Pleasant View Academy
A child care center in Eden, North Carolina 27288
232 West Meadow Rd, Eden, North Carolina 27288. (336) 623-2685.
- administrative action in the last three years
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov.
The short answer
- 45 violations in the last three years
- May 42026 the latest visit on record
- 50 children, its capacity in the state’s list
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean5
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Quality rating
- Many states rate child care in a quality rating system that goes past the licensing rules, such as Texas Rising Star or Kentucky All STARS. Taking part is often voluntary, so a program with no rating hasn’t been rated low. Source: Each state’s quality rating system.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
19 DCDEE visits in the last three years, the latest on May 4, 2026.
45 violations cited in the last three years, 45 of them marked corrected.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
When those violations happened
45 violations in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 3, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each violation, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Apr 21, 2026: unannounced9 violations
-
A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children.
“The black landscape weed barrier is sticking up out of the mulch in multiple areas creating tripping hazards.”
-
All openings to the outer air were not protected against the entrance of flying pest.
“The door to space 4 was open to the outdoor play area.”
-
Children between 12 and 24 months of age were grouped with children 3 years of age or older.
“There were two (2) groups of children, ages one to three years, outside on the same outdoor area.”
-
Children were not adequately supervised at all times.
“A child went indoors to use the restroom without any adult being aware he was gone until he returned to the outdoor play area.”
-
Emergency medical care information was not on file in the center on the child’s first day of attendance and/or was not updated as changes occurred or at least annually for each child.
“The information for two (2) children were not updated annually.”
-
Special diet or food allergy information was not posted where they can be seen in food preparation and eating areas.
“Special diet for children were not posted in the eating areas.”
-
The child care administrator and all staff did not complete the Recognizing and Responding to Suspicions of Child Maltreatment training within 90 days of employment.
“Three (3) new staff have not completed the training. The facility is required to complete due to subsidy rules.”
-
The written feeding plan did not include the child’s name, parent signature, and/or was not dated when received by the center.
“Two (2) children’s feeding plan did not have the parent signature.”
-
The written feeding plan was not modified as the child’s needs changed.
“One (1) child’s feeding plan did not include baby food modification.”
Nov 5, 2025: unannounced3 violations
-
An individual on a provisional criminal background check status was not supervised by a staff person who was determined to be qualified.
“In space 3, an individual with a provisional criminal background check status was alone with four (4) children.”
-
Medications including prescription and non-prescription items were not stored in a locked cabinet or other locked container.
“In space 3 a tube of Nystatin was not in a locked cabinet or other locked container.”
-
Prescribed medicine was not in original labeled container or accompanied by signed and dated written instructions from prescribing physician or health care professional.
“A tube of Nystatin was not in a labeled container and did not have written instructions from a prescribing physician or health care professional.”
May 22, 2025: unannounced3 violations
-
All children were not held or placed in feeding chairs or other appropriate apparatus to be fed.
“On 5/5/25, a staff member failed to feed an infant child in a feeding chair or appropriate apparatus when they placed the 11-month-old infant in the crib, gave the child a bottle and then the staff member walked away from the child.”
-
Caregivers did not document compliance with visually checking on sleeping infants aged 12 months or younger and/or the documents were not maintained for a minimum of one month.
“On 5/5/25, a staff member failed to document visual checks on a sleeping five-month-old every 15 minutes.”
-
Center staff did not comply with the safe sleep policy.
“On 5/5/25, a staff member failed to move a sleeping infant to a crib and allowed them to sleep in a device, other than a crib, for at least 30 minutes. The staff member failed to conduct visually checks on the sleeping infant every 15 minutes. There was approximately 18 minutes that lapsed in between visual checks while the infant was asleep in the device.”
May 13, 2025: unannounced13 violations
-
A child’s hands were not washed after each diaper change.
“An infant’s hands were not washed after his diaper was changed.”
-
A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children.
“I observed an infant laying on a diaper pad that was placed on a flat countertop. While the infant was lying there the teacher wiped her own hands and then went to wash her own hands. The child was not strapped or otherwise constrained.”
-
All children were not held or placed in feeding chairs or other appropriate apparatus to be fed.
“I observed an infant drinking a bottle as she walked around in a walker and another infant drinking a bottle as he laid in a bouncy seat.”
-
An individual written feeding plan was not provided by child’s parent or health care provider or was not followed and posted.
“(omit posting for centers located in a residence) In space 3, a child that was present in the classroom did not have a feeding plan posted.”
-
Caregivers did not document compliance with visually checking on sleeping infants aged 12 months or younger and/or the documents were not maintained for a minimum of one month.
“The teacher stated that she did not document the visual checks for the infants yesterday, May 12, 2025.”
-
Child care providers and uncompensated providers who are not substitute providers or volunteers, including the director did not have a medical report on file prior to employment that was signed by a health care professional and/ or the medical report was older than 12 months.
“Two (2) staff do not have a medical report on file.”
-
Each child’s bed, cot, or 2” mat was not individually assigned and identified.
“In space 3, a cot was not identified for a child.”
-
Each staff member did not have the required medical report, proof of tuberculosis test or screening and/or completed health questionnaire in a medical file, maintained separately from the staff member’s individual personnel file.
“One (1) staff’s medical report and proof of TB test were in their individual personnel file.”
-
On or before the first day of work, all staff, including the director and individuals who volunteer more than once per week did not provide results indicating that they were free of active TB and/or TB test or screening was older than 12 months.
“One (1) staff does not have results or a screening on file.”
-
Plastic bags, materials that could be torn apart and toy parts small enough to be swallowed were accessible to children under three years of age.
“In space 1, there are matchbox cars with small wheels. This classroom is used by all ages first thing in the morning and the last hour in the afternoons.”
-
The EMC plan was not reviewed with all staff annually and whenever the plan was revised.
“There was no proof that the plan had been reviewed with staff.”
-
The trained staff did not review the EPR Plan annually or when information in the plan changed to ensure all information was current.
“There was no documentation on file that the EPR plan was reviewed with staff.”
-
The written feeding plan was not modified as the child’s needs changed.
“In space 3, the teacher stated that a child was being fed baby food but it was not reflected on her feeding plan.”
May 8, 2025: unannounced11 violations
-
A First Aid information sheet was not posted in a place for referral and/or the information sheet did not include all the required information.
“First Aid information sheet was posted however it was located in the administrator’s office which is not always accessible to staff for reference. A staff member failed to follow the appropriate first aid steps for a burn by applying a paper towel to the burn area.”
-
A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children.
“A staff member used and left a bottle warmer, located on the floor in the classroom for infant children, which resulted in a 10-month-old child, pulling the warmer and the water from the warmer spilled on the child’s leg and foot causing 1st and 2nd degree burns.”
-
All staff did not successfully complete certification in CPR training appropriate to the age of the children in care.
“Verification of staff completion of the CPR course from an approved training organization was not in the staff file. A staff member failed to complete CPR training within 90 days of hire.”
-
All staff did not successfully complete certification in First Aid appropriate to the age of children in care.
“Verification of staff completion of First Aid training from an approved training organization was not in the staff file. A staff member failed to complete First Aid training within 90 days of hire.”
-
Child care providers scheduled to work in the infant room, did not complete ITS-SIDS training within two months of employment or did not complete the training every three years.
“Child care administrators did not complete the ITS-SIDS training within 90 days of employment and every three years thereafter. A staff member failed to have ITS-SIDS training on file while working in the classroom for infant children after being employed over 60 days.”
-
Children were not adequately supervised at all times.
“A staff member failed to adequately supervise a group of 3 infant children when she left the classroom unattended which resulted in a 10-month-old child being burned from the water of a bottle warmer. Additionally, a staff member from the classroom for toddler children and a staff member from the classroom for two-year-children left their classrooms unattended for a brief period of time to attend to the injured infant.”
-
Electrical cords were accessible to infants and toddlers.
“A staff member failed to ensure infant children did not have access to electrical cords as an infant was asleep in a bouncy seat with an exposed electrical cord from the bouncy seat to outlet socket.”
-
Incident logs were not completed and maintained as required.
“A staff member failed to log an incident report documenting an injury on 5-5-25 on the facility’s incident log.”
-
Incident reports were not completed each time a child was injured, it did not include all the information required in rule, it was not signed by the parent and/or it was not maintained in the child’s file.
“A staff member completed an incident report documenting a burn injury a 10-month-old sustained on 5-5-25 however all the required components were not documented according to child care rule.”
-
Rule violated (DCDEE’s description below)
“All electrical appliances were not used in accordance with the manufacturers’ instruction. Appliances with heating elements, such as bottle warmers, crock pots, curling irons, irons, coffee pots, and/or their cords were accessible to preschool-age children. A staff member failed to ensure infant children did not have access to a bottle warmer’s cord which resulted in a 10-month-old sustaining 1st and 2nd degree burns.”
-
There was a substantiation of child maltreatment.
“The Division confirmed child maltreatment based on the physical injury of a child.”
Jan 8, 2025: unannounced1 violation
-
Plastic bags, materials that could be torn apart and toy parts small enough to be swallowed were accessible to children under three years of age.
“In space 2 there are vehicles that have wheels small enough to be swallowed. Also, the teacher in space 1 stated that they combine in her room in the mornings and there are matchbox cars in this classroom space.”
Oct 28, 2024: unannounced1 violation
-
The child care operator did not comply with all State laws, federal laws and/or local ordinances that pertain to child health, safety, and welfare, as required by General Statute 110-91.
“Two (2) hallways were cluttered with a folding table, three (3) cubbies, a file cabinet and toys. The direct exit from the classroom for toddlers was blocked by children’s cots.”
May 20, 2024: unannounced4 violations
-
Child care providers and uncompensated providers who are not substitute providers or volunteers, including the director did not have a medical report on file prior to employment that was signed by a health care professional and/ or the medical report was older than 12 months.
“An employee hired on April 29, 2024, does not have a medical on file. An employee hired April 11, 2024, did not have a medical on file until April 15, 2024.”
-
Minimum staff/child ratios and group sizes for the number and ages of children in care were not met.
“There were twelve (12) children, ages two to five years in space 1 with one (1) teacher. The staff/child ratio for classrooms with two-years-old is 1/10.”
-
On or before the first day of work, all staff, including the director and individuals who volunteer more than once per week did not provide results indicating that they were free of active TB and/or TB test or screening was older than 12 months.
“An employee hired April 29, 2024, does not have results of negative TB test or screening on file. An employee hired April 11, 2024, did not have results on file until April 17, 2024. An employee hired May 13, 2024, does not have results on file.”
-
Prior to employment a Criminal Background Check was not completed.
“An employee hired April 11, 2024 did not have a criminal background check completed until April 30, 2024.”
All 19 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Apr 21, 2026 | Unannounced visit | 9 violations cited |
| Apr 10, 2026 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Mar 6, 2026 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jan 22, 2026 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Dec 11, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Nov 5, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 3 violations cited |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Sep 25, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Aug 12, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| May 22, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 3 violations cited |
| May 13, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 13 violations cited |
| May 8, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 11 violations cited |
| Jan 8, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 28, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 1 violation cited |
| May 28, 2024 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| May 20, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 4 violations cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Care Center, holding a Sp Prov GS 110-106 since Oct 24, 2025.
- Licensed for 50 children, ages 0 through 6.
- Enrolled in North Carolina’s subsidized child care program.
- North Carolina’s licence number: 79000292.
- Restriction: Other - Building 1 = capacity 37; Building 2 = capacity 13.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Has North Carolina acted against it?
- DCDEE says it has issued one or more administrative actions for this facility in the past three years; North Carolina’s page doesn’t say what they were, and shows one only after its 30-day appeal period.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Who does the caring?
- North Carolina’s page gives a staff-to-child ratio policy as the provider reports it, unverified by DCDEE, so it isn’t shown.
Who owns it?
- Owner, as North Carolina lists it: Pleasant View Baptist Church Eden, Inc..
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How is it rated?
- North Carolina’s licence for this facility is not star-rated: Sp Prov GS 110-106.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 51 child care providers in Rockingham County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 45.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Trinity Wesleyan Education Center | 23 |
| Kids World, Inc. | 48 |
| Leaksville-Spray Elementary Preschool | 6 |
| Lee’s Little Explorers Child Care Center | 33 |
| Douglass Elementary Preschool | 6 |
| Pleasant View Academy This child care provider | 45 |
| Douglass Head Start | 9 |
| Rhode Island Mill Early Learning Center | 17 |
| Reidsville Baptist Child Care | 28 |
| Community Baptist Schools | 6 |
| Little Kings and Queens Developmental Preschool | 4 |
| The Increase Learning Center, Inc. | 7 |
What the record doesn’t say
- North Carolina doesn’t show a visit summary tied to an open child maltreatment investigation while the case is active, and shows an administrative action only after its 30-day appeal period, without saying what it was.
- DCDEE’s descriptions of violations are shown in its own words; a description that names or may name a person isn’t shown. Visit summaries, the consultants’ full reports, aren’t read.
- North Carolina’s page lists the provider’s own features (transport, ratios) as furnished by the provider and unverified by DCDEE, so they aren’t shown.
Sources
-
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations.
Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily. nc.gov terms: copying and distribution for non-commercial use, without alteration, citing the source. Shown free and never sold; DCDEE’s own words are quoted.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE). North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 3, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.