Precious Little Angels
A family child care home in Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
2424 Heather Glen Lane, Charlotte, North Carolina 28208. (704) 605-2429.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov.
The short answer
- 28 violations in the last three years
- Jan 132026 the latest visit on record
- 8 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean5
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Quality rating
- Many states rate child care in a quality rating system that goes past the licensing rules, such as Texas Rising Star or Kentucky All STARS. Taking part is often voluntary, so a program with no rating hasn’t been rated low. Source: Each state’s quality rating system.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
8 DCDEE visits in the last three years, the latest on Jan 13, 2026.
28 violations cited in the last three years, 28 of them marked corrected.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
When those violations happened
28 violations in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 3, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each violation, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Jan 13, 2026: unannounced10 violations
-
A child care operator did not notify the Division of any new child care providers, as defined in G.S.
“110-90.2(a)(2), who were hired or moved into the child care facility within five business days. The program’s ABCMS roster was also monitored during today’s visit. It was observed to not be completed and maintained, as required.”
-
Application did not include the names and the phone numbers of the child’s physician and the persons to be contacted in an emergency situation.
“Ms. Stewart had a file available for review for all enrolled children. It was observed that two (2) children had incomplete applications on file missing the names and phone numbers of the child’s physician and the persons to be contacted in an emergency situation.”
-
For off-premise activities occurring on regular basis, the standing permission for 12 months had expired.
“Ms. Stewart had a file available for review for all enrolled children. Four (4) children’s files were reviewed. It was observed that three (3) children did not have current permission forms on file for participation in off-premise activities occurring on regular basis.”
-
Operator or other transportation provider did not have written permission from each child’s parents or guardian to transport the child.
“Four (4) children’s files were reviewed. It was observed that three (3) children did not have current written permission from a parent or guardian to transport the child.”
-
Summary of the NC Child Care Law was not given to each child’s parent, guardian, or full-time custodian before the child was enrolled in the home and/or signed statement was not on file.
“It was observed that one child also did not have a signed statement was on file that either a parent, guardian, or full-time custodian received a copy of the Summary of the NC Child Care Law before the child was enrolled in the home.”
-
The EPR Plan did not include the location of the Ready to Go File and/or required information.
“The program’s Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (EPR) and Ready to Go File were reviewed. It was also observed that neither contained all the required information.”
-
The operator did not review the EPR Plan annually or when information in the plan changed to ensure all information is current.
“The program’s Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (EPR) and Ready to Go File were reviewed. It was observed that the plan had not been reviewed and updated by the provider annually, as required.”
-
The operator did not review the EPR Plan with additional caregivers prior to them caring for children and/or on an annual basis.
“Both and Ready to Go File were reviewed. It was observed that the provider last reviewed the program’s Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (EPR) plan on January 29, 2024 with the additional caregiver.”
-
The professional development plan did not include the required information.
“Staff files were reviewed for both Ms. Stewart and the additional caregiver, Ms. McKelvey. It was observed that neither provider had completed an annual professional development plan within the last twelve months, as required.”
-
The signed statement regarding receipt of the shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma policy did not contain the required information.
“Ms. Stewart had a file available for review for all enrolled children. Four (4) children’s files were reviewed. It was observed that two (2) children had signed statements regarding receipt of the shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma policy on file that did not contain the required information.”
Jan 15, 2025: unannounced3 violations
-
All indoor and outdoor areas used by the children were not kept clean, orderly, and free of items which are potentially hazardous to children including removal of items a child can swallow; the removal of loose nails or screws and splinters on inside; and use of outdoor equipment that is too hot to touch.
“While monitoring the outdoor learning environment a balloon bouquet consisting of four partially inflated balloons and crimped curling ribbons were observed present on the ground on the left side of the deck and accessible to children. It was also observed that there were groupings of dead leaves present on the deck, in the immediate play area for children and electrical cords hanging from the side of the home accessible to children.”
-
Health questionnaire was not completed annually.
“Staff files were reviewed for both Ms. Stewart and the additional caregiver, Ms. McKelvey and it was observed that the last completed Health Questionnaire each had on file was dated February 09, 2023.”
-
Operator did not maintain accurate daily attendance records including documentation of arrival and departure for all children in care, including the operator’s own preschool children.
“Daily attendance records were monitored, and it was observed that the daily attendance had not been completed for the day.”
Oct 10, 2024: unannounced2 violations
-
Monthly check for hazards on the outdoor play area was not completed using a form supplied by the Division.
“Monthly outdoor inspections were monitored for the past twelve months and it was observed all were not completed using a form for Family Child Care Home providers supplied by the Division.”
-
Plastic bags, toys, and toy parts small enough to be swallowed, including but not limited to materials that can be easily torn apart such as foam rubber and styrofoam, were accessible to children under the age of three.
“In the entry way and licensed child care space it was observed that both children’s personal items in cubbies and various learning materials on shelves were being stored in plastic bags while children under three years of age were present.”
Oct 4, 2024: unannounced1 violation
-
Operator did not provide supervision according the individual age, needs, and capabilities of each child.
“Operator did not provide supervision according to the individual age, needs, and capabilities of each child. On an unknown date, unbeknownst to staff, a school age child engaged in inappropriate activities with another school age child during naptime in the dramatic play area.”
Jan 22, 2024: unannounced12 violations
-
All indoor and outdoor areas used by the children were not kept clean, orderly, and free of items which are potentially hazardous to children including removal of items a child can swallow; the removal of loose nails or screws and splinters on inside; and use of outdoor equipment that is too hot to touch.
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“During the walk through it was observed that the paint on the walls adjacent to the cubbies in the entry way and on two walls in the child care space have begun to chip. It was also observed that parts of the popcorn textured ceiling in the entry way has visible staining and parts have chipped off. The outdoor learning environment was monitored, and it was observed that there was an exposed black cable wire on the deck and five (5) patio chairs with visible rusting in the same area and accessible to children.”
-
Copies of the required information for an additional caregiver was not on file in the home and/or made available for review.
“It was observed that Ms. McKelvey did not have annual training documentation, annual facility policy review acknowledgements or documentation of completion for Health and Safety trainings available for review.”
-
Items that are prohibited to be an infants sleep space, eg. pillows, wedges, blankets, toys, bumper pads, quilts, loose bedding, towels, and wash cloths were present in the crib with a sleeping infant.
“In the childcare space an infant under 7 months of age was observed sleeping in a pack and play with a blanket and Boppy present.”
-
Operator did not maintain accurate daily attendance records including documentation of arrival and departure for all children in care, including the operator’s own preschool children.
“Daily attendance records were monitored, and it was observed that the daily attendance had not been completed for the day.”
-
Operator did not provide a copy of the shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma policy to parents at time of enrollment, and / or within fourteen days of a changes to the policy.
“It was observed that one (1) enrolled child did not have a signed statement regarding receipt of the facility’s Shaken Baby policy on file.”
-
Operator did not provide a written statement to parents regarding the smoking and tobacco restriction.
“It was observed that one (1) enrolled children did not have a signed statement acknowledging receipt of the facility’s No Smoking policy on file.”
-
Operator did not retain the safe sleep acknowledgement in the child’s records as long as the child was enrolled.
“It was observed that two (2) children under twelve (12) months of age did not have completed copies of the facility’s customized Infant/Toddler Safe Sleep policy on file.”
-
Plastic bags, toys, and toy parts small enough to be swallowed, including but not limited to materials that can be easily torn apart such as foam rubber and styrofoam, were accessible to children under the age of three.
“One child under two years of age was observed putting a crayon in her mouth and biting off pieces of the paper.”
-
Sleeping infants, ages 12 months and younger were not visually checked every 15 minutes.
“An infant under 7 months of age was observed sleeping in a pack and play in the child care space. It was observed that no documentation of safe sleep checks every fifteen (15) minutes had been completed as required.”
-
The EPR Plan did not include the location of the Ready to Go File and/or required information.
“The facility did not have a Ready to Go file available for review.”
-
The operator did not review the EPR Plan annually or when information in the plan changed to ensure all information is current.
“The Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (EPR) was reviewed, and it was observed the plan did not contain up to date information. The plan was last reviewed and updated by the provider on July 12, 2022.”
-
Written record of up-to-date pet vaccinations as required by NC law and local ordinances, including rabies vaccination for dogs and cats, was not available.
“Ms. Stewart has two (2) pet dogs housed onsite. Their vaccination records were monitored and it was observed that one dog did not have an up-to-date vaccination record available for review.”
All 8 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2026 | Unannounced visit | 10 violations cited |
| Jul 17, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Mar 12, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jan 15, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 3 violations cited |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Oct 10, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 2 violations cited |
| Oct 4, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 1 violation cited |
| Jan 22, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 12 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Child Care Home, holding a Four Star Family CC Home License since May 17, 2018.
- Licensed for 8 children, ages 0 through 12.
- Enrolled in North Carolina’s subsidized child care program.
- North Carolina’s licence number: 60001964.
- Restriction: Other - Serves no more than two infants age one.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Has North Carolina acted against it?
- DCDEE says it has taken no action against this facility, for its current licence and location, in the last three years.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Who does the caring?
- North Carolina’s page gives a staff-to-child ratio policy as the provider reports it, unverified by DCDEE, so it isn’t shown.
Who owns it?
- Owner, as North Carolina lists it: Stewart, Justina L.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How is it rated?
- Star Rated License: 4 stars of five.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 529 child care providers in Mecklenburg County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 14; this one had 28.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Little Debbie Day Care II | 29 |
| Sunshine Daycare and Preschool | 33 |
| Joyce’s Day Care | 4 |
| Mrs. Chris Play and Learn Preschool | 13 |
| Our Future Generation Child Care | 5 |
| Dixon Academy of Charlotte, Inc. | 28 |
| Mrs. Chris Play and Learn #2 | 5 |
| A Child’s Choice Learning Center II | 17 |
| Kidz Are Fun Child Development Center #1 | 8 |
| Kidz Are Fun Child Development Center #2 | 7 |
| Precious Little Angels This child care provider | 28 |
| Nana’s Nursery | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- North Carolina doesn’t show a visit summary tied to an open child maltreatment investigation while the case is active, and shows an administrative action only after its 30-day appeal period, without saying what it was.
- DCDEE’s descriptions of violations are shown in its own words; a description that names or may name a person isn’t shown. Visit summaries, the consultants’ full reports, aren’t read.
- North Carolina’s page lists the provider’s own features (transport, ratios) as furnished by the provider and unverified by DCDEE, so they aren’t shown.
Sources
-
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations.
Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily. nc.gov terms: copying and distribution for non-commercial use, without alteration, citing the source. Shown free and never sold; DCDEE’s own words are quoted.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE). North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 3, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.