026.
- 46 deficiencies cited in the last three years Middle in Tarrant County: 3
- 14 rated High by Texas, its most serious level (needs attention)
- 40 inspections on record
- 3-Star Texas Rising Star rating
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean5
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Texas’s risk levels
- Texas gives each child care deficiency a risk level, by how likely it is to harm a child: Low, Medium Low, Medium, Medium High or High. High is its most serious. Source: Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Child Care Regulation.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
46 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 920 child care providers in Tarrant County had 3.
40 inspections on record. The latest, on Oct 8, 2026: no violation found.
Rated High by Texas: Electronic Child Safety Alarm - used at all times when transporting a child in care, at the inspection on Apr 13, 2026
Rated High by Texas: Child-Care Center Must be Equipped with a Working Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection System, at the inspection on Dec 17, 2025
Rated High by Texas: Required Equipment in Vehicles - Emergency Medical Information, at the inspection on Dec 17, 2025
11 more rated High; all are listed below.
Texas HHSC, deficiencies (non-compliance data) and inspections and investigations. Released Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily.
When those deficiencies happened
46 deficiencies in 13 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: High. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in Texas’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the risk level Texas gave it, from Low to High.
Texas HHSC, deficiencies (non-compliance data). Released Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily.
Apr 27, 2026: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Documented Annual Training Area - 24 Hours Required
“3 caregivers did not have 24 training hours at the time of inspection.”
-
Director Annual Training 30 Hours Required
“The 2 directors did not have 30 hours of training for thier training year to anniversary date at the time of inspection.”
Apr 13, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
Electronic Child Safety Alarm - used at all times when transporting a child in care
“During the follow-up visit, the vehicle did not have a safety alarm on the vehicle.”
Mar 17, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
Maintenance Procedures for Active Play - Hazards Removed or Repaired
“During the follow-up visit, the playground fence was leaning and had a black covering that was falling behind the covering are broken panels, and the fence is no longer connected to the ground. As you walk down the playground, the area slopes in and it is easy to slide down toward the leaning fence.”
Dec 17, 2025: inspection9 deficiencies
-
Child-Care Center Must be Equipped with a Working Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection System
“During the monitoring visit, the operation did not have a carbon monoxide detector available for review.”
-
Required Equipment in Vehicles - Emergency Medical Information
“During the monitoring visit, the emergency authorization section was not complete for one child in the transportation binder.”
-
Driver Has Current Driver’s License
“During the monitoring visit, I could not view current driving licenses for two drivers at the operation. Out of the two, one driving license was not available for review.”
-
Training Requirements for Employees, Caregivers, and Directors - Pediatric First Aid with Rescue Breathing
“During the visit 7 out of 10 caregivers did not have current First Aid training certificates available for review.”
-
Training Requirements for Employees, Caregivers, and Directors - Pediatric CPR
“During the visit 7 out of 10 caregivers did not have current CPR training certificates available for review.”
-
Transportation Safety Training -Director and Employee Complete 2 Hours Annually
“During the monitoring visit, I could not view current transportation training certificates for four drivers.”
-
Child/Caregiver Ratio - 18 Months Difference in Age
“During the monitoring visit, there were fifteen children in the class. There was a mixed group of children ages 13 months to five years of age. The specific age was two years old. The youngest in the class was 13 months old with two caregivers present. During the visit, once another caregiver arrived, the children were separated into three classrooms.”
-
Immunization Records, Exceptions, and Exemptions Current
“During the visit, two out of ten children did not have up-to-date immunization records available for review.”
-
Required Personnel Records - Required Affidavit (Form 2985)
“During the visit, I could not view three caregivers’ 2985 affidavit forms. Two of the forms were in the folder but not notarized, and one of the forms was not available for review.”
Dec 4, 2025: assessment1 deficiency
-
Provide Access to Children’s Records - Licensing
“During the visit, the victim’s records were not available for the DFPS investigator or inspector.”
Dec 3, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
Maintenance of Building, Grounds and Equipment
“During the follow-up visit, the fence on the playground at an exit gate has a wide opening on the playground.”
Dec 1, 2025: report to the state8 deficiencies
-
Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. The caregiver demonstrated a lack of good judgment and competency when failing to complete multiple caregiver responsibilities regarding transportation including not verifying the child’s attendance with school personnel or parents before leaving the school, not utilizing the operation’ face to name sheet to verify who got on and off the vehicle, and not utilizing the child safety alarm on the vehicle.”
-
Responsibilities of Caregivers - Know children responsible for
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. The caregiver was unaware of the children who she was responsible for during transportation to the center from the school.”
-
Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. The caregiver was unaware that the victim was on the transportation vehicle and unaware of the victim’s activity in the van. Moreover, once the caregiver arrived at the operation and left the van with the victim still in, the caregiver did not have any physical proximity or auditory or visual awareness of the victim for the victim’s safety and well-being after leaving the van. As a result, the victim was left in the van for 3 hours with soiled clothes.”
-
Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. It was determined that the caregiver did not account for who got on or off the van. The caregiver did not know who was in the van while she was transporting. As a result, a child was left on the van for 3 hours.”
-
AP Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - No Child Unattended
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. It was determined that a 5-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended at the operation for three hours.”
-
Electronic Child Safety Alarm - used at all times when transporting a child in care
“During the follow-up visit, the operation vehicles were not present. All vehicles were in the car shop for maintenance.”
-
Transportation Safety Training -Director and Employee Complete 2 Hours Annually
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. The caregiver did not received 2 hours of transportation training before she started transporting children.”
-
Documentation of Training Requirements - Trainer’s Qualifications
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. The training certificate did not have trainer’s qualification.”
Oct 28, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
Infant May Not Sleep in a Restrictive Device
“During the follow-up visit, there was a 3-month-old infant sleeping in the restrictive device. The infant classroom had seven infants with two caregivers. The caregiver removed the 3-month-old infant from the restrictive device upon request from the inspector and placed it in the crib. The specific age is 9 months old in the classroom.”
Oct 16, 2025: report to the state1 deficiency
-
Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
“During the investigation visit, the operation was out of ratio. There was one caregiver supervising nineteen children on the playground. The ages were 21 months to 4 years of age. The specific age is 3 years of age. The operation was over ratio by four children with one caregiver. The children were outside from 3:15 to 4:13 pm until another caregiver arrived and the class was split up.”
Sep 30, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
AP Must Place Infants in Face up Sleeping Position or Must Have Completed and Signed Sleep Exception Form for the Infant
“During the visit, there was a two-month-old sleeping on its stomach in a crib without the sleep exception form signed by a health care professional. Caregiver removed infant from crib.”
Sep 18, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
AP Background check results - Must receive notification prior to allowing subject to be present at your operation
“During the follow-up visit, there was an individual in the office that did not have a background check. The caregiver in the infant classroom did not have a background check and had to stay because the operation would be out of ratio if they had left the operation.”
-
Infant Care Area Furnishings and Equipment -Use of Safety Straps
“During the follow-up visit, there was an 8-month-old and an 11-month-old infant not strapped in a table while eating their morning breakfast at the table. The caregiver buckled the children upon request from the inspector.”
Aug 28, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Maintenance of Building, Grounds and Equipment
“During the monitoring visit, the grass was high on the outdoor playground.”
-
Annual Fire Inspection - Conducted by Fire Marshal
“During the monitoring visit, the operation did not have a current fire inspection available for review.”
Jul 8, 2025: report to the state1 deficiency
-
Personnel Record Storage
“Based on information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a violation was found. The operation did not have records available for two caregivers during the DFPS face-to-face visit. One caregiver’s last day of employment was two months before the day of the visit per the director, but no documents were provided, and the second caregiver was present, and no file was available during the DFPS face-to-face visit. The DFPS was not able to review any records during the visit and also requested records by email, and no records were sent.”
Feb 25, 2025: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Transportation Safety Training -Director and Employee Complete 2 Hours Annually
“During the monitor visit, the director and two bus drivers did not have the annual transportation training hours available for review during the monitoring visit.”
-
Food Allergy Emergency Plan Signed by Parents and Health Care Professional
“During the monitor visit, five children did not have the food allergy emergency plan available for review during the monitoring visit.”
-
Electronic or Battery-Operated Carbon Monoxide Detector-Document Test Date, Battery Installation Date, and Staff Name Testing and Installation
“During the monitor visit, the operation did not have documentation for carbon monoxide detection available for review.”
-
Written Operational Policies - Duration
“During the monitor visit, the operation did not have the physical duration time in the parent handbook.”
-
Documentation of Drills
“The operation did not have any documentation of fire drills available for review during the monitoring visit.”
-
Children’s Records - Immunizations
“During the monitor visit, the shot records were not available for four students during the monitoring visit.”
Sep 5, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
Activities for Infants - Not in Restrictive Device for more than 15 Minutes
“Upon arrival, there was a 15-month-old child in the high chair at 8:30 am. The child was sitting in a high chair and did not have any food, bottle, toys or cup on the tray. The child was removed from the high chair at 8:50 am. She was initially in the toddler classroom, then she was moved to the infant classroom, where another caregiver was placed in the classroom.”
Aug 26, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“The infant room had seven children with one caregiver upon arrival. The specific age is 11 months. A second caregiver entered the class to make compliant but had to leave to assist with the large group class in the eating area. The eating area had twenty-four children with one caregiver. The specific age is 2 years old. The director arrived and the large class in the eating area was split up into two groups. The toddler room had eleven children, and the specific age is two years old. The preschool class stayed in the eating area with twelve children, and the specific age is 3-4 years old. The infant room had two teachers, and the specific age is 11 months.”
-
Installation and Maintenance of Loose-fill Surfacing - Proper Depth Maintained
“The slide does not have six inches of mulch under the landing slide area on the playground equipment.”
-
Written Activity Plan - No Long Waiting Periods
“During the monitor visit, the children were running around. The children were running in and out of the other classrooms. The caregiver attempted to have the children sit on the carpet. There were some children sitting at the table with no activities. The children on the carpet did not have any activities. Eventually, after a suggestion from the inspector, the caregiver provided blocks for the children at the table and was able to have children sit at three tables and play with blocks.”
Aug 15, 2024: report to the state1 deficiency
-
Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
“There were sixteen children in the eating area of the operation, with one caregiver. The specific age is two years old. The infant room had seven children with one caregiver. The specific age is fourteen months. The children in the eating area were split up into two groups, with two caregivers and another caregiver arrived in the infant room.”
Jun 13, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Employee Handwashing Before Eating or Handling Food
“I observed the caregivers and the assistant director serve food to children without washing their hands during their visit today. Children were severed in the open eating area in the in the toddler, one, and infant classrooms.”
-
Children Handwashing Before Eating
“I observed the children in the open eating area not washing their hands before eating, and when the children were dropped off in the morning, they did not wash their hands. The children in the toddler, infant, and one-year-old classrooms did not wash their hands before breakfast.”
May 29, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
Floors, ceilings and Walls in Good Repair and Clean
“The wall in the open space for children has a hole, and the restroom in classroom 6 has a hole in the wall.”
Apr 9, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
Children’s Records - Immunizations
“Three out of ten children did not have an up-to-date shot record.”
18 deficiencies older than three years
Nov 17, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Mark Cleaning Supplies, Toxic Materials; Keep Separate from Food and Inaccessible to Children
“There was a bottle of bleach and a bottle of clear water not labeled in the infant room. (Note: The bottles were labeled during the inspection.)”
Aug 2, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Child/Caregiver Ratio - 18 Months Difference in Age
“Infants ages 6 months and 8 months were combined in the common room with children that were 18 months older than the children. The oldest child in the group was 11 years old. (Note: The two infants were moved to the infant classroom during the inspection.)”
Jun 23, 2022: report to the state7 deficiencies
-
AP Background check results - Must receive notification prior to allowing subject to be present at your operation
“A 17 year old caregiver was present at the operation and had direct access to children prior to the operation receiving a background check result of eligible, eligible with conditions, or provisionally eligible. (Note: The caregiver left during the inspection).”
-
Activities for Infants - Not in Restrictive Device for more than 15 Minutes
“It was determined that infants and toddlers are being seated in restrictive devices (highchairs) for more than 15 minutes during opening hours.”
-
Infant May Not Sleep in a Restrictive Device
“It was determined that infants are being allowed to sleep in restrictive devices (swings).”
-
Prohibited Punishments - Using Inappropriate Long Period of Silence or Inactivity Including Requiring Child to Remain in a Restrictive Device
“A 19 month old child was placed in a highchair and put in a separate room due to the child’s behavior. The child remained in the highchair for an extended period of time.”
-
Pest Extermination
“The operation did not use a licensed exterminator to treat the child-care center for insects. An over-the-counter pesticide was used and applied by one of the caregivers. The caregiver is not certified as a noncommercial applicator.”
-
Children Not Allowed in Areas with Pesticide Residue
“Children were present in the center when pesticides were sprayed to treat the building for insects placing children at risk.”
-
Caregiver Qualification Age Exemption with HS Diploma/GED- Not in Charge of Group
“A 17 year old was observed in charge of a group of children and was supervised by a qualified caregiver.”
May 5, 2022: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Basic Requirements for Infants - Free from Choking Objects That May Cause Choking in Infants or Toddlers
“An infant was sleeping in a crib with a lanyard attached to her pacifier.”
-
Infant May Not Sleep in a Restrictive Device
“An infant that was 4 months old was asleep in the swing during the inspection. Form 2970 was given to the operation at the inspection.”
-
Child/Caregiver Ratio - 18 Months Difference in Age
“An infant that was one month old was combined with infants that were 21 months old.”
-
Safety Requirements for Cribs - Snug Fitting Sheets
“The infants sheets were not snug during the inspection. The caregivers did place sheet clips to tighten the sheets during the inspection.”
-
Safety Requirements for Active Play Equipment - Used According to Manufacturer’s Instructions
“The operation purchased a play structure that is missing a leg. A PCV pipe was placed to replace the missing leg. The operation is not using the structure at this time and understand it can not use it under a manufacture replacement is installed. Manufacture instructions were not available at the time of inspection.”
-
Children’s Records - Health Statement
“Out of ten children files reviewed, one child did not have a health statement available at the time of the inspection.”
-
Required Records Maintained and Made Available - Playground Maintenance Records
“The last dated playground maintenance check was conducted on April 25, 2022.”
Feb 28, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
AP Background check results - Must receive notification prior to allowing subject to be present at your operation
“The operation allowed a caregiver to provide direct care to children in care prior to receiving a background check determination of, Eligible , Provisional Eligibility with Conditions , or, Eligible with Conditions . The caregiver’s current status is pending.”
-
Written Feeding Instructions - Review and Update Every 30 Days
“Three infant feeding sheets were expired. Infant sheets were last updated on 12/15/2021, 12/6/2021, 12/13/2021.”
All 53 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Aug 18, 2026 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Apr 27, 2026 | Inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Apr 21, 2026 | Report to the state | No violation found |
| Apr 13, 2026 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Apr 9, 2026 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Dec 30, 2025 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Inspection | 9 deficiencies cited |
| Dec 4, 2025 | Assessment | 1 deficiency cited |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Dec 1, 2025 | Report to the state | 8 deficiencies cited |
| Nov 5, 2025 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Oct 28, 2025 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Oct 17, 2025 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Oct 16, 2025 | Report to the state | 1 deficiency cited |
| Oct 14, 2025 | Report to the state | No violation found |
| Oct 8, 2025 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Sep 30, 2025 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Sep 18, 2025 | Inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 28, 2025 | Inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jul 8, 2025 | Report to the state | 1 deficiency cited |
| Feb 25, 2025 | Inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
| Sep 17, 2024 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Sep 5, 2024 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Aug 26, 2024 | Inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 16, 2024 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Report to the state | 1 deficiency cited |
| Jun 17, 2024 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Jun 13, 2024 | Inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jun 12, 2024 | Report to the state | No violation found |
| May 29, 2024 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Apr 9, 2024 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Jun 29, 2023 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Jun 25, 2023 | Report to the state | No violation found |
| May 20, 2023 | Report to the state | No violation found |
| May 15, 2023 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Mar 31, 2023 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Mar 29, 2023 | Report to the state | No violation found |
| Nov 17, 2022 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Aug 10, 2022 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Aug 2, 2022 | Inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Jul 13, 2022 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Jul 8, 2022 | Report to the state | No violation found |
| Jun 30, 2022 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Jun 24, 2022 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Jun 23, 2022 | Report to the state | 7 deficiencies cited |
| May 23, 2022 | Inspection | No violation found |
| May 16, 2022 | Inspection | No violation found |
| May 5, 2022 | Inspection | 7 deficiencies cited |
| Feb 28, 2022 | Inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 19, 2022 | Inspection | No violation found |
| Dec 31, 2021 | Inspection | No violation found |
Is it licensed?
- Licensed Center, permit issued May 27, 2022.
- Accepts state child care subsidies.
- Licensed for ages: Infant, Toddler, Pre-Kindergarten, School.
- Capacity: 103 children.
Texas HHSC, child care operations. Released Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily.
Has Texas acted against it?
- No corrective or adverse action by Texas on record.
- 12 reports to the state on record; Texas doesn’t publish whether they were A complaint allegation the state investigated and found true: the evidence showed it more likely than not happened. Inconclusive means the evidence couldn’t show it either way. Neither inconclusive nor unsubstantiated proves it didn’t happen. Source: California Department of Social Services, complaint findings; each state’s licensing agency..
Texas HHSC, child care operations and inspections and investigations. Released Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily.
Who does the caring?
- Texas doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Texas’s open data doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Texas Rising Star: 3-Star (the middle of three levels).
Texas Workforce Commission, subsidy providers and Texas Rising Star. Released Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 920 child care providers in Tarrant County, the middle value for deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 46.
Texas HHSC, deficiencies (non-compliance data). Released Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Dinh Thi Tran | 1 |
| First Baptist Child Development Center | 11 |
| Nana Childcare and Learning Center | 13 |
| Arlington II Headstart & Child Development Center | 6 |
| Zenith Rock Child Care Center | 18 |
| Kids Humpty Dumpty Academy, LLC | 26 |
| Amazing Kidz Childcare Center LLC This child care provider | 46 |
| Shylicka Chavez | Not given |
| Play Academy Arlington LLC | 42 |
| Latricia King | 0 |
| Tarrant County Kids @ Berry Elementary | 0 |
| Little Vessels Academy | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Texas doesn’t publish whether a complaint was substantiated.
- Texas rates some paperwork slips as High risk, so read what was actually cited.
- Texas doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
Sources
-
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Child care operations (bc5r-88dy).
Released Nov 5, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily. Creative Commons 1.0 Universal (Public Domain Dedication).
-
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Inspections and investigations (m5q4-3y3d).
Released Nov 5, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily. Creative Commons 1.0 Universal (Public Domain Dedication).
-
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Deficiencies (non-compliance data) (tqgd-mf4x).
Released Nov 5, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily. Creative Commons 1.0 Universal (Public Domain Dedication).
-
Texas Workforce Commission, Subsidy providers and Texas Rising Star.
Released Nov 5, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated daily. No licence stated.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Texas HHSC or Texas Workforce Commission. Texas’s own record is on its child care search. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.