Roseleaf Gardens
A residential care facility for the elderly in Chico, California 95928
2770 Sierra Ladera Ln, Chico, California 95928. (530) 630-3042.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. California’s own record is on its care facility search.
The short answer
Record last released by California Department of Social Services on Nov 1, 2026.
- 52 citations in the state’s file, about five years Middle in Butte County: 4
- 27 Type A citations, the most serious kind (needs attention)
- 25of 59 complaint allegations substantiated
- 56 residents, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean6
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Type A and Type B citations
- California grades each citation by risk. Type A, the most serious, is a violation that poses an immediate risk to residents’ health, safety or personal rights. Type B is one that could become that risk if it isn’t corrected. Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division.
- Substantiated complaint
- A complaint allegation the state investigated and found true: the evidence showed it more likely than not happened. Inconclusive means the evidence couldn’t show it either way. Neither inconclusive nor unsubstantiated proves it didn’t happen. Source: California Department of Social Services, complaint findings; each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
52 citations in the state’s file, about five years
The middle of the 19 facilities of this kind in Butte County had 4.
51 visits on record since Feb 16, 2022: 5 inspections, 30 complaint visits and 16 other visits; the latest on Aug 12, 2026.
27 Type A citations, the most serious kind
CDSS issues Type A citations for the most serious violations: an immediate risk to the health, safety or personal rights of those in care.
California Department of Social Services, state data file for elderly residential care. Released Nov 1, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those citations happened
48 citations in 17 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
52 citations on record
The state’s file lists each rule cited by number, with the date its correction was due, but not what inspectors found.
California Department of Social Services, state data file for elderly residential care. Released Nov 1, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Rule cited | Correction due |
|---|---|
87411(f) | Apr 29, 2026 |
87458(c)(1)(A) | Apr 29, 2026 |
87303(a) | Apr 22, 2026 |
87468.1(a)(14) | Apr 20, 2026 |
87468.1(a)(2) | Apr 10, 2026 |
87307(d)(6) | Apr 9, 2026 |
87411(a) | Mar 30, 2026 |
87411(c)(1) | Mar 30, 2026 |
87211(a)(1)(A) | Mar 30, 2026 |
87468.1(a)(2) | Feb 20, 2026 |
87465(g) | Feb 20, 2026 |
87211(a)(1)(D) | Feb 20, 2026 |
87625(b)(3) | Feb 6, 2026 |
87411(a) | Feb 2, 2026 |
87303(a) | Nov 4, 2025 |
87303(i(1)(B) | Oct 23, 2025 |
87312 | Oct 10, 2025 |
87464(f)(4) | Jul 31, 2025 |
87468.1(a)(6) | May 28, 2025 |
87309(a) | May 28, 2025 |
87303(a)(d) | May 28, 2025 |
87303(a)(1) | May 28, 2025 |
87608(a)(1) | May 6, 2025 |
87355(e)(3) | Apr 23, 2025 |
87412(g) | Apr 23, 2025 |
87464(f) | Mar 25, 2025 |
87303(a) | Mar 25, 2025 |
87464(d) | Mar 19, 2025 |
87466 | Mar 19, 2025 |
87466 | Feb 13, 2025 |
1569.2 | Nov 14, 2024 |
87411(a) | Oct 30, 2024 |
87705(c)(3)(A) | Oct 30, 2024 |
87465(d)(1)(2) | Aug 7, 2024 |
87411(a) | Jul 10, 2024 |
87705(c)(5) | Jul 10, 2024 |
1569.2(c) | Apr 25, 2024 |
87465(a)(6) | Mar 20, 2024 |
1569.269(a)(6) | Mar 20, 2024 |
87411(f) | Mar 12, 2024 |
87303(e) | Mar 12, 2024 |
87411(c)(1) | Mar 12, 2024 |
1569.695(c) | Mar 12, 2024 |
87608(a)(3) | Mar 12, 2024 |
87618(b)(3)(B) | Mar 12, 2024 |
87303(e)(3) | Mar 6, 2024 |
87303(f)(1) | Mar 6, 2024 |
87411(a) | Feb 2, 2024 |
87213 | Apr 17, 2023 |
87205(a)(b) | Apr 17, 2023 |
1569.605 | Apr 17, 2023 |
87705(f)(2) | Mar 9, 2022 |
All 51 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| May 21, 2026 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Apr 8, 2026 | Inspection | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 23, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 23, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 23, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 23, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jan 8, 2026 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Oct 21, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Oct 21, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Sep 30, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Sep 30, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Sep 30, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Sep 30, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jul 30, 2025 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jun 30, 2025 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| May 27, 2025 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Inspection | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 25, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 18, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Feb 12, 2025 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Feb 12, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Feb 12, 2025 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Nov 13, 2024 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Nov 13, 2024 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Oct 29, 2024 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Aug 6, 2024 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Aug 6, 2024 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jul 10, 2024 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jul 2, 2024 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Apr 25, 2024 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 19, 2024 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 5, 2024 | Inspection | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jan 29, 2024 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Oct 10, 2023 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Oct 10, 2023 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Oct 10, 2023 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jul 18, 2023 | Complaint visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Apr 11, 2023 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Feb 23, 2023 | Inspection | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Sep 7, 2022 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Jul 22, 2022 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Apr 27, 2022 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 9, 2022 | Inspection | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Mar 9, 2022 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
| Feb 16, 2022 | Other visit | Result not in CDSS’s file |
Is it licensed?
- Residential care facility for the elderly (assisted living), licensed by California’s Department of Social Services since Apr 19, 2021 for 56 residents.
- Not Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency..
California Department of Social Services, state data file for elderly residential care. Released Nov 1, 2026. Updated weekly.
Were complaints proven?
- 25 of 59 complaint allegations CDSS investigated were substantiated (substantiated means CDSS found a preponderance of evidence that the violation occurred); 31 were unsubstantiated and 3 unfounded.
California Department of Social Services, state data file for elderly residential care. Released Nov 1, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 1 allegation substantiated; 1 Type B citation. |
| Mar 27, 2026 | Substantiated complaint | 3 of 8 allegations substantiated; 3 Type B citations. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 1 allegation substantiated; 1 Type A citation. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Substantiated complaint | 3 of 4 allegations substantiated; 3 Type B citations. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 3 allegations substantiated; 1 Type B citation. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 1 allegation substantiated; 1 Type A citation. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 4 allegations substantiated; 1 Type B citation. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 2 allegations substantiated; 1 Type B citation. |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Substantiated complaint | 4 of 7 allegations substantiated; 2 Type A and 2 Type B citations. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 5 allegations substantiated; 1 Type A citation. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 5 allegations substantiated; 1 Type A citation. |
| Nov 11, 2024 | Substantiated complaint | 2 of 2 allegations substantiated; 2 Type A citations. |
| May 14, 2024 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 1 allegation substantiated; 1 Type B citation. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | Substantiated complaint | 3 of 3 allegations substantiated; 2 Type A citations. |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Substantiated complaint | 1 of 1 allegation substantiated; 1 Type A citation. |
Who does the caring?
- California doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
Who holds the licence?
- Golden Roseleaf Gardens Opco LLC holds the licence.
California Department of Social Services, state data file for elderly residential care. Released Nov 1, 2026. Updated weekly.
How is it rated?
- California doesn’t publish quality ratings for these facilities.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 19 facilities of this kind in Butte County, the middle value for citations in CDSS’s file (about five years) was 4; this one had 52.
California Department of Social Services, state data file for elderly residential care. Released Nov 1, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Citations, about 5 years |
|---|---|
| The Courtyard at Little Chico Creek | 6 |
| Westmont of Chico-Compass Rose | 1 |
| Westmont of Chico-The Inn | 4 |
| Roseleaf Gardens This assisted living facility | 52 |
| Roseleaf Senior Care | 15 |
| The Lighthouse at Chico, LLC | 6 |
| Roses and Ivy Elder Care | 0 |
| Iris Care Home | 1 |
| Country Crest Assisted Living | 8 |
| Amber Grove Place | 13 |
| Mountain Meadow Lodge | 0 |
| Townsend House | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CDSS’s file lists the rules cited by number, without the inspectors’ findings or the visit each came from; the date shown with a citation is the date its correction was due. CDSS’s own record has the reports.
- CDSS’s file covers about the last five years of visits.
- California doesn’t publish staffing levels or quality ratings for these facilities.
Sources
-
California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division, State data file for elderly residential care (CDSS state data file, dated Nov 1, 2026).
Released Nov 1, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. Public domain (CDSS Conditions of Use).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: California Department of Social Services. California’s own record is on its care facility search. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.